Inpatient care of small and sick newborns: A multi-country analysis of health system bottlenecks and potential solutions

listen audio

Study Justification:
– Preterm birth is the leading cause of child death worldwide.
– Small and sick newborns require timely, high-quality inpatient care to survive.
– Many newborns do not have access to specialized care, leading to high mortality rates.
– This study aims to identify health system bottlenecks and potential solutions to improve inpatient care for small and sick newborns.
Highlights:
– The study used quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze data from 12 countries in Africa and Asia.
– Health workforce and health financing were identified as the major bottlenecks in providing inpatient care.
– Priority actions were identified to address these bottlenecks, including the need for a neonatal nursing cadre and increased funding with specific insurance schemes.
– Community interventions are needed to create demand for accessible, high-quality inpatient care.
Recommendations:
– Establish a neonatal nursing cadre to improve the quality of inpatient care for small and sick newborns.
– Increase funding for inpatient care, including specific insurance schemes to avoid out-of-pocket payments.
– Define core competencies for monitoring newborn inpatient care.
– Implement community interventions to create demand for high-quality inpatient care, including kangaroo mother care.
Key Role Players:
– National ministries of health
– UN agencies
– Private sector
– Non-governmental organizations (NGOs)
– Professional bodies
– Academia
– Bilateral agencies
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Funding for training and recruitment of neonatal nurses
– Budget for increased funding for inpatient care, including insurance schemes
– Resources for defining core competencies for monitoring newborn inpatient care
– Investment in community interventions to create demand for high-quality inpatient care
Please note that the above information is a summary of the study and may not include all details.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is based on a multi-country analysis using quantitative and qualitative methods. The study used a bottleneck analysis tool and involved technical experts from various stakeholders. The results highlight critical health system challenges and propose priority actions. However, the abstract does not provide specific details about the methodology and sample size, which could be improved.

Background: Preterm birth is the leading cause of child death worldwide. Small and sick newborns require timely, high-quality inpatient care to survive. This includes provision of warmth, feeding support, safe oxygen therapy and effective phototherapy with prevention and treatment of infections. Inpatient care for newborns requires dedicated ward space, staffed by health workers with specialist training and skills. Many of the estimated 2.8 million newborns that die every year do not have access to such specialised care. Methods: The bottleneck analysis tool was applied in 12 countries in Africa and Asia as part of the Every Newborn Action Plan process. Country workshops involved technical experts to complete the survey tool, which is designed to synthesise and grade health system “bottlenecks” (or factors that hinder the scale up) of maternal-newborn intervention packages. For this paper, we used quantitative and qualitative methods to analyse the bottleneck data, and combined these with literature review, to present priority bottlenecks and actions relevant to different health system building blocks for inpatient care of small and sick newborns. Results: Inpatient care of small and sick newborns is an intervention package highlighted by all country workshop participants as having critical health system challenges. Health system building blocks with the highest graded (significant or major) bottlenecks were health workforce (10 out of 12 countries) and health financing (10 out of 12 countries), followed by community ownership and partnership (9 out of 12 countries). Priority actions based on solution themes for these bottlenecks are discussed. Conclusions: Whilst major bottlenecks to the scale-up of quality inpatient newborn care are present, effective solutions exist. For all countries included, there is a critical need for a neonatal nursing cadre. Small and sick newborns require increased, sustained funding with specific insurance schemes to cover inpatient care and avoid catastrophic out-of-pocket payments. Core competencies, by level of care, should be defined for monitoring of newborn inpatient care, as with emergency obstetric care. Rather than fatalism that small and sick newborns will die, community interventions need to create demand for accessible, high-quality, family-centred inpatient care, including kangaroo mother care, so that every newborn can survive and thrive.

This study used quantitative and qualitative research methods to collect information, assess health system bottlenecks and identify solutions to scale up of maternal and newborn care interventions in 12 countries: Afghanistan, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, Uganda, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Vietnam. The maternal-newborn bottleneck analysis tool (additional file 1) was developed to assist countries in the identification of bottlenecks to the scale up and provision of nine maternal and newborn health interventions across the seven health system building blocks as described previously [16,20]. The tool was utilised during a series of national consultations supported by the global Every Newborn Steering Group between July 1st and December 31st, 2013. The workshops for each country included participants from national ministries of health, UN agencies, the private sector, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), professional bodies, academia, bilateral agencies and other stakeholders. For each workshop, a facilitator oriented on the tool coordinated the process and guided groups to reach consensus on the specific bottlenecks for each health system building block. This paper, seventh in the series, focuses on the provision of inpatient care of small and sick newborns. Tracer interventions were defined for each package to focus the workshop discussion. For the purpose of this bottleneck analysis, three interventions required for the treatment of common neonatal conditions were included as tracer items for the package of inpatient care: safe oxygen administration, intragastric tube feeding (IGTF) and the provision of intravenous (IV) fluids (Figure ​(Figure3).3). Oxygen therapy is a mainstay treatment for small and sick babies, with respiratory compromise commonly seen in RDS (following preterm birth, neonatal pneumonia and neonatal sepsis) and respiratory failure being an important mechanism in most neonatal deaths [3]. Developmental immaturity of the preterm newborn (especially those born before 34 weeks gestation), or severe illness in a more mature neonate, may limit their ability to coordinate sucking and swallowing required for successful exclusive breastfeeding. In these instances, intragastric feeding is a commonly used low-tech intervention to deliver nutrition, using expressed breast milk where possible. In addition, many of the most small and sick newborns will require administration of IV fluids to prevent dehydration as a result of insensible water loss, and to manage the delicate fluid, electrolyte and glucose balance, especially in the first days after birth [21,22]. Definitions of tracer indicators for inpatient care of small and sick newborn bottleneck analysis tool. For more details see the complete bottleneck analysis in the additional file 2. Safe implementation and monitoring of these interventions can be challenging, especially in low-resource settings. The list of tracers is not exhaustive and other important interventions, notably, effective phototherapy for the treatment of hyperbilirubinaemia (Figure S2, additional file 2), basic newborn care and resuscitation [12], KMC [13] and management of neonatal sepsis [14] are covered by other sections of the bottleneck analysis tool. Data received from each country were analysed and the graded health system building blocks were converted into heat maps (Figures ​(Figures44 and ​and5).5). Bottlenecks for each health system building block were graded using one of the following options: not a bottleneck (=1), minor bottleneck (=2), significant bottleneck (=3), or very major bottleneck (=4) (Figure ​(Figure5).5). We first present the number of countries from which workshops participants categorised health system bottlenecks as significant or very major, by mortality contexts (Neonatal Mortality Rate (NMR) <30 deaths per 1000 live births and NMR ≥30 deaths per 1000 live births) and region (countries in Africa and countries in Asia) (Figure ​(Figure4).4). We then developed a second heat map showing the specific grading of health system bottlenecks for each country (Figure ​(Figure55). Very major or significant health system bottlenecks for inpatient care of small and sick newborns. NMR: Neonatal Mortality Rate. *Cameroon, Kenya, Malawi, Uganda, Bangladesh, Nepal, Vietnam. **Democratic Republic of Congo, Nigeria, Afghanistan, India, Pakistan. See additional file 2 for more details. Individual country grading of health system bottlenecks for inpatient care of small and sick newborns. Part A: Heat map showing individual country grading of health system bottlenecks for inpatient care of small and sick newborns. Part B: Table showing total number of countries grading significant or major for calculating priority building blocks. DRC: Democratic Republic of the Congo. Context specific solutions to overcome challenges to scaling up inpatient care identified in all countries were categorised into thematic areas and then linked to the specific bottlenecks in the results section (Table ​(Table1/1/ Table S1, additional file 2). We undertook a literature review to identify further case studies and evidence-based solutions for each defined thematic area (Additional file 2). For more detailed analysis of the steps taken to analyse the intervention specific bottlenecks, please refer to the overview paper [20]. Summary of solution themes and proposed actions for inpatient care for small and sick newborns.

Based on the information provided, some potential innovations to improve access to maternal health could include:

1. Neonatal nursing cadre: There is a critical need for a specialized nursing cadre trained in neonatal care. This would ensure that small and sick newborns receive the specialized care they require.

2. Increased funding and specific insurance schemes: Small and sick newborns require increased and sustained funding for inpatient care. Implementing specific insurance schemes can help cover the costs of inpatient care and prevent families from facing catastrophic out-of-pocket payments.

3. Core competencies for monitoring newborn inpatient care: Defining core competencies for monitoring newborn inpatient care can help ensure that the quality of care provided is consistent and effective. This can be done by establishing clear guidelines and training programs for healthcare providers.

4. Community interventions to create demand for accessible care: Community interventions can play a crucial role in creating awareness and demand for accessible, high-quality, family-centered inpatient care. This can include promoting kangaroo mother care and educating communities about the importance of newborn health.

These are just a few potential innovations that can be considered to improve access to maternal health. It is important to note that the specific context and needs of each country should be taken into account when implementing these innovations.
AI Innovations Description
The recommendation to improve access to maternal health based on the study is to address the identified bottlenecks in the health system. The study found that the health workforce and health financing were the two building blocks with the highest graded bottlenecks in providing inpatient care for small and sick newborns.

To address the health workforce bottleneck, there is a critical need for a neonatal nursing cadre. This means training and equipping healthcare professionals with specialized skills and knowledge in caring for small and sick newborns.

In terms of health financing, increased and sustained funding is required, along with specific insurance schemes to cover the cost of inpatient care. This will help avoid catastrophic out-of-pocket payments for families and ensure that all newborns have access to the necessary care.

Additionally, community interventions should be implemented to create demand for accessible, high-quality, family-centered inpatient care. This includes promoting kangaroo mother care, which involves skin-to-skin contact between the mother and newborn to provide warmth and support breastfeeding.

Overall, the study highlights the need for targeted actions to overcome the identified bottlenecks and improve access to inpatient care for small and sick newborns, ultimately contributing to better maternal health outcomes.
AI Innovations Methodology
The study mentioned focuses on improving access to inpatient care for small and sick newborns. To simulate the impact of recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could be developed as follows:

1. Define the recommendations: Based on the findings of the study, identify specific recommendations that can improve access to inpatient care for small and sick newborns. These recommendations could include actions related to health workforce, health financing, community ownership, and partnership.

2. Quantitative analysis: Collect data on the current state of access to maternal health services, including inpatient care for small and sick newborns, in the target countries or regions. This data could include indicators such as the number of health facilities providing inpatient care, the number of trained health workers, and the availability of necessary equipment and supplies.

3. Simulate the impact: Use modeling techniques to simulate the impact of implementing the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This could involve creating scenarios where the recommendations are implemented and comparing them to a baseline scenario without the recommendations. The simulation could consider factors such as the increase in the number of health facilities providing inpatient care, the increase in the number of trained health workers, and the improvement in health financing mechanisms.

4. Measure outcomes: Assess the outcomes of the simulation, such as the increase in the number of women and newborns accessing inpatient care, the reduction in neonatal mortality rates, and the improvement in overall maternal health indicators. These outcomes can be compared between the baseline scenario and the scenario with the implemented recommendations.

5. Refine and iterate: Based on the simulation results, refine the recommendations and iterate the simulation to further optimize the impact on improving access to maternal health. This could involve adjusting the scale or scope of the recommendations, considering additional factors or interventions, or exploring alternative implementation strategies.

By following this methodology, policymakers and stakeholders can gain insights into the potential impact of specific recommendations on improving access to maternal health and make informed decisions on prioritizing and implementing these recommendations.

Partagez ceci :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email