Factors Associated with Stunted Growth in Children Under Five Years in Antananarivo, Madagascar and Bangui, Central African Republic

listen audio

Study Justification:
– Stunting is a significant health challenge globally, affecting a fourth of all children under five years old.
– The exact factors contributing to stunting vary in different regions, highlighting the need for tailored interventions.
– This study aimed to assess and compare the factors associated with stunting in two understudied sub-Saharan urban contexts: Bangui, Central African Republic, and Antananarivo, Madagascar.
– The high prevalence of stunting in these areas and the previous collaboration of the research consortium on related projects justified the choice of study sites.
Study Highlights:
– The study included 836 children aged 2-5 years, with 175 stunted and 194 non-stunted children in Antananarivo, and 237 stunted and 230 non-stunted children in Bangui.
– Factors associated with stunting were identified using a standardized questionnaire and logistic regression modeling.
– In both sites, formal maternal education was found to lower the risk of stunting, while restricted access to soap, anemia, and low birth weight were associated with a higher risk of stunting.
– Other factors associated with stunting varied between the two sites, including maternal stature, household head, diarrhea, coughing, breastfeeding, previous severe undernutrition, dermatitis/fungal skin infections, and changes in diet during pregnancy.
Recommendations for Lay Readers and Policy Makers:
– The study suggests that interventions to reduce stunting should focus on maternal education, antenatal care, iron supplementation, and simple water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions such as using soap and infection control.
– In Antananarivo, breastfeeding is highlighted as an important intervention, while in Bangui, improving nutrition during pregnancy is emphasized.
– These recommendations highlight the need for area-specific interventions that address the unique factors contributing to stunting in each context.
Key Role Players:
– Trained interviewers: Conducting the standardized questionnaire and collecting data.
– Healthcare professionals: Involved in sample collection, anthropometric measurements, and clinical examinations.
– Research consortium: Responsible for study design, coordination, and data analysis.
– Local communities: Collaborating with researchers and implementing interventions.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Training and salaries for interviewers and healthcare professionals.
– Equipment and supplies for sample collection, anthropometric measurements, and clinical examinations.
– Translation and printing of questionnaires in local languages.
– Data entry and management.
– Community engagement and intervention implementation costs.
– Statistical analysis software and expertise.
Please note that the provided information is based on the given description and publication.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong because it is based on a case-control study with a large sample size. The study used standardized questionnaires and statistical analysis to identify factors associated with stunting in two different regions. The results provide specific interventions that can be implemented to address stunting. To improve the evidence, the abstract could include more details about the methodology, such as the sampling technique and the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Additionally, providing information about the statistical significance of the findings would further strengthen the evidence.

Objectives: With a fourth of all under-five children affected, stunting remains one of the biggest health challenges worldwide. Even though the main underlying factors are known, the exact pathways to stunting varying in affected regions, and interventions thus need to be tailored to the local contexts. This study aimed assessing and comparing factors associated with stunting in two understudied sub-Saharan urban contexts with some of the highest stunting prevalence globally: Bangui, Central African Republic (~ 36%) and Antananarivo, Madagascar (42%). Methods: We performed a case–control study on 175 + 194 stunted and 237 + 230 non-stunted control children aged 2–5 years and matched for age, gender and district of residency. Factors associated with stunting were identified using a standardized, paper questionnaire delivered by trained interviewers. Statistical analysis was done using logistic regression modelling. Results: In both sites, formal maternal education lowered the risk of being stunted and restricted access to soap, suffering of anaemia and low birth weight were associated with higher risk of stunting. Short maternal stature, household head different from parents, diarrhoea and coughing were associated with an increased risk and continuing breastfeeding was associated with a lower risk of stunting in Antananarivo. Previous severe undernutrition and dermatitis/ fungal skin infections were associated with higher and changes in diet during pregnancy with lower risk of stunting in Bangui. Conclusions: Our results suggest maternal education, antenatal care, iron supplementation and simple WASH interventions such as using soap and infection control as general and breastfeeding (Antananarivo) or better nutrition (Bangui) as area-specified interventions.

The AFRIBIOTA study (Vonaesch et al., 2018b) is a case–control study for stunting in children aged 2–5 years in Bangui, CAR and Antananarivo, Madagascar. The choice of the two study sites was based on the high stunting prevalence and the fact that the consortium worked previously together on a project on diarrhoeal diseases (Breurec et al., 2016; Randremanana et al., 2016). Inclusion criteria were HIV-negative children, neither suffering from acute malnutrition nor from any other severe disease, living in the 6st, 7st or 8th district of Bangui or in two neighbourhoods of Antananarivo (Ankasina or Andranomanalina Isotry). Included children were admitted to the hospital for sample collection and anthropometric measurement. Assuming an alpha-error of 0.05%, a power of 80% and an expected 20% exposure in the cases, we needed at least 169 children per group, hence 676 individuals in the two countries. The final sample size analysed in this study was of 836 children (Fig. 1). Stunted and control children were matched according to age in years, gender, neighbourhood and season of inclusion (dry or wet season). Recruitment took place between December 2016 and March 2018 in Antananarivo and between January 2017 and May 2018 in Bangui. Detailed recruitment procedures are given in the Supplementary methods and the study protocol (Vonaesch et al., 2018b). Flow-chart of the children included in the final analysis. Data is summarized for children included in A Antananarivo, Madagascar and B in Bangui, Central African Republic Height was measured by trained personnel to the nearest 0.1 cm in a standing position using collapsible height boards (Antananarivo: ShorrBoard Measuring Board, Maryland, USA; Bangui: height board provided by UNICEF); weight was measured to the nearest 100 g using a weighing scale (Antananarivo: KERN, ref. MGB 150K100 and EKS, Inter-équipement Madagascar; Bangui: weighting scale provided by UNICEF) and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) was measured using commercial MUAC tape (provided by UNICEF) to the nearest 0.1 cm. Cut-offs were based on the official cut-offs defined by WHO (Onis, 2006). A standardized, paper questionnaire in French that was translated ad hoc to the local languages Sangho and Malagasy was used in both study sites and data was entered in double in an Access database. The questionnaire included information about children’s age, gender, family structure, socioeconomic status indicators, sanitary indicators, data about the mother’s pregnancy and child’s and family nutrition and feeding practices. A wealth index was created based on the minimal set of assets, leading to a separation of subjects in three distinct groups in a principal component analysis (PCoA). Details of the wealth index are given in the extended methods. Each child was further examined for comorbidities and venous blood was collected. Complete blood count, C-reactive protein (CRP) and ferritin levels were measured. Ferritin levels were corrected for systemic inflammation (Thurnham et al., 2010), haemoglobin values were adjusted for altitude (Centers for Disease, 1989; Sullivan et al., 2008) and anaemia was defined as less than 110 g/l, according to WHO criteria (OMS, 2011; Onis, 2006). A dietary diversity score (DDS) was calculated based on a 24 h recall (World Health Organization, 2007a, 2007b). Mother’s nutritional status was based on the Body Mass Index (BMI). Non-pregnant mothers were classified by BMI categories as defined by the WHO and pregnant mothers according to the categories proposed by Ververs (Ververs et al., 2013). Clinical parameters such as cough (observed and reported by the mothers), dermatitis (as visible dermal affections of various origins diagnosed by a medical doctor), diarrhoea (> 3 loose stools/day), and tooth decay were assessed during a clinical examination. Previous episode of severe acute malnutrition and perceived low birth weight was based on mother’s recall. The statistical analysis was performed with Stata 13. Significance level was fixed for all analyses at 0.05 and all tests were performed bilaterally. Categorical variables were expressed as percentages; quantitative variables were expressed as a mean (± Standard Deviation) or median (interquartile range). The stunted vs. non-stunted groups were compared using Chi2 or Fisher Exact test for qualitative variables and the Student t test or the Mann–Whitney U test for quantitative variables. All variables were assessed in a bivariate analysis. Factors associated with stunting in bivariate analysis with a P value of < 0.2 were checked for potential confounding factors and interactions and then included in a backward logistic regression. As we did not get a perfect matching for age, gender and season of inclusion, these variables were forced in the multivariate model. Results are reported as adjusted OR with 95% CI, corrected for age in years, gender, season of inclusion and country of origin.

Based on the provided information, here are some potential recommendations for innovations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Mobile Health (mHealth) Solutions: Develop mobile applications or text messaging services that provide pregnant women with important information about prenatal care, nutrition, and maternal health. These tools can also be used to schedule appointments, send reminders, and provide access to telemedicine consultations.

2. Community Health Workers: Train and deploy community health workers to provide education, support, and basic healthcare services to pregnant women in underserved areas. These workers can conduct home visits, assist with prenatal care, and refer women to appropriate healthcare facilities when necessary.

3. Telemedicine: Implement telemedicine programs that allow pregnant women in remote areas to consult with healthcare providers through video conferencing or phone calls. This can help overcome geographical barriers and provide access to specialized care.

4. Maternal Health Vouchers: Introduce voucher programs that provide pregnant women with financial assistance to access maternal healthcare services. These vouchers can cover the cost of prenatal visits, childbirth, and postnatal care, ensuring that women can afford the necessary care.

5. Transportation Solutions: Develop innovative transportation solutions, such as mobile clinics or ambulance services, to improve access to healthcare facilities for pregnant women in rural or remote areas. This can help overcome transportation barriers and ensure timely access to care.

6. Maternal Health Education Programs: Implement comprehensive maternal health education programs that target both pregnant women and their families. These programs can provide information on prenatal care, nutrition, breastfeeding, and newborn care, empowering women to make informed decisions about their health.

7. Maternal Health Monitoring Systems: Develop digital platforms or wearable devices that allow pregnant women to monitor their health and track important indicators, such as blood pressure, weight, and fetal movements. This data can be shared with healthcare providers for remote monitoring and early detection of potential complications.

8. Public-Private Partnerships: Foster collaborations between government agencies, non-profit organizations, and private sector entities to improve access to maternal health services. These partnerships can leverage resources, expertise, and technology to develop innovative solutions and expand healthcare infrastructure.

It is important to note that these recommendations are general and may need to be adapted to the specific contexts of Bangui, Central African Republic, and Antananarivo, Madagascar.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the information provided, the following recommendations can be developed into an innovation to improve access to maternal health:

1. Tailored Interventions: The study highlights the importance of tailoring interventions to the local contexts. Innovations can be developed to create customized interventions that address the specific factors associated with stunting in different regions. This can include targeted educational programs, antenatal care initiatives, and nutrition interventions that are designed to meet the specific needs of each community.

2. Maternal Education: The study found that formal maternal education lowered the risk of stunting. Innovations can be developed to improve access to education for expectant mothers, especially in underserved areas. This can include mobile learning platforms, community-based education programs, and partnerships with local organizations to provide educational resources.

3. Antenatal Care: The study also identified antenatal care as an important factor in reducing the risk of stunting. Innovations can be developed to improve access to antenatal care services, particularly in areas with high stunting prevalence. This can include mobile clinics, telemedicine platforms, and community outreach programs to ensure that pregnant women receive the necessary care and support.

4. WASH Interventions: The study suggests that simple WASH interventions, such as using soap and infection control, can have a positive impact on reducing stunting. Innovations can be developed to improve access to clean water, sanitation facilities, and hygiene education in communities with high stunting prevalence. This can include the development of low-cost, sustainable solutions for water purification and sanitation, as well as educational campaigns to promote good hygiene practices.

5. Nutrition Interventions: The study found that breastfeeding and better nutrition during pregnancy were associated with a lower risk of stunting. Innovations can be developed to improve access to nutritious food and promote breastfeeding practices in communities with high stunting prevalence. This can include initiatives to support local agriculture, provide nutritional supplements, and educate mothers about the importance of breastfeeding.

Overall, the key recommendation is to develop innovative solutions that address the specific factors associated with stunting in different regions, while also improving access to maternal education, antenatal care, WASH interventions, and nutrition interventions. By implementing these innovations, access to maternal health can be improved, leading to a reduction in stunting and better health outcomes for children.
AI Innovations Methodology
To improve access to maternal health, here are some potential recommendations:

1. Strengthening maternal education: Promote and provide access to education for women, particularly in areas with high stunting prevalence. Educated mothers are more likely to have better knowledge and understanding of maternal health practices, leading to improved outcomes.

2. Antenatal care interventions: Increase the availability and accessibility of antenatal care services, including regular check-ups, nutritional counseling, and iron supplementation. These interventions can help identify and address potential risk factors for stunting during pregnancy.

3. Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions: Implement simple WASH interventions, such as promoting the use of soap and infection control measures, to reduce the risk of infections and improve overall hygiene practices in households. This can contribute to better maternal and child health outcomes.

4. Breastfeeding support: Provide comprehensive support for breastfeeding, including education, counseling, and lactation support services. Breastfeeding has numerous benefits for both the mother and child, including reducing the risk of stunting.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Data collection: Gather data on the current status of maternal health access, including indicators such as maternal education levels, antenatal care coverage, WASH practices, and breastfeeding rates. This data can be obtained through surveys, interviews, and existing health records.

2. Modeling and simulation: Use statistical modeling techniques, such as logistic regression, to analyze the relationship between the identified recommendations and access to maternal health. This can help estimate the potential impact of each recommendation on improving access.

3. Scenario analysis: Create different scenarios by varying the implementation levels of each recommendation. For example, simulate the impact of increasing maternal education rates by 10%, or improving WASH practices by 20%. This allows for a comparison of the potential outcomes under different intervention scenarios.

4. Impact assessment: Evaluate the simulated impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This can be done by comparing the estimated outcomes of each scenario, such as the reduction in stunting prevalence or the increase in antenatal care coverage.

5. Sensitivity analysis: Assess the sensitivity of the results to changes in key parameters or assumptions. This helps identify the robustness of the findings and provides insights into the potential uncertainties or limitations of the simulation.

By following this methodology, policymakers and stakeholders can gain valuable insights into the potential impact of different recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This can inform decision-making and resource allocation for effective interventions.

Partilhar isto:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email