Exploring community participation in project design: application of the community conversation approach to improve maternal and newborn health in Zambia

listen audio

Study Justification:
– The study aimed to explore community participation in project design to improve maternal and newborn health in Zambia.
– The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has adopted the Community Conversation (CC) approach to improve community engagement in addressing health challenges.
– The study sought to apply the CC approach in three rural districts of Zambia to develop community-generated interventions.
– The study aimed to identify barriers to accessing maternal health services and gather community solutions to address these challenges.
Highlights:
– The study found that major barriers to accessing maternal health services included geography, limited infrastructure, lack of knowledge, shortage of human resources and essential commodities, and insufficient involvement of male partners.
– Lack of information and misconceptions, as well as inadequately trained health workers with poor attitudes, negatively affected access to maternal health services.
– Seventeen out of twenty communities suggested solutions, including targeted community sensitization on safe motherhood, family planning, and prevention of teenage pregnancy.
– Community members and key stakeholders committed time and resources to address these challenges with minimal external support.
– The CC approach functioned as an advocacy platform to engage key decision-makers within the community and align priorities while incorporating community views.
Recommendations:
– Targeted community sensitization on the importance of safe motherhood, family planning, and prevention of teenage pregnancy.
– Strengthening health worker training and improving attitudes towards maternal health services.
– Addressing geographical barriers and improving infrastructure in rural areas.
– Enhancing male partner involvement in maternal health.
– Continued support for community-led interventions and engagement of key stakeholders.
Key Role Players:
– Community members
– Health facility staff
– Traditional leaders
– Politicians
– District officials
– Researchers/Project coordinators
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Community sensitization materials (e.g., brochures, posters)
– Training programs for health workers
– Infrastructure development (e.g., construction of health facilities, transportation improvements)
– Communication and outreach activities
– Monitoring and evaluation tools and personnel
– Administrative and coordination costs

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is based on a study conducted in three rural districts of Zambia using the Community Conversation (CC) approach. The study collected data through 60 CCs held in three target districts, covering a total of 20 health facilities. The conversations were digitally recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using NVivo version 10. The study identified major barriers to accessing maternal health services and suggested community-generated solutions. The evidence is based on primary data collected through a systematic approach, which adds to its strength. However, the abstract does not provide information on the sample size, representativeness of the communities, or the specific methodology used for data analysis. To improve the evidence, the abstract should include more details on the sample size, sampling method, and data analysis techniques used. Additionally, it would be helpful to provide information on the generalizability of the findings and any limitations of the study.

BACKGROUND: The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has adopted an approach entitled Community Conversation (CC) to improve community engagement in addressing health challenges. CCs are based on Paulo Freire’s transformative communication approach, in which communities pose problems and critically examine their everyday life experiences through discussion. We adopted this approach to engage communities in maternal and newborn health discussions in three rural districts of Zambia, with the aim of developing community-generated interventions. METHODS: Sixty (60) CCs were held in three target districts, covering a total of 20 health facilities. Communities were purposively selected in each district to capture a range of rural and peri-urban areas at varying distances from health facilities. Conversations were held four times in each community between May and September 2014. All conversations were digitally recorded and later transcribed. NVivo version 10 was used for data analysis. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The major barriers to accessing maternal health services included geography, limited infrastructure, lack of knowledge, shortage of human resources and essential commodities, and insufficient involvement of male partners. From the demand side, a lack of information and misconceptions, and, from the supply side, inadequately trained health workers with poor attitudes, negatively affected access to maternal health services in target districts either directly or indirectly. At least 17 of 20 communities suggested solutions to these challenges, including targeted community sensitisation on the importance of safe motherhood, family planning and prevention of teenage pregnancy. Community members and key stakeholders committed time and resources to address these challenges with minimal external support. CONCLUSION: We successfully applied the CC approach to explore maternal health challenges in three rural districts of Zambia. CCs functioned as an advocacy platform to facilitate direct engagement with key decision makers within the community and to align priorities while incorporating community views. There was a general lack of knowledge about safe motherhood and family planning in all three districts. However, other problems were unique to health facilities, demonstrating the need for tailored interventions.

Zambia has predominantly free health care services, with only a few private providers in urban areas. Government policy encourages women to attend at least 4 antenatal care (ANC) visits during a single pregnancy and to deliver in health facilities attended by qualified health personnel. Current statistics indicate that 66% of births occur in a health facility, while 31% occur at home; births in urban areas are more likely to be at a health facility (89%) than births in rural areas (56%). Socio-cultural and structural factors, as well as a lack of knowledge of maternal and newborn care, act as barriers to seeking health care among families, particularly those in rural areas [4]. The BHOMA II project was a community intervention funded by Comic Relief to address maternal and newborn health in three districts in Zambia. BHOMA II was a follow-on to BHOMA I, which focused mainly on strengthening the health system in the same districts. CCs were held as part of the baseline activities of BHOMA II to facilitate the design of appropriate interventions while accounting for community concerns. This paper focuses on this baseline assessment. CCs were expected to be repeated again after 12 months of intervention. CCs were used to collect information in relation to maternal and newborn health in three rural districts of Zambia. The goal of the CC was to establish baseline challenges to address during the 12-month intervention period. After 12 months, CCs were designed to be repeated to assess the extent to which the interventions had addressed the baseline challenges. The questions were tailored to elicit challenges to maternal and newborn health and to establish actual and latent local responses that capitalised on strengths existing within the community. CC facilitators were trained community residents who were familiar with the local context and the languages spoken in target communities. Sixty (60) CCs were held in three target districts. Communities served by 10 health facilities in Chongwe, 4 in Luangwa and 6 in Kafue were purposively selected to participate in CCs. Purposive sampling within each district was performed to ensure representation of rural and peri-urban areas that were pre-determined varying distances from a health facility. Three of the sites were classified as peri-urban, while the remaining 57 were considered rural. Distance from health facilities was used as one of the criteria for community selection to capture a representative spectrum of the challenges facing communities in maternal and child health. Four sessions were held in each community between May and September 2014, consisting of three CCs and one validation session that followed standard procedures [2]. The first CC session focused on exploring issues that affected communities in relation to family planning, ANC attendance, labour and postnatal services. The second session explored in detail the specific themes and challenges identified in the first session. Session three summarised the issues raised and allowed participants to suggest related solutions and community contributions to enacting these solutions. Session four was a validation session in which key stakeholders such as district and health centre staff, traditional leaders and politicians were informed of the issues discovered in the preceding three CCs and invited to provide suggestions on how these issues could be best addressed. The conversations lasted approximately 2 h each, and both men and women participated in each conversation. The questions focused on maternal and child health and explored the following themes: Within each theme, we explored some of the perceived benefits of health care service utilisation and the underlying causes for failure to use these services. In addition, community responses to the challenges were discussed, which led to summary action plans with clear roles for the community and the project. We used a fishbone diagram to graphically summarise the linkages between challenges and outcomes. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and coded inductively. Three research assistants trained in qualitative methods transcribed the interviews. Transcripts were cleaned and exported to NVivo 10 (QSR International; Melbourne, Australia) for analysis. Two of the authors (WM and RC) reviewed the interview transcripts, validated the pre-determined themes and identified additional themes and subthemes that emerged. Two researchers coded the data, and Cohen’s Kappa statistic was used to assess inter-coder reliability [6]. Data were organised by pre-determined themes. These formed the basis for broader themes, which were further sub-categorised to increase the explanatory ability of the data. To ensure that sustainable projects emerged from the data collected, stringent criteria were set a priori, and only proposals that met these criteria were selected for consideration. These criteria included the following: Ethical approval was granted by the University of Zambia Bioethics Committee. Participants were informed about the purpose of the conversations. Verbal consent was obtained from each participant.

Based on the described study, the recommendation to improve access to maternal health is the application of the Community Conversation (CC) approach. The CC approach is a community engagement strategy that involves facilitating discussions among community members to identify and address health challenges. In this case, CCs were used to explore maternal and newborn health challenges in three rural districts of Zambia.

The CCs revealed several barriers to accessing maternal health services, including geography, limited infrastructure, lack of knowledge, shortage of human resources and essential commodities, and insufficient involvement of male partners. To address these challenges, the communities suggested solutions such as targeted community sensitization on the importance of safe motherhood, family planning, and prevention of teenage pregnancy.

The CC approach proved successful in engaging communities and aligning priorities with key decision-makers. It also highlighted the need for tailored interventions, as some challenges were unique to specific health facilities. The CCs functioned as an advocacy platform and facilitated direct engagement with stakeholders, allowing for community-generated interventions.

To implement this recommendation, it is important to train community residents as CC facilitators who are familiar with the local context and languages spoken in the target communities. CC sessions should be held multiple times in each community to allow for in-depth discussions and the development of action plans. Key stakeholders, including district and health center staff, traditional leaders, and politicians, should be involved in validation sessions to provide input and support.

Overall, the CC approach can be a valuable tool for improving access to maternal health by empowering communities to identify and address their specific challenges.
AI Innovations Description
The recommendation to improve access to maternal health based on the described study is the application of the Community Conversation (CC) approach. The CC approach is a community engagement strategy that involves facilitating discussions among community members to identify and address health challenges. In this case, CCs were used to explore maternal and newborn health challenges in three rural districts of Zambia.

The CCs revealed several barriers to accessing maternal health services, including geography, limited infrastructure, lack of knowledge, shortage of human resources and essential commodities, and insufficient involvement of male partners. To address these challenges, the communities suggested solutions such as targeted community sensitization on the importance of safe motherhood, family planning, and prevention of teenage pregnancy.

The CC approach proved successful in engaging communities and aligning priorities with key decision-makers. It also highlighted the need for tailored interventions, as some challenges were unique to specific health facilities. The CCs functioned as an advocacy platform and facilitated direct engagement with stakeholders, allowing for community-generated interventions.

To implement this recommendation, it is important to train community residents as CC facilitators who are familiar with the local context and languages spoken in the target communities. CC sessions should be held multiple times in each community to allow for in-depth discussions and the development of action plans. Key stakeholders, including district and health center staff, traditional leaders, and politicians, should be involved in validation sessions to provide input and support.

Overall, the CC approach can be a valuable tool for improving access to maternal health by empowering communities to identify and address their specific challenges.
AI Innovations Methodology
To simulate the impact of the main recommendations of this abstract on improving access to maternal health, you can follow these steps:

1. Identify the target communities: Select the communities in which you want to implement the Community Conversation (CC) approach. Consider factors such as rural or peri-urban areas, distance from health facilities, and representation of different challenges.

2. Train CC facilitators: Identify community residents who are familiar with the local context and languages spoken in the target communities. Provide them with training on facilitating CC sessions, including communication skills, facilitation techniques, and knowledge of maternal health issues.

3. Conduct CC sessions: Hold multiple CC sessions in each community, following the structure outlined in the abstract. These sessions should include discussions on barriers to accessing maternal health services and potential solutions. Encourage active participation from both men and women in the community.

4. Record and transcribe conversations: Digitally record all CC sessions and later transcribe them. This will allow for accurate analysis and identification of key themes and challenges.

5. Analyze data: Use qualitative data analysis software, such as NVivo, to analyze the transcribed conversations. Identify common barriers and solutions mentioned by the community members.

6. Develop action plans: Based on the analysis of the CC sessions, develop action plans that address the identified challenges. These action plans should include specific steps and roles for the community and the project.

7. Involve key stakeholders: Organize validation sessions where key stakeholders, such as district and health center staff, traditional leaders, and politicians, are invited to provide input and support. Incorporate their suggestions into the action plans.

8. Implement interventions: Implement the community-generated interventions outlined in the action plans. This may involve targeted community sensitization on safe motherhood, family planning, and prevention of teenage pregnancy. Ensure that resources and support are provided to the community to carry out these interventions.

9. Monitor and evaluate: Continuously monitor the progress and impact of the interventions. Collect data on indicators such as ANC attendance, facility-based deliveries, and knowledge of maternal health. Evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions in improving access to maternal health services.

10. Repeat CC sessions: After a specified period (e.g., 12 months), repeat the CC sessions to assess the extent to which the interventions have addressed the baseline challenges. Use the same methodology to collect data and compare the findings with the initial CC sessions.

By following this methodology, you can simulate the impact of the main recommendations of the abstract on improving access to maternal health in your target communities.

Partagez ceci :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email