Background: Anemia during pregnancy is a public health problem especially in developing countries and it is associated with maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes. There is no meta-analysis on anemia during pregnancy in Sudan. The current systemic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the prevalence, types and determinant of anemia during pregnancy in Sudan. Methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed. The databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and African Journals Online) were searched using; anemia, pregnancy related anemia and Sudan. Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) and Modified Newcastle – Ottawa quality assessment scale were used for critical appraisal of studies. The pooled Meta logistic regression was computed using OpenMeta Analyst software. Results: Sixteen cross-sectional studies included a total of 15, 688 pregnant women were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of anemia among pregnant women in Sudan was 53.0% (95%, CI = 45.9-60.1). The meta-analysis showed no statistical significant between the age (mean difference = 0.143, 95 CI = – 0.033 – 0.319, P = 0.112), parity (mean difference = 0.021, 95% CI = – 0.035 – 0.077, P = 0.465) between the anemic and no anemic women. Malaria was investigated in six studies. Pregnant women who had malaria infection during pregnancy were 1.94 times more likely to develop anemia than women who had no malaria infection (OR = 1.94, 95% CI =1.33-2.82). Six (37.5%) studies investigated type of anemia. The pooled prevalence of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) among pregnant women in Sudan was 13.6% (95% CI = 8.9-18.2). Conclusion: There is a high prevalence of anemia among pregnant in the different region of Sudan. While age and parity have no association with anemia, malaria infection was associated with anemia. Interventions to promote the strengthening of antenatal care, and access and adherence to nutrition, and malaria preventive measures are needed to reduce the high level of anemia among pregnant women in Sudan.
Findings from published studies were used to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prevalence of anemia, types and its determinants (age, parity and malaria) among pregnant women in Sudan. The major databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and African Journals Online were reviewed for all published studies relevant to anemia during pregnancy and its determinant factors. All studies that were published up to April 03/2018 were retrieved to be assessed for eligibility of inclusion in this review. In addition, the reference list of each included study was also searched, retrieved and assessed for inclusion eligibility. The terms that used for searching are: “anemia OR anemia during pregnancy OR determinants of anemia AND Sudan”. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed for conduction of this systematic review and meta-analysis [25]. The primary outcome of this study was the prevalence of anemia during pregnancy. The WHO defines anemia in pregnancy as low blood hemoglobin concentration, below 11 g/dl or hematocrit level less than 33% dl [2]. The secondary outcomes were; types and determinants (age, parity and malaria) of anemia during pregnancy. The included studies were assessed by using Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) [26]. Modified Newcastle – Ottawa quality assessment scale for cross sectional studies was used to assess the quality of the study for inclusion [27]. The total score for the modified Newcastle – Ottawa scale for cross sectional studies is nine (9) stars as a maximum for the overall scale with the minimum of zero. A study was considered high quality if it achieved 7 out 9 and medium if it achieved 5out of 9, Table 1, Additional file 1. Summary and the assessment of the included studies Two reviewers (IA & YI) independently assessed the quality of each article for inclusion in the review. The disagreement arise between the reviewers was resolved through discussion and involvement of a third reviewer (OE). A tool for data extraction was developed to extract the most important relevant information for the review. It consists of tables that include information about the authors’ name, year of publication, study location, sample size, age of study participants, and number of pregnancies, malaria with pregnancy, type of anemia and presence and types of complications of anemia. OpenMeta Analyst software for Windows [28, 29] was used to perform all the meta-analyses of prevalence and determinants (age, parity and malaria) of anemia. The heterogeneity of the included studies was evaluated using Cochrane Q and the I2. Cochrane Q with P 50 was taken as standard to indicate the presence of heterogeneity of the included studies [30]. Based on the results of the analysis of Cochrane Q and I2 the random effects or fixed model was used to combine the included studies accordingly. A sub-group analysis was performed to investigate the association between malaria and anemia.