Markers of environmental enteric dysfunction are associated with poor growth and iron status in rural ugandan infants

listen audio

Study Justification:
This study aimed to investigate the association between environmental enteric dysfunction (EED), systemic inflammation (SI), growth, and iron status in infants from low-resource settings. EED, characterized by altered intestinal permeability/inflammation, microbial translocation, and SI, is believed to contribute to poor growth and micronutrient deficiencies in infants. Understanding these associations can provide valuable insights into the mechanisms by which EED affects infant health and development.
Study Highlights:
– The study included 548 6-month-old infants from rural Uganda.
– Approximately 35% of infants were stunted (length-for-age z score < -2) and 53% were anemic (hemoglobin < 11.0 g/dL).
– EED and SI biomarkers were significantly correlated.
– Higher concentrations of anti-flagellin and anti-LPS immunoglobulins (Igs) were associated with lower length-for-age z scores and lower hemoglobin levels.
– Higher concentrations of anti-flagellin and anti-LPS Igs were also associated with higher soluble transferrin receptor levels, indicating poorer iron status.

Study Recommendations:
Based on the findings, the study recommends further research on the mechanisms by which EED affects growth and micronutrient status in infants. Understanding these mechanisms can help develop targeted interventions to improve infant health and development in low-resource settings.

Key Role Players:
1. Researchers: Conduct further research to understand the mechanisms of EED and its impact on growth and iron status in infants.
2. Health practitioners: Implement interventions to prevent and manage EED in infants, focusing on improving intestinal health and reducing systemic inflammation.
3. Policy makers: Incorporate strategies to address EED in existing maternal and child health programs, including promoting breastfeeding, improving sanitation and hygiene practices, and providing access to nutritious foods.
4. Community health workers: Educate caregivers about the importance of proper nutrition, hygiene, and sanitation practices to prevent EED in infants.

Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
1. Research funding: Allocate resources for conducting further research on EED and its impact on infant health and development.
2. Intervention implementation: Budget for implementing interventions to prevent and manage EED, including training health practitioners, providing necessary equipment and supplies, and monitoring program effectiveness.
3. Health education materials: Develop and distribute educational materials for caregivers to raise awareness about EED and promote healthy practices.
4. Program monitoring and evaluation: Allocate funds for monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of interventions targeting EED in infants.

Please note that the cost items provided are general categories and not actual cost estimates. The specific costs will depend on the context and scale of the interventions implemented.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is moderately strong. The study is based on a cross-sectional analysis of 548 infants in a Ugandan birth-cohort study, which provides a good sample size. The study examines associations among environmental enteric dysfunction (EED), systemic inflammation (SI), growth, and iron status. The associations between EED biomarkers and growth and iron status are statistically significant. However, the study is limited to a single time point and does not establish causality. To improve the strength of the evidence, future research could include longitudinal studies to establish temporal relationships and explore the mechanisms by which EED affects growth and micronutrient status.

Background: Environmental enteric dysfunction (EED), characterized by altered intestinal permeability/inflammation, microbial translocation, and systemic inflammation (SI), may be a significant contributor to micronutrient deficiencies and poor growth in infants from low-resource settings. Objective: We examined associations among EED, SI, growth, and iron status at 6 mo of age. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 6-mo-old infants (n = 548) enrolled in a Ugandan birth-cohort study (NCT04233944). EED was assessed via serum concentrations of anti-flagellin and anti- LPS immunoglobulins (Igs); SI was assessed via serum concentrations of a1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) and C-reactive protein (CRP); iron status was assessed via serum concentrations of hemoglobin (Hb), soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR), and ferritin. Associations were assessed using adjusted linear regression analysis. Results: At 6 mo, ∼35% of infants were stunted [length-for-age z score (LAZ) < −2] and ∼53% were anemic [hemoglobin (Hb) 1 g/L) and ∼30% had elevated CRP (>5 mg/L). EED and SI biomarkers were significantly correlated (r = 0.142-0.193, P < 0.001 for all). In adjusted linear regression models, which included adjustments for SI, higher anti-flagellin IgA, anti-LPS IgA, and anti-LPS IgG concentrations were each significantly associated with lower LAZ [β (95% CI): −0.21 (−0.41, 0.00), −0.23 (−0.44, −0.03), and −0.33 (−0.58, −0.09)]. Furthermore, higher anti-flagellin IgA, anti-flagellin IgG, and anti-LPS IgA concentrations were significantly associated with lower Hb [β (95% CI): −0.24 (−0.45, −0.02), −0.58 (−1.13, 0.00), and −0.26 (−0.51, 0.00)] and higher anti-flagellin IgG and anti-LPS IgG concentrations were significantly associated with higher sTfR [β (95% CI): 2.31 (0.34, 4.28) and 3.13 (0.75, 5.51)]. Conclusions: EED is associated with both low LAZ and iron status in 6-mo-old infants. Further research on the mechanisms by which EED affects growth and micronutrient status is warranted.

Study approval was obtained from the Makerere University Research Ethics Committee at the School of Public Health in Kampala, Uganda; the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology in Kampala, Uganda; the Tufts Health Sciences Institutional Review Board in Boston, Massachusetts; and the Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health Institutional Review Board in Boston, Massachusetts. Written consent was obtained from all mothers prior to enrollment. Participants in this observational, cross-sectional study were a subset of infants enrolled in a birth-cohort study, the Uganda Birth Cohort Study (UBCS; {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT04233944","term_id":"NCT04233944"}}NCT04233944). The UBCS, which was conducted from 2014 to 2016 by the US Agency for International Development (USAID) Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Nutrition at Tufts University, recruited and followed ∼5000 pregnant women in 16 subcounties in rural southwestern (Bugangari, Buyanja, Bwizi, Kebisoni, Kibiito, Nyamweru, Rugyeyo, and Ruhija) and northern (Aduku, Agoro, Agweng, Apac, Atanga, Atyak, Ayer, and Parombo) Uganda. Home visits were conducted every 3 mo from pregnancy until the infant turned 6 mo of age. Extensive household, maternal, and infant data were collected within the UBCS, including in-depth information on demographics, household characteristics, agricultural production, WASH practices, food security [using the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS)] (34), nutritional and health status of women through pregnancy, birth outcomes, and anthropometry for women and their infants. Maternal height and infant length were measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a portable height board (ShorrBoard® infant/child/adult portable height-length measuring board; Weigh and Measure, LLC); weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using an electronic scale (Seca model 874; Seca Corporation). All anthropometry measurements were taken in triplicate and averaged. Hb concentrations were measured at 6 mo of age using a finger-prick blood sample and a portable hemoglobinometer (HemoCue 301; HemoCue America). Blood samples for biomarker analysis were collected via venipuncture by a trained phlebotomist (BD Vacutainer; Becton Dickinson). Samples were then transported on ice to facility laboratories, where serum was separated, placed into aliquots, and frozen at −20°C. The flow diagram for the study is presented in Figure 1. Of the 5044 households enrolled in the UBCS, 1700 had a maternal serum sample collected at birth and an infant sample collected at 6 mo of age. From these, infant serum samples from the 6-mo visit with adequate sample volume (n = 781) were selected and analyzed for anti-flagellin and anti-LPS Igs; 688 were further analyzed for biomarkers of SI and iron status. Infants missing 6-mo covariate/anthropometry data (n = 140) were excluded from analysis. A total of 548 infants were therefore included in this study. Of these, 488 infants had Hb assessed at 6 mo of age. Flow diagram for cross-sectional study of infants from northern and southwestern Uganda. EED, environmental enteric dysfunction; SI, systemic inflammation; UBCS, Uganda Birth Cohort Study. Serum samples were analyzed for concentrations of anti-flagellin and anti-LPS IgA and IgG at Georgia State University (Atlanta, GA) via previously described ELISA methods (25). Briefly, serum samples were diluted 1:200 and applied to wells coated with either flagellin (100 ng/well) or LPS (2 μg/well). Wells were then incubated with anti-human IgA (KPL) or IgG (GE Healthcare) coupled to HRP. The quantification of total Igs was conducted using the colorimetric peroxidase substrate tetramethylbenzidine, and absorbance [optical density (OD)] was read at 450 nm using an ELISA plate reader. Concentrations of serum biomarkers are reported as OD-corrected data; higher values suggest increased intestinal permeability and microbial translocation indicative of EED. Samples were further analyzed for AGP, CRP, sTfR, and ferritin at the VitMin Lab in Willstaett, Germany, via previously described sandwich ELISA methods (35). Ferritin and sTfR were adjusted for inflammation using the Biomarkers Reflecting Inflammation and Nutritional Determinants of Anemia (BRINDA) method (36). Background characteristics, including household, maternal, and infant characteristics, were calculated and presented as means ± SDs or n (%) for continuous and categorical outcomes, respectively. Growth outcomes at 6 mo of age, including LAZ, WAZ, and WLZ, were calculated using the WHO Multicenter Growth Reference Study growth standards (1). Outliers, defined as LAZ <6 or ≥6, WAZ <6 or ≥5, and WLZ <5 or ≥5, were set to missing. EED, SI, and iron status biomarker concentrations are presented as medians (IQRs). Mann-Whitney U tests were used to assess differences in biomarker concentrations between moderately (< −2 to ≥ −3 SDs) and severely (< −3 SDs) stunted infants and infants ≥ −1 SD. Because of their skewed distribution, EED and SI biomarkers were ln-transformed prior to correlation and regression analyses. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to assess relations between EED biomarkers (anti-flagellin and anti-LPS IgA and IgG) and SI biomarkers (AGP and CRP). Adjusted linear regression models were used to assess the association between EED and SI biomarkers and infant growth. Adjusted models controlled for significant predictors of LAZ at 6 mo of age (P < 0.10 in unadjusted analyses), including maternal age, maternal height, household head educational level, infant sex, infant birth weight, household food security status (HFIAS), improved water source (yes/no), AGP (EED models only), and subcounty clustering. Finally, adjusted linear regression models, controlling for infant sex, age, and subcounty clustering, were developed to assess the association between EED biomarkers and iron status biomarkers, including Hb (grams/deciliter), inflammation-adjusted sTfR (milligrams/liter), and inflammation-adjusted ferritin (micrograms/liter). All statistical analyses were carried out using STATA 15 software (StataCorp). For all analyses, a P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Based on the provided information, here are some potential innovations that could improve access to maternal health:

1. Mobile Health (mHealth) Applications: Develop mobile applications that provide pregnant women with access to important information and resources related to maternal health. These apps can provide guidance on prenatal care, nutrition, and breastfeeding, as well as reminders for appointments and medication.

2. Telemedicine Services: Implement telemedicine services that allow pregnant women in remote or underserved areas to consult with healthcare professionals through video calls. This can help address the lack of healthcare providers in certain regions and provide timely advice and support to pregnant women.

3. Community Health Workers: Train and deploy community health workers who can provide basic prenatal care, education, and support to pregnant women in their communities. These workers can help identify high-risk pregnancies, provide health screenings, and refer women to appropriate healthcare facilities when necessary.

4. Maternal Health Vouchers: Introduce voucher programs that provide pregnant women with financial assistance to access quality maternal healthcare services. These vouchers can cover the cost of prenatal visits, delivery, and postnatal care, ensuring that women have access to essential services regardless of their financial situation.

5. Mobile Clinics: Set up mobile clinics that travel to remote areas, bringing maternal healthcare services directly to pregnant women who may not have easy access to healthcare facilities. These clinics can provide prenatal check-ups, vaccinations, and health education to improve maternal and infant health outcomes.

6. Health Education Campaigns: Launch targeted health education campaigns that raise awareness about the importance of prenatal care, nutrition, and hygiene practices during pregnancy. These campaigns can be conducted through various media channels, including radio, television, and social media, to reach a wide audience.

7. Improved Transportation Infrastructure: Invest in improving transportation infrastructure in rural areas to ensure that pregnant women can easily access healthcare facilities. This can involve building or upgrading roads, bridges, and transportation networks to reduce travel time and increase accessibility.

8. Maternal Health Insurance: Establish or expand health insurance programs that specifically cover maternal healthcare services. This can help reduce financial barriers and ensure that pregnant women can receive the necessary care without incurring high out-of-pocket expenses.

9. Maternal Health Monitoring Systems: Develop innovative monitoring systems that track the health status of pregnant women and provide real-time data to healthcare providers. These systems can help identify high-risk pregnancies, monitor progress, and enable timely interventions to prevent complications.

10. Public-Private Partnerships: Foster collaborations between the public and private sectors to improve access to maternal healthcare. This can involve partnering with private healthcare providers to expand services in underserved areas or leveraging private sector resources and expertise to implement innovative solutions for maternal health.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the provided description, the recommendation to improve access to maternal health is to conduct further research on the mechanisms by which environmental enteric dysfunction (EED) affects growth and micronutrient status in infants. This research can help identify effective interventions and strategies to prevent and manage EED, ultimately improving maternal and child health outcomes. Additionally, it is important to prioritize access to clean water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) practices, as they play a crucial role in preventing EED. Implementing WASH interventions in low-resource settings can help reduce the risk of EED and its associated complications.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided description, here are some potential recommendations for improving access to maternal health:

1. Strengthening healthcare infrastructure: Investing in the development and improvement of healthcare facilities, including hospitals, clinics, and maternity centers, in rural areas of Uganda. This would ensure that pregnant women have access to quality healthcare services closer to their homes.

2. Mobile health clinics: Implementing mobile health clinics that can travel to remote areas and provide prenatal care, maternal health check-ups, and education on nutrition and hygiene practices. This would help reach pregnant women who may have limited access to healthcare facilities.

3. Telemedicine services: Introducing telemedicine services that allow pregnant women to consult with healthcare professionals remotely. This would enable women in rural areas to receive medical advice and guidance without the need for travel.

4. Community health workers: Training and deploying community health workers who can provide basic maternal healthcare services, conduct health education sessions, and identify high-risk pregnancies in rural communities. This would improve access to essential care and early detection of potential complications.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Define the indicators: Identify key indicators that measure access to maternal health, such as the number of prenatal visits, percentage of births attended by skilled healthcare professionals, and maternal mortality rates.

2. Data collection: Gather baseline data on the identified indicators from the target population, including information on healthcare utilization, distance to healthcare facilities, and demographic characteristics.

3. Model development: Develop a simulation model that incorporates the baseline data and simulates the impact of the recommended interventions on the identified indicators. This model should consider factors such as population size, geographical distribution, and existing healthcare infrastructure.

4. Intervention implementation: Input the parameters of the recommended interventions into the simulation model and run the simulation to estimate the potential impact on the indicators. This could involve adjusting variables such as the number of healthcare facilities, the frequency of mobile health clinic visits, or the coverage of telemedicine services.

5. Analysis and interpretation: Analyze the simulation results to assess the projected changes in the indicators of access to maternal health. Interpret the findings to understand the potential benefits and limitations of the recommended interventions.

6. Sensitivity analysis: Conduct sensitivity analysis to test the robustness of the simulation model by varying key parameters and assessing the impact on the results. This helps identify the most influential factors and potential uncertainties in the simulation.

7. Policy recommendations: Based on the simulation results, provide evidence-based recommendations for policymakers and stakeholders to guide decision-making and prioritize interventions that can effectively improve access to maternal health.

It is important to note that the methodology described above is a general framework and may require customization based on the specific context and available data.

Partagez ceci :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email