Men’s and women’s knowledge of danger signs relevant to postnatal and neonatal careseeking: A cross sectional study from Bungoma County, Kenya

listen audio

Study Justification:
– Neonatal and maternal mortality rates are high in Kenya.
– Knowledge of neonatal danger signs can reduce delays in seeking care.
– Male partners play an influential role in improving maternal and newborn health.
– This study aims to analyze factors that determine men’s and women’s knowledge and practices in postnatal and neonatal care-seeking to inform future interventions.
Study Highlights:
– 51.2% of women and 50.0% of men knew at least one neonatal danger sign.
– Women knew more individual danger signs than men.
– Women’s knowledge of neonatal danger signs was associated with attending antenatal care ≥4 times, facility birth, and having a male partner accompany them to antenatal care.
– Higher monthly household income was associated with facility delivery.
Study Recommendations:
– Future interventions should focus on improving knowledge of neonatal danger signs.
– Encourage women to attend antenatal care at least four times.
– Promote facility births and male partner involvement in antenatal care.
– Consider the extra costs of facility delivery and address barriers to men participating in antenatal and postnatal care.
Key Role Players:
– Healthcare providers
– Community health workers
– Male partners
– Women’s groups and organizations
– Policy makers and government officials
– Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) working in maternal and newborn health
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Training and capacity building for healthcare providers and community health workers
– Awareness campaigns and educational materials for women, men, and communities
– Infrastructure and equipment for healthcare facilities
– Incentives or support for male partners to accompany women to antenatal care
– Support for women’s groups and organizations working in maternal and newborn health
– Monitoring and evaluation of interventions
– Research and data collection to assess the impact of interventions

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is moderately strong. The study used a quantitative, cross-sectional design and included a relatively large sample size of 348 women and 82 men. The study analyzed factors associated with knowledge and care-seeking practices related to postnatal and neonatal care in Bungoma County, Kenya. The findings showed that 51.2% of women and 50.0% of men knew at least one neonatal danger sign. The study also identified associations between knowledge of danger signs and factors such as attending antenatal care, facility birth, and male partner involvement. However, the study did not establish causality and relied on self-reported data, which may be subject to recall bias. To improve the strength of the evidence, future studies could consider using a longitudinal design to establish causal relationships and validate self-reported data with objective measures. Additionally, including a control group and conducting a randomized controlled trial could further strengthen the evidence.

Background Neonatal and maternal mortality rates remain high in Kenya. Knowledge of neonatal danger signs may reduce delay in deciding to seek care. Evidence is emerging on the influential role of male partners in improving maternal and newborn health. This study analysed the factors that determine men’s and women’s knowledge and practices in postnatal and neonatal care-seeking, in order to inform design of future interventions. Methods A quantitative, cross-sectional study was undertaken in Bungoma County, Kenya. Women who had recently given birth (n = 348) and men whose wives had recently given birth (n = 82) completed questionnaires on knowledge and care-seeking practices relating to the postnatal period. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate associations with key maternal and newborn health outcomes. Results 51.2% of women and 50.0% of men knew at least one neonatal danger sign, however women knew more individual danger signs than men. In the univariate model, women’s knowledge of a least one neonatal danger sign was associated with attending antenatal care ≥4 times (OR 4.46, 95%CI 2.73-7.29, p<0.001), facility birth (OR 3.26, 95%CI 1.89- 5.72, p<0.001), and having a male partner accompany them to antenatal care (OR 3.34, 95%CI 1.35-8.27, p = 0.009). Higher monthly household income (≥10,000KSh, approximately US$100) was associated with facility delivery (AOR 11.99, 95%CI 1.59-90.40, p = 0.009). Conclusion Knowledge of neonatal danger signs was low, however there was an association between knowledge of danger signs and increased healthcare service use, including male partner involvement in antenatal care. Future interventions should consider the extra costs of facility delivery and the barriers to men participating in antenatal and postnatal care.

This is a descriptive cross-sectional survey of women and men involved in the ‘Collaborative Newborn Support Project’, Kenya [31]. The study was undertaken in Bungoma County, Kenya. Bungoma County is located in Western Kenya, bordering Uganda, and has a population of 1.67 million people [32], mostly subsistence farmers [31], with only 11.3% of the population live in urban areas (2019 census) [33]. The project team believed it important to assess knowledge attitudes and practices of rural populations who were potential users of the hospitals in the broader project. Women and men from the same geographic area were recruited independently, meaning that the responses to each questionnaire are not linked as mother-father dyads. In total, 82 men and 348 women participated in the study, based on the data collection resources available to the project team. Men whose female partners had delivered within the previous one year (between April 2016 and April 2017) were recruited through convenience sampling, from those accompanying their female partners to healthcare clinics, and from men in market centres that fell within the regular catchment area of the facilities involved in the ‘Collaborative Newborn Support Project’, Kenya [31]. Women who had recently delivered were recruited at antenatal and postnatal reproductive care units, and in maternal and child health clinics at two health facilities: Bungoma and Webuye hospitals. These facilities were purposively sampled, based on the fact that they are County and Sub-County referral hospitals respectively, and involved in the broader project intervention. Two questionnaires were administered, one to the women’s sample and the other to the men’s sample. These were adapted and abridged from the JHPIEGO birth preparedness and complication readiness tool sample questionnaires [9]. Both questionnaires covered basic socio-demographic factors and asked similar questions about knowledge, attitudes and practices relating to maternal and newborn health; however, these weren’t identical between the two surveys. Specific questions on danger signs in the postnatal period for woman or newborn classified these as Vaginal bleeding, Neo-natal sepsis, Jaundice, Convulsions, Asphyxia, High fever, Congenital problems, Difficulty breathing, Severe weakness, Changed activity, Bleeding umbilical cord, Poor breastfeeding, and free-text fields for other options. Data were collected by research assistants over a three-month period in 2017. The questionnaires were in English and Kiswahili. Research assistants translated the questions into local dialect whenever necessary. Following collection, the data were transferred to an Access database and archived in Mount Kenya University servers within the Directorate of Research and Innovation. The data were cleaned and analysed using Stata 13 [34] to find summary statistics and to undertake univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Complete case analysis was used in regression analyses. Some variables were grouped to dichotomous responses, based on analysis team consensus, to ensure no group was too small for regression analysis. The common approach of interpreting a p-value of less than 0.05 as indicating statistical significance was taken. Although questions were not completely uniform across the two questionnaires, where possible we used similar variables across both data sets in the analysis to allow the contrast of women’s and men’s knowledge and practices. Outcome variables examined in the logistic regression analysis covered both knowledge and practices. There was insufficient variability in the data to include attitudes in the final analysis. Univariate associations were tested between outcome variables and hypothesised factors of association, as determined by similar studies and the availability of data from the questionnaires. These were then included in a multivariate model to control for the effects of confounding. Potential confounding factors included in the women’s multivariate model were women’s and men’s age and education levels, monthly household income, time to healthcare facility, gravidity, age at first pregnancy and shared decision making for health service seeking between woman and male partner. Potential confounding factors included in the men’s multivariate model were women’s and men’s age and education level, and monthly household income. Outcomes considered to be on the causal pathway between exposure and outcome were included in univariate models, but not in multivariate models. This study was approved by the Mount Kenya University Ethics Review Committee (MKU/ERC/0096). Participants signed informed consent forms after the aims and research process were explained to them, prior to undertaking the questionnaire.

Based on the information provided, here are some potential innovations that could be recommended to improve access to maternal health:

1. Male Partner Involvement: Encourage and promote the involvement of male partners in antenatal and postnatal care. This can be done through educational campaigns, community outreach programs, and by creating a supportive environment for male partners to participate in healthcare decision-making.

2. Knowledge Enhancement: Develop and implement educational programs to improve knowledge of neonatal danger signs among both men and women. This can include providing information on common danger signs, their implications, and the appropriate actions to take in case of emergencies.

3. Antenatal Care Attendance: Promote regular attendance of antenatal care visits, as it has been associated with increased knowledge of neonatal danger signs. This can be achieved through community-based initiatives, such as mobile clinics, transportation support, and awareness campaigns highlighting the importance of antenatal care.

4. Facility Birth: Encourage facility births, as it has been linked to higher knowledge of neonatal danger signs. This can be done by improving access to healthcare facilities, ensuring the availability of skilled birth attendants, and addressing any financial barriers that may prevent women from seeking facility-based care.

5. Income Support: Provide financial support or incentives to women with lower household incomes to encourage facility delivery. This can help alleviate the extra costs associated with facility births and ensure that all women have equal access to quality maternal healthcare.

6. Community Engagement: Engage the community in promoting maternal health by involving local leaders, community health workers, and traditional birth attendants. This can help raise awareness, address cultural beliefs and practices that may hinder access to maternal healthcare, and ensure that information reaches all segments of the population.

It is important to note that these recommendations are based on the specific findings of the study mentioned and may need to be adapted to the local context and resources available.
AI Innovations Description
The study titled “Men’s and women’s knowledge of danger signs relevant to postnatal and neonatal careseeking: A cross-sectional study from Bungoma County, Kenya” aimed to analyze the factors that determine men’s and women’s knowledge and practices in postnatal and neonatal care-seeking in order to inform the design of future interventions to improve access to maternal health.

The study was conducted in Bungoma County, Kenya, which is located in Western Kenya and has a population of 1.67 million people. The majority of the population are subsistence farmers, and only 11.3% live in urban areas.

A total of 82 men and 348 women participated in the study. Men were recruited through convenience sampling, from those accompanying their female partners to healthcare clinics, and from men in market centers within the catchment area of the facilities involved in the study. Women who had recently delivered were recruited at antenatal and postnatal reproductive care units in two health facilities: Bungoma and Webuye hospitals.

Questionnaires were administered to both men and women, covering basic socio-demographic factors and asking questions about knowledge, attitudes, and practices relating to maternal and newborn health. The questionnaires included specific questions on danger signs in the postnatal period for women and newborns.

The data collected were analyzed using statistical software. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate associations between key maternal and newborn health outcomes and factors such as knowledge of danger signs, attendance at antenatal care, facility birth, male partner involvement in antenatal care, and monthly household income.

The study found that knowledge of neonatal danger signs was low among both men and women. However, there was an association between knowledge of danger signs and increased healthcare service use, including male partner involvement in antenatal care. Higher monthly household income was also associated with facility delivery.

Based on these findings, the study recommends that future interventions to improve access to maternal health should consider the extra costs of facility delivery and the barriers to men participating in antenatal and postnatal care. It suggests that increasing knowledge of danger signs and promoting male partner involvement in antenatal care could help reduce delays in seeking care and improve maternal and newborn health outcomes.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided description, here are some potential recommendations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Increase awareness and education: Develop targeted educational campaigns to raise awareness among both men and women about the importance of maternal and neonatal health, including knowledge of danger signs. This can be done through community outreach programs, workshops, and the use of media platforms.

2. Involve male partners in antenatal care: Encourage male partners to accompany women to antenatal care visits. This can help increase their knowledge and understanding of maternal and neonatal health, as well as promote shared decision-making in seeking healthcare services.

3. Improve access to antenatal care: Enhance the availability and accessibility of antenatal care services, particularly in rural areas. This can be achieved by establishing mobile clinics, increasing the number of healthcare facilities, and ensuring that healthcare providers are adequately trained.

4. Strengthen postnatal care services: Focus on improving postnatal care services to ensure that women and newborns receive appropriate care and support during the critical postpartum period. This can include providing home visits by healthcare professionals, promoting breastfeeding support, and addressing postnatal danger signs.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could be developed as follows:

1. Define the indicators: Identify key indicators that reflect access to maternal health, such as the percentage of women attending antenatal care, the percentage of facility births, and the percentage of women and men with knowledge of neonatal danger signs.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather baseline data on the selected indicators from the target population. This can be done through surveys, interviews, or existing data sources.

3. Develop a simulation model: Create a simulation model that incorporates the identified recommendations and their potential impact on the selected indicators. This model should consider factors such as population size, geographical distribution, and existing healthcare infrastructure.

4. Input data and run simulations: Input the baseline data into the simulation model and run multiple simulations to assess the potential impact of the recommendations. This can involve adjusting variables such as the percentage of male partners accompanying women to antenatal care or the availability of postnatal care services.

5. Analyze results: Analyze the results of the simulations to determine the projected changes in the selected indicators. This can be done by comparing the baseline data with the simulated data and calculating the percentage change or other relevant metrics.

6. Validate the model: Validate the simulation model by comparing the simulated results with real-world data, if available. This can help ensure the accuracy and reliability of the model.

7. Refine and iterate: Based on the results and validation, refine the simulation model and repeat the process to further assess the impact of the recommendations. This iterative approach can help refine the recommendations and identify potential challenges or limitations.

It is important to note that the methodology outlined above is a general framework and can be adapted based on the specific context and available resources.

Partagez ceci :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email