Background: Even though recent progress, Ethiopia continues to be one of the most significant contributors to the worldwide burden of maternal mortality. Evidence-based intrapartum practices have significant value to improve the health outcome of the mother and the neonate. However, in Ethiopia, it is not exercised according to the standard. Assessing the proportion of evidence-based intrapartum practice and predictors is essential and vital to providing better-quality care to laboring mothers. Hence, this study was aimed to assess the magnitude of evidence-based intrapartum practice and predictors among obstetric care providers working in public hospitals in South Wollo zone, North-central Ethiopia. Patient and Methods: An institutional-based cross-sectional study was employed among 398 obstetric care providers from February 1 to April 30, 2021. Study participants were selected using a simple random sampling technique. Both a structured questionnaire and an observational checklist were used to collect the data. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression was done to determine predictors associated with evidence-based intrapartum practice and P-value <0.05 at 95% CI was declared as statistically significant. Results: The overall magnitude of evidence-based intrapartum care was 54.7% [95% CI (49.6–59.7%)]. Knowledge [AOR = 2.1; 95% CI (1.30–3.38)], computer access [AOR = 2.04; 95% CI (1.27–3.27)], work experience [AOR= 2.13; 95% CI (1.21–3.73)] and training [AOR = 1.81; 95% CI (1.12–2.93)] were found to be statistically significant with evidence-based intrapartum practice. Conclusion: We found that only half of the obstetric care providers applied evidence-based intrapartum practice. Increasing knowledge of intrapartum care, providing continuous training, making the working environment safe to handle experienced providers, and easily access computers in the workplace will be needed to maximize the practice of evidence-based intrapartum care and scale up the quality of care.
An institutional-based cross-sectional study was performed in public hospitals of South Wollo Zone, North-central Ethiopia from February 1 to April 30/2021. South Wollo Zone is among the ten zones found in Amhara Regional State of Ethiopia. South Wollo has 16 hospitals (12 public and four private), 138 health centers, and many private clinics are placed. Out of the total 12 public hospitals, only one is a comprehensive specialized hospital, two are general hospitals and the rest nine were primary hospitals. The source populations were all obstetric care providers who were working in public hospitals of South Wollo zone, whereas the study populations comprise all obstetrics care providers who were working in selected public hospitals of South Wollo zone North-central Ethiopia during the study period. All obstetrics care providers who have a minimum of diploma qualifications in the health-care profession, and had provided obstetric care in the past 6 months in those selected public hospitals of South Wollo zone during the data period were included. Based on the zonal department health office information reports, an overall 950 obstetrics care providers were found in all twelve public hospitals of south Wollo zone North-central Ethiopia and 519 obstetric care providers were found in thus selected six public hospitals. A total of 398 respondents were identified by using single population proportion formula with the assumptions proportion of evidence based intrapartum practice among obstetrics care provider was 38.2% from a similar study,13 the margin of error 5%, confidence interval 95% and 10% non-response rate. Twelve public hospitals provide labor and delivery service in the study area. From the 12 hospitals, we selected six randomly by using lottery methods (Dessie, Akesta, Mekane Selam, Mekdela, Tenta, and Wegidi public hospitals). Samples were selected and proportionally allocated to each selected hospital based on the total number of obstetric care providers and study groups (Dessie = 178, Akesta = 72, Mekane selam=76, Mekdela = 70, Tenta = 65, and Wegidi = 58). Therefore, the calculated sample for each hospital was: Dessie = 136, Akesta = 55, Mekane selam = 58, Mekdela = 54, Tenta = 50, and Wegidi = 45. Evidence based intrapartum practice. Socio-demographic characteristics: age, sex, profession, qualification, income, marital status and experience. Managerial variable: managerial motivation, interactive EBP skill building workshops, in-service training, access to computer and internet, regular mentoring, role clarity. Individual variable: Searching up-to-date health information, participating on conference, training, seminar, and case-study over the last 6 months, Knowledge and Attitude. Evidence-based intrapartum practice: It is a set of standard activities recommended by WHO and national protocols that are expected to be performed by obstetric care providers during intrapartum care. Obstetrics care providers who scored greater than or equal to the median value of intrapartum-practice-related observational checklists.13,15 Obstetric care providers for this study includes: midwife, Integrated emergency surgical officers (IESO) and medical doctors who work in labour and delivery ward to give care and treatment for the women in childbirth and during the period before and after delivery. Knowledge: Obstetric care providers who scored greater than or equal to the median value of knowledge-related questions were considered as having a good knowledge while obstetric care providers who scored less than the median value were considered as having poor knowledge.13 Attitude: Those obstetric care providers who scored greater than or equal to the median value of attitude-related questions of intrapartum practice were labelled as having a positive attitude, whereas obstetric care providers who scored less than the median values were considered as negative attitude.13 Qualification: It is the obstetric care provider’s educational level. It includes: Diploma, BSc, MSc, General practitioners and specialist. Data were collected using a pretested and structured self-administered questionnaire supplemented with observational checklists adapted from a previous study,13 from WHO recommendations on intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience.15 The questionnaire contains 36 questions arranged into four parts; socio-demographic factors, organizational and individual-related factors, knowledge, and attitude parts. The observational checklist also contains twenty-one items and the questionnaire was designed to elicit a “yes” or “no” response to gather the required information related to the utilization of evidence-based intrapartum care or practice-related questions. Pre-testing of both the questionnaire and observational checklist was conducted on 5% of the samples (20 obstetric care providers) in Haik primary public hospital which is not included in the study. Based on the pre-test modifications and corrections including wording, logical sequence, and skip patterns were immediately corrected before use. The data were collected by six BSc Midwives who had previous experience and were supervised by BSc Midwives. Two days of training were given for both data collectors and supervisors on the objective of the study, data collection techniques, items of the tool, and the privacy of the participants. The completeness and consistency of the collected data were cross-checked and compiled by supervisors and principal investigators on a daily basis. First, the data were collected by an observational checklist blindly and then by self-administered questionnaires. The collected data were entered into Epi Data version 4.2 and analyzed using SPSS Version 25 statistical software. Descriptive statistics such as frequencies and percentages were calculated. In addition, the cross-tabulation was computed using dependent and independent variables. To assess the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable, bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was carried out. Those variables in bivariate analysis whose p-value was less than 0.25 (p < 0.25) were fitted in multiple logistic regression by controlling confounding variables. Finally, a significant association was declared at a p-value of <0.05 with 95% CI and AOR, and the result was presented in the form of figures, tables, graphs, and charts. The ethical issue was considered in all stages of the research process, some of the most important are the following: Ethical clearance and approval were obtained from the Ethical Review Committee of college of medicine and health science coordination office under the delegation of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Wollo University. Then a letter of permission was secured from administrative bodies of the area to communicate with relevant bodies at the hospital. After explaining the objectives of the study in detail, informed written consent was taken from all study participants. All participants were reassured of the anonymity and personal identifiers were not used. Then, after obtaining informed consent from every participant, the data collectors continued the job by giving due respect to the norms, values, and beliefs of the study participant and ensure the confidentiality of the data.
N/A