Effect on growth of exposure to maternal antiretroviral therapy in breastmilk versus extended infant nevirapine prophylaxis among HIV-exposed perinatally uninfected infants in the PROMISE randomized trial

listen audio

Study Justification:
The study aimed to compare the effect of postnatal exposure to maternal antiretroviral therapy (mART) in breastmilk versus infant Nevirapine prophylaxis (iNVP) on the somatic growth of HIV-exposed perinatally uninfected infants (HEUs). This is important because malnutrition is highly prevalent in HEUs, increasing their risk of morbidity and mortality throughout their lives. Understanding the impact of different antiretroviral strategies on growth can help optimize the postnatal growth of infants born to women with HIV.
Highlights:
– The study included 2431 mothers with HIV and their 2444 HEUs from six African countries and India.
– The mART regimen contained tenofovir/emtricitabine plus lopinavir/ritonavir.
– Infant growth parameters were compared at postnatal week 10, 26, 74, and 104 using World Health Organization (WHO) z-scores for length-for-age, weight-for-age, and head circumference-for-age.
– After a mean follow-up of 88 weeks, mean length-for-age and weight-for-age were below the WHO reference population mean at all timepoints, whereas mean head circumference-for-age was not.
– There were no clinically relevant differences in growth between the mART and iNVP groups.
– Infants assigned to mART were more likely to have stunting compared to iNVP infants at week 26.
Recommendations:
– Further investment is needed to optimize postnatal growth of infants born to women with HIV.
– Strategies should be developed to address stunting in HEUs, regardless of the antiretroviral strategy used.
Key Role Players:
– Researchers and scientists specializing in HIV, pediatrics, and nutrition.
– Healthcare providers and clinicians involved in the care of HIV-infected mothers and their infants.
– Policy makers and government officials responsible for healthcare and HIV programs.
– Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) working in the field of HIV and child health.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Research funding for conducting further studies on optimizing postnatal growth in HEUs.
– Training and capacity building for healthcare providers and clinicians.
– Development and implementation of interventions to address stunting in HEUs.
– Monitoring and evaluation of the effectiveness of interventions.
– Awareness campaigns and education materials for mothers and caregivers.
– Collaboration and coordination between different stakeholders involved in HIV and child health programs.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong because it is based on a randomized controlled trial with a large sample size. The study compares the effect of postnatal exposure to maternal antiretroviral therapy (mART) in breastmilk versus infant Nevirapine prophylaxis (iNVP) on somatic growth of HIV-exposed perinatally uninfected infants. The study measures growth parameters at multiple timepoints using World Health Organization z-scores. The primary outcome measure is length-for-age z-score (LAZ) at week 26. The study finds no clinically relevant differences between the mART and iNVP groups for LAZ or other growth measures. However, infants assigned to mART were more likely to have stunting compared to iNVP infants at week 26. To improve the evidence, future studies could consider longer follow-up periods and include additional growth measures such as body mass index-for-age.

Background Malnutrition is highly prevalent in HIV-exposed perinatally uninfected infants (HEUs) increasing the risk of morbidity and mortality throughout the life course. We set out to compare the effect of postnatal exposure to maternal antiretroviral therapy (mART) in breastmilk versus infant Nevirapine prophylaxis (iNVP) on somatic growth of HEUs in the randomized PROMISE trial. Methods and findings We randomized 2431 mothers with HIV and their 2444 HEUs from six African countries and India 6-14 days after delivery to mART or iNVP for prevention of breastmilk HIV transmission. The mART regimen contained tenofovir/emtricitabine (99%) plus lopinavir/ ritonavir. Infant growth parameters were compared at postnatal week 10, 26, 74 and 104 using World Health Organization (WHO) z-scores for length-for-age (LAZ), weight-for-age (WAZ), and head circumference-for-age (HCAZ). Week 26 LAZ was the primary endpoint measure. Student T-tests compared mean LAZ, WAZ, and HCAZ; estimated mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) are presented. Maternal and infant baseline characteristics were comparable between study arms. The estimated median breastfeeding duration was 70 weeks. After a mean follow-up of 88 weeks, mean LAZ and WAZ were below the WHO reference population mean at all timepoints, whereas mean HCAZ was not. The mART and iNVP arms did not differ for the primary outcome measure of LAZ at week 26 (p-value = 0.39; estimated mean difference (95%CI) of -0.05 (-0.18, 0.07)) or any of the other secondary growth outcome measures or timepoints (all p-values≥0.16). Secondary analyses of the primary outcome measure adjusting for week 0 LAZ and other covariates did not change these results (all pvalues ≥0.09). However, infants assigned to mART were more likely to have stunting compared to iNVP infants at week 26 (odds ratio (95% CI): 1.28 (1.05, 1.57)). Conclusions In HEUs, growth effects from postnatal exposure to mART compared to iNVP were comparable for measures on length, weight and head circumference with no clinically relevant differences between the groups. Despite breastfeeding into the second year of life, length and weight were below reference population means at all ages in both arms. Further investment is needed to optimize postnatal growth of infants born to women with HIV.

PROMISE was a randomized open-label trial to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of several proven ARV strategies to prevent vertical HIV transmission and optimize maternal health and child survival among healthy women who did not meet local criteria to initiate ART in settings with varying standards of care [13–15]. Fig 1 presents the overall PROMISE trial schema in countries where maternal ART was not standard at the time, illustrating the three sequential PROMISE components; Antepartum, Postpartum and Maternal Health (S1 Fig). The Postpartum randomization for breastfeeding mother-infant pairs was conducted at 14 health facility-based research sites in seven countries: India, Malawi, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe. There was no apparent difference in premature study discontinuation for reasons other than death; 23 in the mART arm (2% of 1,227 randomized) and 15 in the iNVP arm (1% of 1217) (p = 0.81). The median (Q1-Q3) follow-up in both arms was to 104 weeks of age (74–105), with a mean of 88 weeks. Most infants still breastfed (93.7% (95%CI: 92.6%, 94.6%)) at 26 weeks of age. The estimated median (Q1-Q3) duration of breastfeeding and, hence, postnatal ARV exposure was 70 weeks (56–82) and not different in both study arms. As previously reported [16], 14 breastfed infants acquired HIV infection during postnatal follow-up (7/1219 mother-infant pairs in the maternal ART arm and 7/1211in the infant NVP arm). Women were recruited with their uninfected infants to the Postpartum Component between 2011 and 2015 after completing the Antepartum Component or when first identified as HIV-infected during active labor (“late presenters”). Maternal inclusion criteria included the intent to breast feed, a CD4 count >350 cells/mm3 at enrollment and above the country specific threshold for initiation of ART, hemoglobin ≥7.0 grams/dL, white blood cell count (WBC) ≥1500 cells/mm3, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥750 cells/mm3, platelets ≥50,000 cells/mm3, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤2.5x upper limit of normal, and estimated creatinine clearance of ≥60mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault equation for women). Inclusion criteria for infants included age ≤14 days, negative HIV nucleic acid test on a specimen drawn prior to the week 1 visit, hemoglobin ≥10 grams/dL, WBC ≥1,500 cells/mm3, ANC ≥750 cells/mm3, platelets ≥50,000 cells/mm3, and ALT ≤2.5x ULN. Mothers were excluded if they required ART for their own health. For multiple births, a mother-infant pair was enrolled only if all infants could be enrolled. Infants were excluded for life-threatening conditions or circumstances that would make long-term follow-up unlikely in the judgment of the site physician or when birthweight was 28 days) or through age 18 months, whichever came first, unless stopped for infant HIV infection, toxicity or other medical reason. All study infants received standard-of-care iNVP during the first six weeks of life and cotrimoxazole prophylaxis thereafter, per local guidelines. On July 6, 2015 PROMISE sites were notified that all maternal participants should be offered life-long ART for their health based on the results of the Strategic Timing of AntiRetroviral Treatment (START) study [19] which demonstrated a significant benefit to beginning ART early, including in those with high CD4 counts. Analyses are thus based on data collected at visits through the date of notification. Length, weight and head circumference were measured by trained study personnel using standard methods at birth and weeks 1, 6, 10, 14, 26, 38, 50, 62, 74, 86, 98 and 104 of life. Measurements of length and weight were performed using standardized rigid length boards and calibrated weighing scales. Mothers received infant feeding counselling throughout the study and were supported to breastfeed exclusively for the first six months of life followed by the gradual introduction of appropriate foods and fluids. The timing of cessation of breastfeeding was determined by the mother. Breastfeeding status and infant illnesses were recorded at each visit. The full PROMISE 1077BF protocol can be accessed on the protocol website at https://www.impaactnetwork.org/studies/1077BF.asp. The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (ClinicalTrials.gov number {“type”:”clinical-trial”,”attrs”:{“text”:”NCT01061151″,”term_id”:”NCT01061151″}}NCT01061151). Written informed consent was obtained from each maternal study participant for her and her child’s participation. Study conduct adhered to international guidelines and was reviewed every six months by an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board. Ethics committees and institutional review boards that approved this study include—MUJHU/Kampala, Uganda: The Joint Clinical Research Centre (JCRC) IRB, the National Drug Authority and the Uganda National Council of Science and Technology (UNCST) in Uganda and the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions (JHMI) IRB in the U.S.; Wits RHI Shandukani CRS and Soweto IMPAACT CRS, Johannesburg, South Africa: University of Witwatersrand Human Ethics Research Committee (Medical), Medicines Control Council (South African Health Products Regulatory Authority in February 2018); FAM-CRU CRS, Cape town, South Africa: Health Research Ethics Committee (HREC), Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University and Medicines Control Council (South African Health Products Regulatory Authority in February 2018); Durban Paediatric HIV CRS, Durban, South Africa: University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN) Biomedical Research Ethics Committee, Medicines Control Council (South African Health Products Regulatory Authority in February 2018); George CRS, Lusaka, Zambia: University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill Biomedical IRB and University of Zambia Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (UNZABREC); Harare, Seke North and St. Mary’s sites, Zimbabwe: Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe(MRCZ), Research Council of Zimbabwe (RCZ), Medicine Control Authority of Zimbabwe (MCAZ), Joint Parirenyatwa group of Hospitals/University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee(JREC); Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Medical College (BJMC) CRS, Pune, India: BJ Government College CTU Ethics Committee and Johns Hopkins IRB; Blantyre, Malawi: College of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee (COMREC) in Malawi, Pharmacy, Medicines and Poisons Board and Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions (JHMI) IRB in the U.S.; Lilongwe, Malawi: National Health Sciences Research Committee (NHSRC) in Malawi Pharmacy, Medicines and Poisons Board, and University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (UNC-CH) Office of Human Research Ethics IRB in the U.S and Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC), Moshi, Tanzania: Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College Ethics Committee, National Health Research Ethics Committee and Tanzania Medicines and Medical Devices Authority. Age and sex-appropriate World Health Organization z-scores were computed for LAZ, WAZ and HCAZ based on the SAS macro for z-score calculations for children aged <61 months [20]. The primary objective comparison timepoint was Week 26 and primary outcome measure was LAZ at Week 26; LAZ at weeks 10, 74, and 104, as well as WAZ and HCAZ at weeks 10, 26, 74, and 104 were secondary outcome measures. Mean z-scores for each anthropometric measure were compared at these timepoints between the assigned study arms—mART versus iNVP. Primary analyses were carried out using an intent to treat approach (analyzed as randomized), as were secondary analyses on additional growth outcome measures. Selected subgroup and restricted/as-treated analyses were performed as secondary analyses. Except for accrual and baseline summaries the unit of analysis was the infant. Twins were analyzed separately. Mean age adjusted z-scores were compared with a Student’s t-test. Modification of the mART versus iNVP effect by subgroups (interaction tests) were assessed via linear regression. Comparisons of other data applied Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis for continuous data, X2/exact tests for categorical data, as appropriate. Treatment effects for binary outcomes were summarized with odds ratios from logistic regression. P-values and tests were two-sided and nominal with a significance level set at 0.05. The z-scores were also compared for LAZ stunting, WAZ underweight and HCAZ using a binary categorization with the following standard deviation (SD) cut offs: z-score < -2 SD and ≥-2 SD [21]. The individual level data cannot be made publicly available due to the ethical restrictions in the study’s informed consent documents and in the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials (IMPAACT) Network’s approved human subjects protection plan; public availability may compromise participant confidentiality. However, data are available to all interested researchers upon request to the IMPAACT Statistical and Data Management Centre’s data access committee by email to [email protected] or [email protected]. This committee reviews and responds to requests for data, obtains necessary approvals from IMPAACT leadership and the NIH, arranges for signature of a Data Use Agreement, and releases the requested data.

Based on the provided information, it seems that the study focused on comparing the effects of postnatal exposure to maternal antiretroviral therapy (mART) in breastmilk versus infant Nevirapine prophylaxis (iNVP) on the somatic growth of HIV-exposed perinatally uninfected infants (HEUs). The study aimed to improve access to maternal health by evaluating different strategies to prevent vertical HIV transmission and optimize maternal and child health.

Some potential innovations or recommendations to improve access to maternal health based on this study could include:

1. Strengthening antenatal care: Enhance antenatal care services to ensure early identification of HIV-positive pregnant women, provide comprehensive counseling on the benefits of antiretroviral therapy (ART), and promote adherence to treatment regimens.

2. Integrated maternal and child health services: Integrate maternal and child health services to provide holistic care for both the mother and the infant, including regular monitoring of growth parameters, nutritional support, and counseling on infant feeding practices.

3. Improved access to antiretroviral therapy: Ensure that pregnant women living with HIV have timely access to antiretroviral therapy, including both antepartum and postpartum prophylaxis, to reduce the risk of vertical transmission and improve maternal and infant health outcomes.

4. Enhanced breastfeeding support: Provide comprehensive breastfeeding support and counseling to HIV-positive mothers, including guidance on exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months, gradual introduction of appropriate complementary foods, and continued breastfeeding up to two years or beyond.

5. Nutritional interventions: Implement targeted nutritional interventions to address the high prevalence of malnutrition among HIV-exposed perinatally uninfected infants, including the provision of nutrient-rich foods, nutritional supplements, and micronutrient supplementation.

6. Community-based interventions: Strengthen community-based interventions to raise awareness about maternal health, HIV prevention, and infant feeding practices, and to provide ongoing support to HIV-positive mothers and their families.

7. Capacity building for healthcare providers: Enhance the capacity of healthcare providers through training programs on maternal and child health, HIV prevention, and the management of HIV-exposed infants, to ensure the delivery of high-quality care and support.

8. Research and innovation: Continue to invest in research and innovation to identify new strategies and interventions that can further improve access to maternal health and optimize outcomes for HIV-exposed perinatally uninfected infants.

It is important to note that these recommendations are based on the information provided and may need to be tailored to specific contexts and healthcare systems.
AI Innovations Description
The study you provided is titled “Effect on growth of exposure to maternal antiretroviral therapy in breastmilk versus extended infant nevirapine prophylaxis among HIV-exposed perinatally uninfected infants in the PROMISE randomized trial.” The study aimed to compare the impact of postnatal exposure to maternal antiretroviral therapy (mART) in breastmilk versus infant nevirapine prophylaxis (iNVP) on the growth of HIV-exposed perinatally uninfected infants (HEUs).

The findings of the study showed that there were no clinically relevant differences in growth outcomes between the mART and iNVP groups. Both groups had below-average length and weight compared to the World Health Organization (WHO) reference population at all timepoints. However, infants assigned to mART were more likely to have stunting (length-for-age z-score < -2 standard deviations) compared to iNVP infants at week 26.

Based on these findings, the study recommends further investment to optimize the postnatal growth of infants born to women with HIV. This suggests that additional interventions or strategies may be needed to improve the growth outcomes of HEUs, regardless of the antiretroviral therapy used.

It is important to note that the individual-level data from the study cannot be made publicly available due to ethical restrictions and participant confidentiality. However, interested researchers can request access to the data through the IMPAACT Statistical and Data Management Centre’s data access committee.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided information, here are some potential recommendations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Strengthening healthcare infrastructure: Investing in healthcare facilities, equipment, and trained healthcare professionals can improve access to maternal health services. This includes establishing well-equipped clinics and hospitals in remote areas, ensuring availability of essential medicines and supplies, and training healthcare workers to provide quality maternal care.

2. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions: Utilizing mobile technology to provide maternal health information, reminders, and support can help improve access to care. This can include sending SMS messages with important health tips, appointment reminders, and emergency helpline numbers. Mobile apps can also be developed to provide educational resources and track maternal health indicators.

3. Community-based interventions: Engaging local communities and community health workers can help improve access to maternal health services. Community health workers can provide basic antenatal and postnatal care, educate women about maternal health, and facilitate referrals to healthcare facilities when needed. Community-based interventions can also address cultural and social barriers that prevent women from seeking care.

4. Telemedicine: Using telecommunication technology to provide remote consultations and medical advice can improve access to maternal health services, especially in rural and underserved areas. Telemedicine allows pregnant women to consult with healthcare professionals without the need for travel, reducing barriers to care.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Define the target population: Identify the specific population that will benefit from the recommendations, such as pregnant women in a particular region or community.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather data on the current access to maternal health services, including factors such as distance to healthcare facilities, availability of healthcare providers, and utilization rates.

3. Define indicators: Determine the key indicators that will be used to measure the impact of the recommendations, such as the number of antenatal visits, percentage of women receiving skilled birth attendance, or reduction in maternal mortality rates.

4. Develop a simulation model: Create a mathematical or statistical model that incorporates the baseline data and simulates the impact of the recommendations on the chosen indicators. This model should consider factors such as population size, geographical distribution, healthcare infrastructure, and potential barriers to access.

5. Run simulations: Use the simulation model to project the potential impact of the recommendations over a specific time period. This can involve running multiple scenarios to assess the effectiveness of different interventions or combinations of interventions.

6. Analyze results: Evaluate the simulation results to determine the potential improvements in access to maternal health services. This can include quantifying the expected increase in antenatal visits, reduction in maternal mortality rates, or improvement in other relevant indicators.

7. Validate and refine the model: Compare the simulation results with real-world data and feedback from stakeholders to validate the model’s accuracy. Refine the model as needed to improve its predictive capabilities.

By following this methodology, policymakers and healthcare providers can gain insights into the potential impact of different innovations and interventions on improving access to maternal health. This information can guide decision-making and resource allocation to prioritize the most effective strategies.

Partilhar isto:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email