Agricultural and finance intervention increased dietary intake and weight of children living in HIV-affected households in Western Kenya

listen audio

Study Justification:
The study aimed to investigate whether a multisectoral household agricultural and finance intervention could improve the dietary intake and nutritional status of children living in HIV-affected households in Western Kenya. This research was conducted due to the vulnerability of the population in the Nyanza region to food insecurity and the potential for livelihood interventions to positively impact the nutrition of HIV-affected children.
Highlights:
The study found that the intervention group, which received a human-powered water pump, microfinance loan for farm commodities, and training in sustainable farming practices and financial management, experienced significant improvements in dietary intake and weight compared to the control group. Specifically, children in the intervention arm had a larger increase in weight, overall frequency of food consumption, and intakes of staples, fruits and vegetables, meat, and fat.
Recommendations:
Based on the study findings, it is recommended that similar multisectoral interventions be implemented to improve the nutrition of HIV-affected children in other vulnerable regions. These interventions should include components such as access to water, microfinance support, and training in sustainable farming practices and financial management.
Key Role Players:
To address the recommendations, key role players needed may include:
1. Government agencies responsible for agriculture and nutrition programs
2. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) specializing in HIV/AIDS and nutrition
3. Local community leaders and organizations
4. Health professionals and nutritionists
5. Microfinance institutions
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
While the actual cost of implementing the recommendations will vary depending on the specific context and scale of the intervention, some potential cost items to consider in planning include:
1. Procurement and installation of water pumps
2. Microfinance loans for farm commodities
3. Training programs on sustainable farming practices and financial management
4. Monitoring and evaluation activities
5. Outreach and awareness campaigns
6. Staff salaries and operational costs for implementing organizations
7. Research and data collection expenses for impact assessment
Please note that these cost items are provided as examples and should be further assessed and tailored to the specific intervention and local context.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong, but there are some areas for improvement. The study design is randomized and includes a control group, which strengthens the evidence. The sample size is adequate, with 100 children enrolled in each arm. The study measures both dietary intake and anthropometry, providing comprehensive data. The results show statistically significant improvements in weight, frequency of food consumption, and intakes of various food groups in the intervention arm. However, the abstract could be improved by providing more specific information on the effect sizes and confidence intervals for the observed differences. Additionally, it would be helpful to include information on potential limitations of the study, such as any biases or confounding factors that may have influenced the results. Overall, the evidence is strong, but providing more detailed information and addressing potential limitations would further enhance its strength.

We tested whether a multisectoral household agricultural and finance intervention increased the dietary intake and improved the nutritional status of HIV-affected children. Two hospitals in rural Kenya were randomly assigned to be either the intervention or the control arm. The intervention comprised a human-powered water pump, microfinance loan for farm commodities, and training in sustainable farming practices and financial management. In each arm, 100 children (0-59 mo of age) were enrolled from households with HIV-infected adults 18-49 y old. Children were assessed beginning in April 2012 and every 3 mo for 1 y for dietary intake and anthropometry. Children in the intervention arm had a larger increase in weight (β: 0.025 kg/mo, P = 0.030), overall frequency of food consumption (β: 0.610 times · wk-1 · mo-1, P = 0.048), and intakes of staples (β: 0.222, P = 0.024), fruits and vegetables (β: 0.425, P = 0.005), meat (β: 0.074, P 95% members are Luo), and living in dispersed settlements. The major livelihood is subsistence farming and/or fishing, with the major crops for consumption being maize, sorghum, and cassava. The Nyanza region is one of Kenya’s most vulnerable regions to food insecurity because rural poor people do not have enough land and irrigation facilities to do subsistence farming (24). The study design is detailed elsewhere (21, 22). Two rural government district hospitals supported by Family AIDS Care & Education Services were randomly assigned as either intervention or control. The hospitals had similar inpatient, outpatient, emergency, maternal, child, and HIV Care and Treatment services. Both had adequate and similar numbers of adults receiving antiretroviral therapy (2394 in the intervention hospital and 2718 in the control hospital in 2012) with nonoverlapping catchment areas, mitigating contamination; the 2 locations were similar in terms of rainfall patterns, health, topography, water access, soil composition, and socioeconomic status. The intervention had 3 components: 1) the KickStart Water pump and required farm commodities, 2) training in sustainable farming and financial management provided by the Kenyan Ministry of Agriculture, and 3) a small loan ($150) to purchase the water pump and farming implements provided by AdokTimo, a microfinance institution. Control participants received no intervention; they were eligible for the intervention at the end of the 1-y follow-up period. We enrolled through clinic announcements adults who were receiving antiretroviral therapy, aged 18–49 y, with access to farmland and surface water, with moderate-to-severe food insecurity at enrollment or malnutrition during the preceding year, and willing to save the down payment for the loan. A total of 140 HIV-infected adults (72 intervention, 68 control) were enrolled from April to July 2012. The present study recruited all children aged 0–59 mo (biological or legally fostered) living within the households of index adult participants in the parent study (22). We followed children for 1 y every 3 mo, assessing dietary intake, weight, height, and midupper arm circumference (MUAC). In each arm, we enrolled 100 children aged 0–59 mo and their primary caregiver (biological parent or legal guardian aged 18–49 y) living within the households of index adult participants in the parent study. We excluded children with severe acute malnutrition (<−3 z scores of the Standards median) and referred them for immediate care if they were not already in care. We obtained written informed consent from the adult participants for their and for their children's participation. Dietary intake and nutritional status of children were the primary outcomes. Frequency of consumption of food groups was assessed using a questionnaire adapted from the World Food Programme Food Consumption Score. Mothers or caretakers were asked how often the child drank or ate in the past 3 mo each of 63 food items provided in a list. Response options were “every day,” “5–6 times a week,” “3–4 times a week,” “1–2 times a week,” “2–3 times a month,” “once a month,” “less than once a month,” and “never.” Ten food groups were created based on major nutrients present in the food items, adapting guidelines for individual dietary diversity developed by the FAO: staples, legumes, fruits and vegetables, meat, dairy, eggs, fat, sugary foods, condiments (spices, chili, garlic, and royco, which were usually served in small quantities), and tea/coffee (25). Each food group was represented as number of times consumed per week. The frequencies of consumption of all food groups were summed to obtain the overall frequency of consumption. Child nutritional status was assessed as weight, height, and MUAC. Three consecutive weights were measured using a SECA portable electronic scale, which can be adjusted to 0 and weigh quickly and accurately. Three consecutive measurements of standing height for children ≥24 mo of age and length for children <24 mo of age were taken using a length board. Three MUAC measurements using a measuring tape were taken. If the difference between the first 2 measurements was <0.3 kg or <0.3 cm, the mean of the first 2 measurements was used for the analysis; if the difference was ≥0.3 kg or ≥0.3 cm, the mean of all 3 measurements was used. In the intervention and control arms, over the 5 visits (i.e., 12 mo) weight of the children had 4.8% and 3.4% missing values, respectively. Missing values of height and MUAC were 4.6% and 5.8% in the intervention arm compared with 3.4% and 4.2% in the control arm, respectively. Missing values for overall frequency of food consumption were 20.8% in the intervention arm and 21.4% in the control arm, with similar percentages for specific food groups. The study was approved by the Committee on Human Research at the University of California San Francisco and the Ethical Review Committee at the Kenya Medical Research Institute. The study's purpose was explained to participants and written informed consent was obtained from each adult participant before conducting the survey. Intention-to-treat, repeated-measures analyses were done in Stata version 13 (StataCorp LP), with child as a random effect and arm, month of visit, and their interaction as fixed effects. Month of visit was continuous. All available data were analyzed assuming missingness at random. We estimated the difference between arms in the linear trends over months (i.e., fitting a straight line over months for each arm) using the interaction between arm and month. Because we hypothesized that children in the intervention arm would have a higher slope for the trend over visits in anthropometry and diet (except for condiments and tea/coffee, which would have a lower slope) than children in the control arm, we report 1-tailed P values. In sensitivity analyses for dietary intake without 22 children aged <6 mo, inferences were unchanged, with differences in the trends between arms being slightly larger; most of the 22 children consumed some complementary foods by visit 2.

Based on the provided information, the following innovations can be recommended to improve access to maternal health:

1. Multisectoral household interventions: Implementing interventions that address multiple sectors, such as agriculture and finance, can have a positive impact on maternal health. This can include providing resources and training in sustainable farming practices and financial management to improve access to nutritious food and income generation.

2. Livelihood interventions: Interventions that focus on improving livelihoods, such as providing small loans for purchasing farming implements or supporting income-generating activities, can help improve the nutrition and overall well-being of pregnant women and mothers.

3. Water and irrigation solutions: Access to clean water and irrigation facilities is crucial for successful agricultural practices. Implementing human-powered water pumps or other water and irrigation solutions can help improve agricultural productivity and ensure a stable food supply for pregnant women and mothers.

4. Training and education: Providing training and education on sustainable farming practices, financial management, and nutrition can empower pregnant women and mothers to make informed decisions regarding their health and the health of their children. This can include workshops, seminars, or community-based programs.

5. Microfinance institutions: Collaborating with microfinance institutions to provide small loans or financial services tailored to the specific needs of pregnant women and mothers can help improve access to resources and support income-generating activities.

6. Community-based initiatives: Engaging the community in initiatives that promote maternal health, such as community gardens or nutrition education programs, can create a supportive environment and encourage behavior change towards healthier practices.

It is important to note that these recommendations are based on the specific context and findings of the study mentioned. Further research and evaluation may be needed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of these innovations in different settings.
AI Innovations Description
The recommendation from the study is to implement a multisectoral household agricultural and finance intervention to improve access to maternal health. This intervention includes providing a human-powered water pump, microfinance loans for farm commodities, and training in sustainable farming practices and financial management. The study found that this intervention led to increased dietary intake and improved nutritional status of HIV-affected children in rural Kenya. By implementing similar interventions, it is possible to improve access to maternal health by addressing food insecurity and promoting sustainable farming practices.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided description, the study aimed to test whether a multisectoral household agricultural and finance intervention could increase dietary intake and improve the nutritional status of HIV-affected children in Western Kenya. The intervention included a human-powered water pump, microfinance loan for farm commodities, and training in sustainable farming practices and financial management.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could be developed as follows:

1. Define the objectives: Clearly state the specific objectives of the simulation, such as assessing the potential impact of the agricultural and finance intervention on maternal health outcomes.

2. Identify key variables: Identify the key variables that are relevant to maternal health, such as access to healthcare facilities, availability of maternal health services, utilization of antenatal care, skilled birth attendance, and maternal mortality rates.

3. Collect baseline data: Gather relevant data on the current status of maternal health in the target area, including baseline values of the identified key variables. This data can be obtained from existing sources such as health records, surveys, and government reports.

4. Develop a simulation model: Create a simulation model that incorporates the intervention components and their potential effects on the key variables. This model should consider factors such as the number of households reached by the intervention, the increase in agricultural productivity, the improvement in household income, and the subsequent impact on maternal health outcomes.

5. Validate the model: Validate the simulation model by comparing its outputs with real-world data or expert opinions. This step ensures that the model accurately represents the potential impact of the intervention on maternal health outcomes.

6. Run the simulation: Use the validated model to simulate the impact of the agricultural and finance intervention on maternal health outcomes. This involves inputting the relevant data and running the simulation to generate projected outcomes.

7. Analyze the results: Analyze the simulation results to assess the potential impact of the intervention on improving access to maternal health. This may involve comparing the projected outcomes with the baseline data and identifying any significant improvements or changes.

8. Interpret and communicate the findings: Interpret the simulation results and communicate the findings to relevant stakeholders, such as policymakers, healthcare providers, and community members. This step is crucial for informing decision-making and potential implementation of the intervention.

It is important to note that the methodology described above is a general framework and may need to be adapted based on the specific context and available data. Additionally, the accuracy of the simulation results depends on the quality and reliability of the input data and assumptions made in the model.

Partagez ceci :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email