HBV immunization and vaccine coverage among hospitalized children in Cameroon, Central African Republic and Senegal: A cross-sectional study

listen audio

Study Justification:
– Hepatitis B is a major health concern in Africa
– The vaccine against hepatitis B virus (HBV) was introduced into the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) in Cameroon, Central African Republic (CAR), and Senegal
– The study aims to assess HBV immunization coverage following the vaccine’s introduction and identify factors associated with vaccination
Study Highlights:
– 1783 children aged 3 months to 6 years were enrolled between April 2009 and May 2010
– Immunization coverage based on immunization cards was 99%, 49%, and 100% in Cameroon, CAR, and Senegal, respectively
– Immunization coverage based on maternal recall was 91%, 17%, and 88% in Cameroon, CAR, and Senegal, respectively
– Serology-based coverage was 68%, 13%, and 46% in Cameroon, CAR, and Senegal, respectively
– Factors associated with vaccination included mother’s higher education, no malnutrition, access to flushing toilets, and age below 24 months
– The prevalence of HBV-infected children was 0.7%, 5.1%, and 0.2% in Cameroon, CAR, and Senegal, respectively
Recommendations for Lay Reader and Policy Maker:
– Reinforce immunization coverage assessment using immunization cards, maternal recall, and serological data
– Implement regular serology-based studies in African countries as recommended by the WHO
– Address factors associated with vaccine non-compliance, such as malnutrition, lack of maternal education, and poverty
– Actively address these problems in the countries’ vaccination programs
Key Role Players:
– Health Ministries of Cameroon, CAR, and Senegal
– National Immunization Programs
– Pediatric hospitals and healthcare providers
– Public health organizations and NGOs
– Community leaders and educators
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Research and data collection
– Laboratory testing and analysis
– Training and capacity building for healthcare providers
– Vaccine procurement and distribution
– Health education and awareness campaigns
– Monitoring and evaluation of immunization programs

Background: Hepatitis B is a major health concern in Africa. The vaccine against hepatitis B virus (HBV) was introduced into the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) of Cameroon and Senegal in 2005, and of CAR (Central African Republic) in 2008. A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess HBV immunization coverage following the vaccine’s introduction into the EPI and factors associated with having been vaccinated. Methods: All hospitalized children, regardless of the reasons for their hospitalization, between 3 months and 6 years of age, for whom a blood test was scheduled during their stay and whose condition allowed for an additional 2 mL blood sample to be taken, and who provided the parent’s written consent were included. All children anti-HBs- and anti-HBc + were tested for HBsAg. Vaccination coverage was assessed in three different ways: immunization card, maternal recall and serologic anti-HBs profile. Results: 1783 children were enrolled between April 2009 and May 2010. An immunization card was only available for 24 % of the children. The median age was 21 months. Overall HBV immunization coverage based on immunization cards was 99 %, 49 % and 100 % in Cameroon, CAR and Senegal, respectively (p < 0,001). The immunization rate based on maternal recall was 91 %, 17 % and 88 % in Cameroon, CAR and Senegal, respectively (p < 0,001). According to serology (anti-HBs titer ≥ 10 mUI/mL and anti-HBc-), the coverage rate was 68 %, 13 % and 46 % in Cameroon, CAR and Senegal, respectively (p < 0,001). In Senegal and Cameroon, factors associated with having been vaccinated were: mother's higher education (OR = 2.2; 95 % CI [1.5-3.2]), no malnutrition (OR = 1.6; 95 % CI [1.1-2.2]), access to flushing toilets (OR = 1.6; 95 % CI [1.1-2.3]), and < 24 months old (OR = 2.1; 95 % CI [1.3-3.4] between 12 and 23 months and OR = 2.7; 95 % CI [1.6-4.4] < 12 months). The prevalence of HBV-infected children (HBsAg+) were 0.7 %, 5.1 %, and 0.2 % in Cameroon, CAR and Senegal, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Assessing immunization coverage based on immunization cards, maternal recall or administrative data could be usefully reinforced by epidemiological data combined with immunological profiles. Serology-based studies should be implemented regularly in African countries, as recommended by the WHO. Malnutrition, lack of maternal education and poverty are factors associated with vaccine non-compliance. The countries' vaccination programs should actively address these problems.

A cross-sectional study was conducted in five children’s hospitals: one hospital in Bangui (CAR), two in Yaoundé (Cameroon) and two in Dakar (Senegal). Both the Yaoundé and Dakar study sites included one pediatric hospital treating infants from families of impoverished socioeconomic status, and one general hospital serving a relatively well-off population. The Bangui site was a pediatric hospital serving children from families of all socioeconomic levels living in the city and its outskirts. Between April 2009 and May 2010, children aged 3 month to 6 years, hospitalized for any reason, with a blood sample prescribed during hospitalization, health conditions allowing an extended blood sample between 2 mL and 5 mL according to the age. Children were consecutively enrolled after their parents or legal guardians received an information notice and oral explanation in the local language and provided a written consent. This study was approved by the Senegal Health Research National Council, the National Ethics Committee of Cameroon and the Scientific Committee responsible for validation protocols and study results in Central African Republic. Data collected were: i) general characteristics (age, sex, weight), ii) clinical features (reasons for hospitalization, vaccination records on the immunization card), iii) socio-economic characteristics (place of residence, number of people in the household, mother’s education (higher level: at least primary education), personal transportation, electricity, running water, toilets type) and iv) serological data (anti-HBs antibodies, anti-HBc antibodies, HBsAg, HBeAg) and HBV DNA, when the child was HBsAg-positive. If the enrolled child’s immunization card was available, vaccination against HBV and dates of vaccination were recorded. Otherwise, the mother was asked about the child’s vaccination status. Complete vaccination was defined as having received all three injections according to the vaccination card in compliance with the WHO vaccination schedule (6, 10 and 14 weeks of age). Partial vaccination was defined as having received one or two doses according to the immunization card, regardless of the immunization schedule. Nutritional status was estimated separately for boys and girls by the Z-score, calculated on the weight for age, according to WHO standards for children between 3 and 60 months old, and to CDC standards for older children. Moderate or severe malnutrition was defined as a Z-score ≤ −2 SD [19–21]. All samples were tested for anti-HBc and quantified for anti-HBs by Enzyme ImmunoAssay (EIA) (DiaSorin Biomedica, Sallugia, Italy). The correlate of protection for HBV is an anti-HBs titer ≥10 mIU/mL [22, 23]. All children anti-HBs-negative and anti-HBc-positive were tested for HBsAg by automated EIA (AxSYM, Abbott laboratories, Chicago, USA). All HBsAg-positive children’s mothers were called by phone so that children could be retested free of charge six months later. Viral loads were measured by the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HBV assay, v2.0 (Roche Diagnostics, Meylan, France) at Saint-Louis Hospital. The limit of detection was 20 IU /mL. Except for viral load quantification, all laboratory tests were performed in each country. The children’s characteristics were described as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) for continuous variables and percentages for discrete variables. For univariate and multivariate analysis, quantitative variables were expressed as dichotomous variables using either the median or a clinically relevant threshold. Univariate analysis was based on the Fisher’s exact test for discrete variables and by analysis of variance or the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables. All variables associated with “having been vaccinated” in univariate analysis (p < 0.25) were included in a backward stepwise logistic regression model. A p value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Adequacy of the model was established through the Hosmer Lemeshow tests. Interactions between the variables found to be associated with “having been vaccinated” in the univariate analysis were tested using likelihood-ratio test. Our data on immunization coverage estimated by serological markers in children born one year after integration of vaccine into EPI (2005 in Cameroon and Senegal, and 2008 in CAR) were compared with data reported by WHO on immunization coverage of surviving infants between 2006 and 2009 [24–26]. Data were analyzed using STATA software version 12.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas). Using the only publication showing that it is possible to distinguish between the passive transfer of maternal anti-HBc and HBV exposure in children ≥12 months [27], we divided subjects between children younger than 12 months and those older than 12 months.

Based on the provided information, here are some potential innovations that could be used to improve access to maternal health:

1. Mobile Health (mHealth) Solutions: Develop mobile applications or SMS-based systems to provide pregnant women with information on prenatal care, vaccination schedules, and reminders for appointments. This can help improve communication and access to healthcare services.

2. Telemedicine: Implement telemedicine programs that allow pregnant women in remote or underserved areas to consult with healthcare providers through video calls or phone consultations. This can help overcome geographical barriers and provide access to specialized care.

3. Community Health Workers: Train and deploy community health workers to provide education, counseling, and basic healthcare services to pregnant women in their communities. This can help bridge the gap between healthcare facilities and remote areas, improving access to maternal health services.

4. Maternal Health Vouchers: Introduce voucher programs that provide pregnant women with financial assistance to access maternal health services, including antenatal care, delivery, and postnatal care. This can help reduce financial barriers and increase utilization of healthcare services.

5. Public-Private Partnerships: Foster collaborations between public and private sectors to improve access to maternal health services. This can involve leveraging private healthcare providers, pharmacies, and technology companies to expand service delivery and reach more pregnant women.

6. Maternal Health Clinics: Establish dedicated maternal health clinics or centers that provide comprehensive care for pregnant women, including antenatal care, delivery services, and postnatal care. These clinics can be equipped with skilled healthcare providers and necessary facilities to ensure quality care.

7. Health Education Programs: Develop and implement health education programs that focus on maternal health, including topics such as nutrition, hygiene, breastfeeding, and family planning. These programs can be conducted in schools, community centers, and through mass media to reach a wider audience.

8. Transportation Support: Address transportation challenges by providing transportation support to pregnant women, especially in rural or remote areas. This can involve organizing community transport services or partnering with local transportation providers to ensure pregnant women can access healthcare facilities.

9. Maternal Health Monitoring Systems: Implement digital health solutions that enable real-time monitoring of maternal health indicators, such as blood pressure, weight, and fetal movements. This can help identify high-risk pregnancies early and ensure timely interventions.

10. Maternal Health Financing: Explore innovative financing mechanisms, such as microinsurance or community-based health financing, to make maternal health services more affordable and accessible to all women, regardless of their socioeconomic status.

These innovations can help improve access to maternal health services, enhance the quality of care, and ultimately contribute to better maternal and child health outcomes.
AI Innovations Description
The recommendation to improve access to maternal health based on the study is to implement regular serology-based studies in African countries, as recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). This would involve regularly testing children for hepatitis B virus (HBV) immunization coverage using serological markers, such as anti-HBs antibodies and anti-HBc antibodies.

Additionally, the study found that factors such as malnutrition, lack of maternal education, and poverty were associated with vaccine non-compliance. Therefore, it is important for vaccination programs in these countries to actively address these problems. This could include providing education and resources to mothers, improving access to nutritious food, and addressing socioeconomic disparities.

By implementing regular serology-based studies and addressing the underlying factors contributing to vaccine non-compliance, access to maternal health can be improved and the prevalence of HBV-infected children can be reduced.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided study, here are some potential recommendations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Strengthen immunization programs: Focus on improving the coverage and accessibility of hepatitis B vaccination for pregnant women, ensuring that all women receive the vaccine during antenatal care visits.

2. Enhance education and awareness: Implement comprehensive education programs to increase awareness about the importance of maternal immunization, including the benefits of hepatitis B vaccination for both the mother and the child.

3. Improve healthcare infrastructure: Invest in healthcare infrastructure, particularly in rural areas, to ensure that pregnant women have access to quality antenatal care services, including immunization.

4. Address socioeconomic factors: Address socioeconomic factors such as poverty, lack of education, and malnutrition, which have been identified as barriers to vaccine compliance. Implement targeted interventions to address these factors and improve vaccine uptake.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Baseline data collection: Gather data on the current immunization coverage, healthcare infrastructure, education levels, and socioeconomic factors related to maternal health in the target population.

2. Define indicators: Identify specific indicators to measure the impact of the recommendations, such as immunization coverage rates, maternal knowledge and awareness, healthcare facility accessibility, and socioeconomic indicators.

3. Develop a simulation model: Create a simulation model that incorporates the baseline data and the potential impact of the recommendations. This model should consider factors such as population size, vaccination rates, healthcare facility distribution, and the influence of socioeconomic factors.

4. Run simulations: Use the simulation model to run various scenarios, incorporating different levels of implementation and effectiveness of the recommendations. This will allow for the estimation of the potential impact on access to maternal health.

5. Analyze results: Analyze the simulation results to determine the potential impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. Assess the changes in immunization coverage, healthcare facility accessibility, and socioeconomic factors.

6. Refine and iterate: Based on the analysis of the simulation results, refine the recommendations and the simulation model if necessary. Repeat the simulation process to further assess the potential impact and optimize the recommendations.

By following this methodology, policymakers and healthcare professionals can gain insights into the potential impact of different interventions and make informed decisions to improve access to maternal health.

Partilhar isto:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email