Attendance at antenatal clinics in inner-city Johannesburg, South Africa and its associations with birth outcomes: Analysis of data from birth registers at three facilities

listen audio

Study Justification:
– Antenatal care (ANC) clinics are important for improving pregnancy outcomes, especially for HIV-infected women.
– This study aimed to identify variations in ANC attendance in inner-city Johannesburg and assess the impact of non-attendance on birth outcomes.
– By understanding the factors influencing ANC attendance, interventions can be developed to improve birth outcomes and HIV testing rates.
Study Highlights:
– The study found that ANC attendance in inner-city Johannesburg was lower than national levels, with only 88.7% of women attending ANC.
– Attendance was particularly concerning at the primary care clinic, which serves a predominantly migrant population.
– Adolescents had lower ANC attendance rates, possibly due to stigma when seeking care.
– Non-attenders were more likely to have preterm deliveries and stillbirths compared to those who attended ANC.
– Caesarean section rates were higher in women who attended ANC.
Study Recommendations:
– Interventions should be implemented to raise ANC attendance, especially among adolescents, to improve birth outcomes and HIV testing rates.
– Efforts should be made to reduce stigma associated with seeking care, particularly for adolescents.
– Strategies should be developed to improve access to ANC services in primary care clinics, particularly in areas with high migrant populations.
Key Role Players:
– Healthcare providers (nurses, midwives, doctors) at ANC clinics
– Community health workers
– Policy makers and government officials responsible for healthcare services
– NGOs and community-based organizations working in maternal and child health
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Training and capacity building for healthcare providers on ANC services and addressing stigma
– Outreach and awareness campaigns to promote ANC attendance
– Development and implementation of referral systems between primary, secondary, and tertiary care facilities
– Strengthening ANC services in primary care clinics, including infrastructure and staffing
– Monitoring and evaluation of interventions to assess their effectiveness
Please note that the cost items provided are general suggestions and may vary depending on the specific context and resources available.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong because it includes a large sample size (31,179 women) and uses multiple logistic regression to identify associations between ANC attendance and birth outcomes. The study also includes sensitivity analyses to test the effects of missing data on ANC attendance. However, there are some potential limitations to consider. The study only includes public health facilities in inner-city Johannesburg, which may not be representative of the entire population. Private sector hospitals were not included, which could introduce selection bias. Additionally, the study setting in inner-city Johannesburg has unique characteristics that may limit generalizability to other regions. To improve the evidence, future studies could include a more diverse sample of healthcare facilities and consider the impact of socioeconomic factors on ANC attendance and birth outcomes.

Background: Antenatal care (ANC) clinics serve as key gateways to screening and treatment interventions that improve pregnancy outcomes, and are especially important for HIV-infected women. By disaggregating data on access to ANC, we aimed to identify variation in ANC attendance by level of care and across vulnerable groups in inner-city Johannesburg, and document the impact of non-attendance on birth outcomes. Methods: This record review of routine health service data involved manual extraction of 2 years of data from birth registers at a primary-, secondary- and tertiary-level facility within inner-city Johannesburg. Information was gathered on ANC attendance, HIV testing and status, pregnancy duration, delivery mode and birth outcomes. Women with an unknown attendance status were considered as not having attended clinic, but effects of this assumption were tested in sensitivity analyses. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify associations between ANC attendance and birth outcomes. Results: Of 31,179 women who delivered, 88.7% (27,651) had attended ANC (95% CI = 88.3-89.0). Attendance was only 77% at primary care (5813/7543), compared to 89% at secondary (3661/4113) and 93% at tertiary level (18,177/19,523). Adolescents had lower ANC attendance than adults (85%, 1951/2295 versus 89%, 22,039/24,771). Only 37% of women not attending ANC had an HIV test (1308/3528), compared with 93% of ANC attenders (25,756/27,651). Caesarean section rates were considerably higher in women who had attended ANC (40%, 10,866/27,344) than non-attenders (13%, 422/3360). Compared to those who had attended ANC, non-attenders were 1.6 fold more likely to have a preterm delivery (95% CI adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.4-1.8) and 1.4 fold more likely to have a stillbirth (aOR 95% CI = 1.1-1.9). Similar results were seen in analyses where missing data on ANC attendance was classified in different ways. Conclusion: Inner-city Johannesburg has an almost 5% lower ANC attendance rate than national levels. Attendance is particularly concerning in the primary care clinic that serves a predominantly migrant population. Adolescents had especially low rates, perhaps owing to stigma when seeking care. Interventions to raise ANC attendance, especially among adolescents, may help improve birth outcomes and HIV testing rates, bringing the country closer to achieving maternal and child health targets and eliminating HIV in children.

The study included the public health facilities where all public-sector births within the inner-city, region F of Johannesburg take place. Specifically, these were: Hillbrow Community Health Centre (HCHC, a primary health clinic), South Rand Hospital (SRH, a secondary-level district hospital and Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH, a tertiary-level facility). Private sector hospitals were not included as we believed that it would be difficult to access data from patients at those facilities and they make up a relatively small proportion of all deliveries in the region. We manually extracted data from labour ward registers of all births in 2008 and 2009 at HCHC and SRH. Data were also extracted from birth registers at CMJAH for the years 2011 and 2012. All births are captured in these registers, as well as information on deliveries that occur before the mother and infant arrive at the facility. The registers collate pregnancy, intrapartum and birth outcomes data, and are a rich source of information. A protocol describing the care processes in the region states at which level of care the different patient groups are to receive treatment. In HCHC, nurses and midwives provide care for women with uncomplicated pregnancies. SRH, the secondary level of care is managed by midwives and medical officers who treat women with minor medical complications. At CMJAH all women are assessed by a doctor and there are medical specialists available for more complicated patients. Women are considered to have a complicated pregnancy if they were unwell in a previous pregnancy, or have, for example, co-morbid medical illnesses, multiple gestations or suspected congenital abnormalities. In HCHC and SRH, women do not require a referral letter and can present directly for services when pregnant. CMJAH only provides ANC for women with pregnancy complications and then refers healthy women to lower levels of care. Caesarean sections are only performed at the secondary- and tertiary-level facilities. There are no user fees for HIV, ANC or childbirth services. HIV testing, PMTCT and antiretroviral treatment are available at all facilities. It is important to note that the study setting, region F (inner-city), has several distinctive features which influence the uptake of health services and programme implementation. The inner-city is one of seven regions within the district called City of Johannesburg. In turn, the City of Johannesburg is one of five districts of the Gauteng Province, the economic hub of the country. The inner-city is densely populated, consisting of the flatland areas of Hillbrow and Berea, as well as the Johannesburg Central Business District. It is estimated that the region contains about 15% of the 4 million people who live in the city of Johannesburg [21]. However, it is likely that this figure is well above 15% as the majority of the large transient population in the inner-city area are not included in those estimates. The inner-city is a uniquely complex and dynamic environment that has undergone major demographic, social and economic shifts over the last few decades. Many of its inhabitants are immigrants, both South Africans from other provinces of the country as well as foreigners. About a quarter of adults in the area are unemployed [21]. The inner-city houses several large taxi hubs and 800,000 commuters are said to pass through the city daily. Informal trading is the dominant economic activity. Unfortunately, the area is plagued with high levels of crime and drug dealing [22]. Not surprisingly, the area has a high burden of HIV: the antenatal HIV prevalence in Gauteng Province as a whole was 29.9% in the most recent national survey (2012), with a similar level in the City of Johannesburg (29.6%). Corresponding figures for Herpes Simplex Virus type-2 were 58.4% and 58.5% [23]. The following variables were manually extracted from the labour ward registers into a Microsoft Excel database: ANC attendance (having attended at least one ANC visit), maternal age (not available at SRH), gravidity and parity (only available at CMJAH), HIV testing uptake and status, mode of delivery, infant gender, gestation at childbirth and stillbirths. Patient names or other identifiers were not collected. Adolescents were divided into younger and older groups (10–16 years and 17–19 years), which correspond broadly to the ages of those in primary or secondary school (10–16 years), and those in the final years of school or post-school (17–19 years). Adults were groups into 5-year age bands. As about 4% of data were missing on whether women had attended ANC, we performed a sensitivity analysis in which we reclassified the missing data in one of three ways. Firstly, in a worst case scenario, women whose attendance status was unknown were classified as not having attended ANC. In the second scenario, a ‘missing excluded’ analysis, we excluded all women where it was unknown whether or not they had attended ANC. The third scenario, the best case, classifies women with unknown attendance as having attended ANC. Findings across the three scenarios were compared for effect size and direction. The associations reported in the paper are drawn primarily from the worst case scenario, as we considered it most likely that where attendance was unknown, patients had not actually attended care. Also, many of the figures in the other two scenarios were implausible. Figures for HCHC were unchanged across the scenarios as data were not missing on ANC attendance at that site. Newborns were classified as preterm (under 37 weeks gestation), term (37 to 41 weeks) and post-term (42 or more weeks). Stillbirths included some deaths that occurred shortly after birth as the birth records did not differentiate between those deaths and actual stillbirths. Data were recoded and analysed using STATA version 12 (STATA Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA). Chi-square tests were used to detect associations between categorical variables and Wilcoxon Rank sum tests were used for analysis of continuous variables. Pearson Chi-square test for trend assessed associations between ordinal exposure categories and binary outcomes. Multiple logistic regression models examined whether ANC attendance was associated with two dependent variables assessing service access (HIV testing and Caesarean section delivery) and two birth outcomes (preterm births and stillbirth). These models included the variable site, and other potential confounding variables associated with the outcome in univariate analysis or in analysis stratified by site (P < 0.10). The exposure variable antenatal attendance was included in the multivariate model assessing factors associated with the outcome preterm delivery (attendance was associated with preterm delivery in all three facilities, even though not associated with the outcome when data from all sites were pooled). For similar reasons, the exposure variable delivery mode was included in the multivariate model assessing factors associated with the outcome stillbirths. Potential confounders varied by outcome variable, with, for example, infant sex not included in the outcome HIV testing, as there was no plausible causal pathway between these variables. Infant sex, however, and HIV status were considered potential confounders for the remaining three models.

Based on the provided information, here are some potential innovations that could improve access to maternal health:

1. Mobile clinics: Implementing mobile clinics that can travel to different areas within inner-city Johannesburg, especially areas with limited access to healthcare facilities. This would make it easier for pregnant women to receive antenatal care without having to travel long distances.

2. Community health workers: Training and deploying community health workers who can provide basic antenatal care services and education to pregnant women in their communities. These workers can also help identify and refer high-risk pregnancies to higher-level healthcare facilities.

3. Telemedicine: Introducing telemedicine services that allow pregnant women to consult with healthcare providers remotely. This would be particularly beneficial for women who face barriers to accessing healthcare, such as transportation issues or stigma.

4. Health education campaigns: Launching targeted health education campaigns to raise awareness about the importance of antenatal care and address any misconceptions or cultural barriers that may prevent women from seeking care. These campaigns can be tailored to specific vulnerable groups, such as adolescents or migrant populations.

5. Integration of services: Integrating maternal health services with other existing healthcare services, such as HIV testing and treatment, to ensure comprehensive care for pregnant women. This can help improve HIV testing rates and overall health outcomes for both mothers and infants.

6. Improved referral systems: Strengthening referral systems between primary, secondary, and tertiary healthcare facilities to ensure seamless care for pregnant women. This would involve clear communication channels and standardized protocols for transferring patients between different levels of care.

7. Financial incentives: Introducing financial incentives, such as transportation vouchers or cash transfers, to encourage pregnant women to attend antenatal care appointments. This can help offset the costs associated with accessing healthcare and improve attendance rates.

8. Quality improvement initiatives: Implementing quality improvement initiatives at healthcare facilities to enhance the overall experience of pregnant women seeking care. This can include measures such as reducing waiting times, improving staff attitudes and communication, and ensuring the availability of essential supplies and equipment.

It is important to note that these recommendations are based on the specific context of inner-city Johannesburg and may need to be adapted to suit the local circumstances and resources available.
AI Innovations Description
The study mentioned in the description focuses on the attendance at antenatal clinics in inner-city Johannesburg, South Africa, and its associations with birth outcomes. The study found that there is variation in ANC attendance by level of care and across vulnerable groups in inner-city Johannesburg. The study also found that non-attendance at ANC is associated with negative birth outcomes, such as preterm delivery and stillbirth.

Based on the findings of this study, a recommendation to improve access to maternal health would be to implement interventions aimed at increasing ANC attendance, especially among vulnerable groups such as adolescents. These interventions could include:

1. Increasing awareness: Implementing community-based awareness campaigns to educate pregnant women and their families about the importance of ANC and the benefits it provides for both the mother and the baby. This could involve using various communication channels, such as radio, television, and community meetings, to reach a wide audience.

2. Addressing stigma: Addressing the stigma associated with seeking ANC, particularly among adolescents, by providing counseling services and creating safe spaces where pregnant women can feel comfortable accessing healthcare services without fear of judgment or discrimination.

3. Improving accessibility: Ensuring that ANC services are easily accessible to all pregnant women, including those living in remote or underserved areas. This could involve establishing mobile clinics or outreach programs to bring ANC services closer to communities that may have limited access to healthcare facilities.

4. Strengthening healthcare infrastructure: Investing in the improvement of healthcare facilities, particularly at the primary care level, to ensure that they have the necessary resources and capacity to provide quality ANC services. This could include training healthcare providers, improving equipment and supplies, and enhancing the overall quality of care.

5. Integrating services: Integrating ANC services with other maternal and child health services, such as HIV testing and treatment, to provide comprehensive care for pregnant women. This could involve co-locating services or implementing referral systems to ensure that pregnant women receive all the necessary interventions in a coordinated manner.

By implementing these recommendations, it is expected that ANC attendance rates will increase, leading to improved birth outcomes and better overall maternal and child health in the inner-city Johannesburg region.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided study, here are some potential recommendations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Strengthen primary healthcare services: The study found that attendance at antenatal clinics was lower at the primary care level compared to secondary and tertiary levels. To improve access, it is important to invest in and strengthen primary healthcare services, particularly in areas with vulnerable populations.

2. Targeted interventions for adolescents: The study also highlighted lower attendance rates among adolescents. Implementing targeted interventions, such as adolescent-friendly clinics and educational programs, can help improve access to maternal health services for this age group.

3. Address stigma and barriers to care: The study suggested that stigma may be a barrier to accessing antenatal care, especially for certain populations. Efforts should be made to address stigma and other barriers to care, such as transportation issues or lack of awareness about available services.

4. Improve HIV testing rates: The study found that women who did not attend antenatal care had lower rates of HIV testing. To improve access to maternal health, it is crucial to ensure that HIV testing is readily available and promoted during antenatal care visits.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could be developed as follows:

1. Define indicators: Identify key indicators that measure access to maternal health, such as ANC attendance rates, HIV testing rates, and birth outcomes (e.g., preterm births, stillbirths).

2. Collect baseline data: Gather data on the current status of these indicators in the target population or region. This could involve reviewing existing data sources, conducting surveys, or analyzing health facility records.

3. Develop a simulation model: Create a simulation model that incorporates the identified recommendations and their potential impact on the selected indicators. The model should consider factors such as population demographics, healthcare infrastructure, and resource availability.

4. Input data and parameters: Input the baseline data and parameters into the simulation model. This may include information on population size, age distribution, healthcare facility capacity, and the expected effects of the recommendations on the selected indicators.

5. Run simulations: Run the simulation model multiple times, adjusting the parameters to reflect different scenarios and assumptions. This could involve varying the implementation of the recommendations, considering different levels of resource allocation, or simulating the impact over different time periods.

6. Analyze results: Analyze the simulation results to assess the potential impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This could involve comparing the simulated outcomes with the baseline data and identifying any significant changes or improvements.

7. Validate and refine the model: Validate the simulation model by comparing the simulated results with real-world data, if available. Refine the model based on feedback and further analysis to ensure its accuracy and reliability.

8. Communicate findings: Present the findings of the simulation study in a clear and concise manner, highlighting the potential impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This information can be used to inform decision-making and guide the implementation of interventions in real-world settings.

Partagez ceci :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email