Factors associated with health facility childbirth in districts of Kenya, Tanzania and Zambia: A population based survey

listen audio

Study Justification:
The study aimed to investigate the factors associated with health facility childbirth in rural and urban areas of three districts in Kenya, Tanzania, and Zambia. This is important because maternal mortality continues to be a burden in low and middle-income countries, where many deliveries occur at home without skilled attendance. Understanding the determinants of health facility childbirth can help identify strategies to improve maternal health outcomes.
Highlights:
1. The study found substantial differences in the proportion of health facility childbirth between districts and between rural and urban areas.
2. Socio-economic inequities were revealed, indicating a need to strengthen services targeting disadvantaged and remote populations.
3. The study found a positive association between HIV counseling/testing and health facility childbirth, suggesting the potential benefits of integrated approaches in maternal health service delivery.
Recommendations:
1. Strengthen services targeting disadvantaged and remote populations to address socio-economic inequities in health facility childbirth.
2. Enhance integrated approaches in maternal health service delivery, particularly in relation to HIV counseling/testing.
3. Improve access to health facilities in rural areas by addressing perceived distance as a barrier to health facility childbirth.
Key Role Players:
1. Government health departments in Kenya, Tanzania, and Zambia
2. Non-governmental organizations working in maternal health
3. Health facility administrators and staff
4. Community health workers and volunteers
5. Women’s advocacy groups
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
1. Training and capacity building for health facility staff and community health workers
2. Infrastructure development to improve access to health facilities in rural areas
3. Outreach programs to reach disadvantaged and remote populations
4. Information, education, and communication campaigns to raise awareness about the benefits of health facility childbirth
5. Monitoring and evaluation activities to assess the impact of interventions and ensure accountability

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong because it is based on a population-based survey conducted in three districts in Kenya, Tanzania, and Zambia. The survey included a large sample size of 1800 women who had given birth in the previous five years. The study analyzed various factors that might influence health care seeking behavior and place of delivery. The findings reveal substantial inter-district differences in the proportion of health facility childbirth and socio-economic inequities in all districts. The study also suggests the need to strengthen services targeting disadvantaged and remote populations. To improve the evidence, it would be helpful to provide more details on the methodology used in the survey, such as the sampling technique and data collection process.

Background: Maternal mortality continues to be a heavy burden in low and middle income countries where half of all deliveries take place in homes without skilled attendance. The study aimed to investigate the underlying and proximate determinants of health facility childbirth in rural and urban areas of three districts in Kenya, Tanzania and Zambia.Methods: A population-based survey was conducted in 2007 as part of the ‘REsponse to ACcountable priority setting for Trust in health systems’ (REACT) project. Stratified random cluster sampling was used and the data included information on place of delivery and factors that might influence health care seeking behaviour. A total of 1800 women who had childbirth in the previous five years were analysed. The distal and proximate conceptual framework for analysing determinants of maternal mortality was modified for studying factors associated with place of delivery. Socioeconomic position was measured by employing a construct of educational attainment and wealth index. All analyses were stratified by district and urban-rural residence.Results: There were substantial inter-district differences in proportion of health facility childbirth. Facility childbirth was 15, 70 and 37% in the rural areas of Malindi, Mbarali and Kapiri Mposhi respectively, and 57, 75 and 77% in the urban areas of the districts respectively. However, striking socio-economic inequities were revealed regardless of district. Furthermore, there were indications that repeated exposure to ANC services and HIV related counselling and testing were positively associated with health facility deliveries. Perceived distance was negatively associated with facility childbirth in rural areas of Malindi and urban areas of Kapiri Mposhi.Conclusion: Strong socio-economic inequities in the likelihood of facility childbirths were revealed in all the districts added to geographic inequities in two of the three districts. This strongly suggests an urgent need to strengthen services targeting disadvantaged and remote populations. The finding of a positive association between HIV counselling/testing and odds in favor of giving birth at a health facility suggests potential positive effects can be achieved by strengthening integrated approaches in maternal health service delivery. © 2014 Ng’anjo Phiri et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

The survey was conducted in 2007. Selected sites were Malindi in Kenya, Mbarali in Tanzania, and Kapiri Mposhi in Zambia. The sites were selected based on the assumption of their similarities in disease burden and health systems [29], although, the organization of the healthcare system in the three districts appears to differ substantially [30]. The estimated population in the study areas was 350,000 in Malindi, 235,000 in Mbarali and 200,000 in Kapiri Mposhi [31-33]. Malindi is located in the Coast Province along the Kenyan border with the Indian Ocean. It is a major tourist destination, and its main economic activities include fishing, forestry, tourism, and agriculture. Malindi has a crude birth rate of 48 per 1,000, growth rate of 3.9%, and total fertility rate (TFR) of 6.1, with contraceptive acceptance rate of 29% [31]. It has three hospitals (one government and two private) and 24 dispensaries (17 government and seven non-governmental organizations) [31]. Mbarali is situated in the Mbeya region of Tanzania. It is along the major road connecting Mbeya city with Dar es Salaam, and a railway line that joins Kapiri Mposhi in Zambia to Dar es Salaam. The main economic activity is agriculture. The district’s growth rate is 2.8%, and the TFR for the southern region is 4.4 [27]. Mbarali has two hospitals in Chimala and Rujewa, two health centres and 39 dispensaries. Most of the health facilities are supported by health insurance services from government, National Health Insurance Fund [34]. In contrast and similarities, Kapiri Mposhi is in the Central Province and a gateway to the north of the country via road and railway connections. The main economic activity is agriculture. The TFR for Central Province is 6.4 [28]. The crude birth rate is 43 per 1,000 and a growth rate of 2.7% [33]. Kapiri Mposhi has 25 public health centres, two health posts, one private and two mission health centres [35]. A second level referral hospital located about 50 kilometres south of the district in Kabwe, served referrals from Kapiri Mposhi until 2011 when a new hospital was opened within the district. The data stem from a population-based survey employing multi-stage stratified random cluster design. Stratification was by district and within district by rural–urban residence. Rural and urban were defined according to population censuses of 1999, 2002 and 2000 in Kenya, Tanzania and Zambia, respectively [36]. A combination of politico-administrative perspective and human settlements perspective were used with Kenya defining urban as municipalities with 2,000 inhabitants or more; whereas Tanzania defined this by size and density with majority of their inhabitants in non-agricultural occupations; and Zambia defining urban as localities of 5,000 inhabitants or more and a majority of the labour force in non-agricultural activities [36]. Proportions of urban population were 21, 23 and 35% for Kenya, Tanzania and Zambia respectively [26-28]. Standard enumeration areas (SEAs) were used as basic sampling units. First, clusters that corresponded with the SEAs at the district were selected using probability proportional to size. The listing of SEAs provided information on households based on the population census. A total of 49 clusters (Malindi 10, Mbarali 19, Kapiri Mposhi 20) were selected from the urban stratum, and 70 clusters (Malindi 19, Mbarali 26, Kapiri Mposhi 25) from the rural stratum. The second stage involved randomly selecting a fixed number of households from the list that was compiled consisting of all households in the selected SEAs in each district. The aim was to select 2,000 individuals in each district. One male and one female aged between 15 and 49 years of age were randomly selected as participants in each household. This study analysed women respondents who had delivered within five years prior to the study and information obtained about the most recent childbirth. A conceptual framework by McCarthy and Maine [37] was employed to guide analysis. The framework guides analysis of maternal mortality determinants and could be applied to research and programmes [37]. The concept grouped determinants as distant factors that are underlying socio-economic and cultural factors; intermediate or proximate factors, such as healthcare seeking behaviour and use of health services, health status, and access to services, which directly influence pregnancy outcomes of morbidity and mortality. The distal socio-economic and cultural factors are mediated through the health seeking behaviour and access to health care service to result in pregnancy outcome [37]. Considering evidence from studies that relate EmONC services to reduced maternal mortality [38], we found this framework applicable to our study on use of health facilities for childbirth, with the presumption that facilities provide skilled birth attendance and EmONC services. Selection of variables to include in our model was guided by previous studies and the above framework. It was hypothesized that underlying socioeconomic position, age and marital status were associated with health facility childbirth. Women’s educational attainment and wealth status have been associated with health facility childbirth in sub-Saharan Africa and other regions [12-14,39,40]. Single women seem to have more autonomy than married women, and conversely young women may not have the financial capability to access health services [41]. In sub-Saharan Africa, older age has been associated with reduced health facility childbirth [16,42]. It was hypothesized that proximate factors of access to health services measured by perceived distance and perceived cost were associated with reduced health facility childbirth, as observed in previous studies [16-18,43]. We also hypothesized that trust and perceived quality of care, use of health care services during ANC visits and exposure to HIV counselling and testing were associated with increased health facility childbirth. Perceived quality of care has been associated with by-pass of the nearest health facility, and ANC visits with increased use of health facility at delivery [16,18,44-46]. Data was collected in 2007 by trained enumerators using a structured questionnaire. The data collection tools were developed and standardised for application in the three countries within a standard operating procedure for training of staff, and pilot testing of the tools. EpiData version 3.1 was used for data entry. The dependent variable was place of childbirth dichotomised as: home delivery = 0, all health facility deliveries = 1. Only women having given birth the previous five years or less were included in the analysis. Independent underlying variables included socioeconomic position (SEP), age and marital status categorised as single (never married, widowed, separated and divorced), and married (married, cohabitating). SEP was created by summation of wealth index and the woman’s educational attainment in school years. Wealth index was a summation of information on electricity; asset ownership of radio, television, refrigerator, bicycle, plough, donkey, cattle; and type of housing construction material. SEP is seen as a multidimensional and multilevel construct which is partly determined by structural relations. We used educational attainment and wealth index as indicators of SEP with the intention to capture the association between facility childbirth and SEP as part of the assessment for equity. SEP was categorised as low, middle and high to indicate proportions of facility childbirths but retained as a continuous variable in the model. Educational attainment and wealth index were also analysed as separate variables in the model to compare with the model using SEP variable. However, only educational attainment remained as a significant factor. Since the two indicators were highly correlated (r = 0.2), we used the composite variable in analysis. Proximate variables included a composite “trust-quality”, which was created using self-rating of local health services, perceived drug availability and perceived attitudes of the health care staff at the nearest clinic. These three variables were correlated and principal component analysis was used for data reduction. The trust-quality variable was categorized into four groups ranging from ‘very bad’ to ‘very good’ and later condensed the adjacent groups to create two categories, ‘bad’ and ‘good’. The non-categorized variable was retained and used as a continuous variable in the model. Other proximate variables were perceived cost and perceived distance which were categorized using a Likert scale ranging from “not at all” to “very much” and later condensed as “not at all/little”, “fairly” and “much/very much” while maintaining the uncondensed variable as a continuous quantity in the model. The number of ANC attendance and ever tested for HIV (yes, no) were used as proxies to use of health services during pregnancy. ANC attendance was grouped as 0–3 visits, 4 or more visits, and was used as continuous in the model. Data analysis was done using SPSS for Windows Version 19, SPSS Inc. Chicago, Illinois. Descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis were done and complex sample design used to take into consideration the design effect. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted associations. In step1 only the underlying (or distal) factors were included in the model, whereas in step 2 the proximate factors were also included. The variables selected in the model were those that were found significant in bivariate analysis in any of the three districts. Analyses were stratified by district and by rural–urban residence. Ethical clearance was obtained in Kenya from Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) and from the National Ethical Review Committee (NERC); in Tanzania from the Medical Research Coordinating Committee (MRCC) of the National Institute of Medical Research (NIMR); and in Zambia the University of Zambia Research Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants of the population based surveys prior to being interviewed. Confidentiality and anonymity of the study participants was maintained. This study was specifically approved by the Steering Committee of REACT, which is also the project review board including representatives from all three study countries.

Based on the information provided, here are some potential innovations that could improve access to maternal health:

1. Mobile health clinics: Implementing mobile health clinics that can travel to rural and remote areas, providing essential maternal health services to women who may not have easy access to healthcare facilities.

2. Telemedicine: Utilizing telemedicine technology to connect pregnant women in remote areas with healthcare professionals who can provide prenatal care and guidance remotely.

3. Community health workers: Training and deploying community health workers who can provide basic prenatal care, education, and support to pregnant women in their communities.

4. Financial incentives: Implementing financial incentives, such as cash transfers or vouchers, to encourage pregnant women to seek care at healthcare facilities for childbirth.

5. Improving transportation: Investing in transportation infrastructure to ensure that pregnant women have reliable and affordable transportation options to reach healthcare facilities for prenatal care and childbirth.

6. Strengthening healthcare facilities: Investing in the infrastructure, equipment, and staffing of healthcare facilities in rural and remote areas to ensure that they can provide quality maternal health services.

7. Education and awareness campaigns: Conducting education and awareness campaigns to inform pregnant women and their families about the importance of seeking care at healthcare facilities for prenatal care and childbirth.

8. Integration of services: Integrating maternal health services with other healthcare services, such as HIV testing and counseling, to provide comprehensive care to pregnant women.

9. Empowering women: Promoting women’s empowerment and autonomy in decision-making regarding their reproductive health, including access to maternal health services.

10. Partnerships and collaborations: Encouraging partnerships and collaborations between governments, non-governmental organizations, and private sector entities to leverage resources and expertise to improve access to maternal health services.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the information provided, the recommendation to improve access to maternal health is to strengthen services targeting disadvantaged and remote populations. The study revealed strong socio-economic inequities in the likelihood of facility childbirths in all three districts, as well as geographic inequities in two of the districts. This suggests an urgent need to address these inequities and ensure that all women, regardless of their socio-economic status or location, have access to quality maternal health services. Additionally, the study found a positive association between HIV counseling/testing and the likelihood of giving birth at a health facility. This suggests that integrating HIV services with maternal health services can have positive effects on facility childbirth rates. Therefore, it is recommended to strengthen integrated approaches in maternal health service delivery to further improve access to maternal health.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided description, here are some potential recommendations for improving access to maternal health:

1. Strengthen services targeting disadvantaged and remote populations: The study revealed strong socio-economic inequities in the likelihood of facility childbirths, as well as geographic inequities in certain districts. To address this, it is recommended to focus on strengthening healthcare services in areas with limited access, such as rural and remote regions. This could involve increasing the number of healthcare facilities, improving transportation infrastructure, and providing financial support for disadvantaged populations to access maternal health services.

2. Strengthen integrated approaches in maternal health service delivery: The study found a positive association between HIV counseling/testing and the likelihood of giving birth at a health facility. This suggests that integrating maternal health services with HIV services can have a positive impact on improving access to maternal health. It is recommended to further strengthen and expand integrated approaches, such as providing comprehensive antenatal care services that include HIV counseling/testing, to encourage more women to seek care at health facilities.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could be developed as follows:

1. Define the indicators: Identify key indicators that measure access to maternal health, such as the proportion of facility childbirths, distance to the nearest healthcare facility, and utilization of antenatal care services.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather data on the selected indicators before implementing the recommendations. This could involve conducting surveys, interviews, or analyzing existing data sources.

3. Implement the recommendations: Put the recommendations into action, such as strengthening services in disadvantaged areas and integrating maternal health services with HIV services.

4. Monitor and collect data: Continuously monitor the implementation of the recommendations and collect data on the selected indicators. This could involve conducting follow-up surveys or analyzing existing data sources.

5. Analyze the data: Use statistical analysis techniques to analyze the collected data and assess the impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This could involve comparing the baseline data with the post-implementation data to identify any changes or improvements.

6. Evaluate the impact: Assess the impact of the recommendations based on the analysis of the data. This could involve calculating the percentage change in the selected indicators, identifying any significant differences between pre and post-implementation data, and evaluating the overall effectiveness of the recommendations.

By following this methodology, it would be possible to simulate the impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health and assess their effectiveness in addressing the identified issues.

Partagez ceci :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email