Individual- and Neighborhood-Level Factors of Measles Vaccination Coverage in Niamey, Niger: A Multilevel Analysis

listen audio

Study Justification:
This study aimed to identify individual- and neighborhood-level factors that could improve measles vaccination coverage in Niamey, Niger. Vaccination is an effective intervention, but the coverage rate in Niger was only 76% in 2016. Understanding the factors that influence vaccination can help develop targeted strategies to improve coverage and ensure equitable access to vaccines.
Highlights:
– The study surveyed 460 mothers with children aged 12-23 months in Niamey.
– Individual-level factors associated with higher measles vaccination coverage included mother’s education level (primary and secondary education) and discussing vaccination with friends.
– No neighborhood-level factors were identified as significant predictors of vaccination coverage.
– The study recommends focusing on equity-based, individual factors to improve vaccination coverage, including motivation, prompts, and access to vaccination services.
Recommendations for Lay Reader and Policy Maker:
– Strengthen efforts to improve individual-level factors that influence vaccination, such as education and social support.
– Implement strategies to motivate and encourage parents to vaccinate their children, including awareness campaigns and community engagement.
– Improve access to vaccination services by ensuring convenient locations, reducing travel time, and addressing barriers such as cost and transportation.
– Enhance communication and information-sharing about the importance and benefits of vaccination among parents, healthcare providers, and community leaders.
Key Role Players:
– Ministry of Health: Responsible for overall coordination and implementation of vaccination programs.
– Healthcare Providers: Involved in delivering vaccines and providing information to parents.
– Community Leaders: Play a crucial role in promoting vaccination and addressing community concerns.
– Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs): Can support vaccination campaigns, community outreach, and education initiatives.
– Local Government: Responsible for infrastructure and logistics support, including transportation and healthcare facilities.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Awareness Campaigns: Budget for designing and disseminating information materials, organizing community events, and media outreach.
– Training and Capacity Building: Allocate funds for training healthcare providers on vaccination protocols, communication skills, and addressing vaccine hesitancy.
– Infrastructure and Logistics: Consider costs for improving healthcare facilities, ensuring reliable electricity supply, and optimizing access to vaccination services.
– Monitoring and Evaluation: Set aside resources for data collection, analysis, and monitoring the impact of interventions on vaccination coverage.
– Community Engagement: Allocate funds for community mobilization activities, including incentives for community leaders and volunteers.
Note: The provided cost items are general categories and should be further refined based on local context and specific needs.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is moderately strong, but there are areas for improvement. The study conducted a multilevel analysis to identify individual- and neighborhood-level factors that could improve measles 1 vaccination coverage in Niamey, Niger. The sample size of 460 mothers with children aged 12–23 months provides a decent amount of data. The study found that primary and secondary-educated mothers were more likely to vaccinate their children against measles 1. However, no neighborhood-level factors were identified. To improve the strength of the evidence, future studies could consider increasing the sample size and including a wider range of neighborhood-level factors. Additionally, conducting qualitative research to explore the reasons behind individual-level factors and their impact on vaccination coverage could provide valuable insights.

Vaccination is a proven equitable intervention if people take advantage of the opportunity to get vaccinated. Niger is a low-income country in West Africa, with a 76% measles 1 vaccination coverage rate in 2016. This study was conducted to identify individual- and neighborhood-level factors that could improve measles 1 vaccination coverage in Niamey, the capital. In October 2016, 460 mothers with children aged 12–23 months were surveyed. The outcome was to determine whether the mother’s child had been vaccinated against measles 1 or not. For individual-level variables of measles 1 vaccination status, the following were included: mother’s age group, mother tongue, maternal education level, husband’s job, where the mother gave birth (at home or at a health center) and whether the mother discussed vaccination with friends. Neighborhood-level factors were access time to the health center, household access to electricity, and a grand-mean-centered wealth score. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed. At the individual-level, primary and secondary-educated mothers were more likely to vaccinate their children against measles 1 (aOR 1.97, 95% CI 1.11–3.51). At the neighborhood-level, no factors were identified. Therefore, a strengthened focus on equity-based, individual factors is recommended, including individual motivation, prompts and ability to access vaccination services.

Niger is a landlocked desert country in West Africa, with an estimated population of 16 million people in 2015 [28]. The capital Niamey’s population is estimated to be just over one million. The average annual population growth rate was 4.0% per year from 2010 to 2015, whereas the average annual urban population growth rate was 5.1% per year from 2010 to 2015 [29]. The five health districts in Niamey have population densities ranging from 824 to 4845 people/km2 [28]. The districts are further divided into neighborhoods, which are considered as community-level administrative units in this study. A recent map of land use and the distribution of concrete buildings and steel-sheet roofs demonstrates Niamey’s spatial expansion [30]. According to the 2012 DHS, nearly twenty-five percent of households in Niamey had an indoor water faucet; one-fourth of households had a water faucet within the concession, while approximately half of the households had to use a public water tap. A third of the surveyed households had an indoor improved toilet, half shared toilets with other families, and six percent had no access to sanitation facilities. The average household size in Niamey was 5.8 persons, while 17% of households had more than 9 persons. A quarter of the households had only one room, whereas forty-five percent of households had two rooms [31]. The overall study design, sample size calculation, study participants, data sources, and study management are detailed in the work of Kondo Kunieda et al. [6]. In brief, a cross-sectional household survey was conducted in the capital of Niger, Niamey. Data on the full vaccination coverage and socioeconomic household characteristics of 460 children aged 12–23 months were collected. Of 445 children, 38% were fully vaccinated. Mothers who were satisfied with their health workers’ attitude and had correct vaccination calendar knowledge were more likely to have fully vaccinated children. Mothers who had completed secondary school were also associated with having fully vaccinated their children. For the outcome of this study, measles 1 vaccination status was determined by the dates recorded in the MCH handbook. However, when a mother was unable to show her child’s MCH handbook, she was asked questions on household characteristics, knowledge, attitude, and actions related to child vaccination. When a mother showed her child’s MCH handbook, the surveyors copied all the dates of vaccination onto the survey questionnaire, photographed the page, and asked the mother the same questions as described above. All the data were entered and cleaned with Microsoft Excel and then exported to MLwiN 2.26 (Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK) for preliminary statistical analyses. The final analyses presented in this paper were performed using Stata 16.1 for Windows (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas, USA). Analytical results were then visualized using QGIS Desktop 2.18.13 software. For individual-level variables of measles 1 vaccination status, the following were included: mother’s age group, mother tongue, maternal education level, husband’s job, where the mother gave birth (at home or at a health center) and whether the mother discussed vaccination with friends [13,19]. Neighborhood-level variables included a categorical variable for access time to the health center [5,32], a binary variable for household access to electricity [33], and a grand mean-centered wealth score [33]. Multilevel modeling was employed to assess the relevance of individual- and neighborhood-level factors in predicting measles 1 vaccination status [33,34]. Multilevel modeling also deconstructed the variance attributed to mothers or neighborhoods. The following five models were fitted: model 0 was a null model with no exposure variable, model 1 contained only individual-level variables, and model 2 contained only neighborhood-level variables. Model 3 was a multilevel model that contained all the individual- and neighborhood-level variables. The two-level regression model 3 is as follows: In this two-level regression model, Covij is the vaccination coverage or status of the mother i’s child in the neighborhood j. υ0j,υ30j are variances in measles vaccination status for variable x0, x30 in the neighborhood j. u0j,u30j are random effects at the neighborhood level. ε0j, ε30j are the random effects at the mother level. εij, ε30j represent the differentials in measles vaccination status for variables x0, x30 for mother i in district j. When the individual-level variables are mean-centered, between-mother effects, regardless of neighborhood, are detected for wealth scores.

Based on the information provided, here are some potential innovations that could improve access to maternal health:

1. Mobile Health (mHealth) Solutions: Develop mobile applications or SMS-based systems that provide information and reminders about maternal health services, including vaccination schedules and locations of nearby health centers.

2. Community Health Workers: Train and deploy community health workers who can provide education and support to mothers in their neighborhoods, including information on the importance of vaccinations and where to access them.

3. Telemedicine: Implement telemedicine services to enable remote consultations between healthcare providers and pregnant women or new mothers, reducing the need for travel and increasing access to healthcare advice and support.

4. Transportation Solutions: Improve transportation infrastructure and services to ensure that pregnant women have reliable and affordable means of reaching healthcare facilities for prenatal care, vaccinations, and other maternal health services.

5. Financial Incentives: Introduce financial incentives or subsidies to encourage pregnant women to seek and complete maternal health services, including vaccinations. This could help address financial barriers that may prevent some women from accessing care.

6. Maternal Health Education Programs: Develop and implement comprehensive maternal health education programs that target both individuals and communities, raising awareness about the importance of vaccinations and other maternal health services.

7. Public-Private Partnerships: Foster collaborations between public and private sectors to improve access to maternal health services. This could involve leveraging private sector resources and expertise to expand healthcare infrastructure and service delivery in underserved areas.

8. Telehealth Clinics: Establish telehealth clinics in remote or underserved areas, allowing pregnant women to consult with healthcare providers remotely and receive necessary vaccinations and other maternal health services without having to travel long distances.

9. Maternal Health Hotlines: Set up dedicated hotlines staffed by trained healthcare professionals who can provide information, support, and guidance to pregnant women and new mothers, including information on vaccinations and where to access them.

10. Data-Driven Approaches: Utilize data analytics and predictive modeling to identify areas with low vaccination coverage and develop targeted interventions to improve access and uptake of maternal health services, including vaccinations.

These innovations aim to address various barriers to accessing maternal health services, including geographical, financial, informational, and cultural barriers. By implementing these innovations, it is hoped that access to maternal health, including vaccinations, can be improved, leading to better health outcomes for both mothers and their children.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the study conducted in Niamey, Niger, the recommendation to improve access to maternal health is to focus on equity-based, individual factors. This includes individual motivation, prompts, and the ability to access vaccination services. The study found that mothers who had completed primary and secondary education were more likely to vaccinate their children against measles. Therefore, promoting education among mothers can be an effective strategy to improve vaccination coverage. Additionally, providing information and support to mothers, such as discussing vaccination with friends, can also encourage vaccination. It is important to address individual-level barriers and provide accessible and convenient vaccination services to ensure equitable access to maternal health.
AI Innovations Methodology
To improve access to maternal health, here are some potential recommendations:

1. Mobile Clinics: Implementing mobile clinics that can travel to remote areas or underserved communities can help increase access to maternal health services. These clinics can provide prenatal care, vaccinations, and other essential services to pregnant women who may not have easy access to healthcare facilities.

2. Telemedicine: Utilizing telemedicine technologies can enable pregnant women to receive medical consultations and advice remotely. This can be particularly beneficial for women in rural areas who may have limited access to healthcare facilities. Telemedicine can help address common concerns, provide guidance on prenatal care, and offer support during pregnancy.

3. Community Health Workers: Training and deploying community health workers can improve access to maternal health services. These workers can provide education, counseling, and basic healthcare services to pregnant women in their communities. They can also help identify high-risk pregnancies and refer women to appropriate healthcare facilities.

4. Transportation Support: Lack of transportation can be a significant barrier to accessing maternal health services. Providing transportation support, such as subsidized or free transportation vouchers, can help pregnant women reach healthcare facilities for prenatal care, delivery, and postnatal care.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Data Collection: Gather data on the current state of maternal health access, including information on healthcare facilities, population distribution, transportation infrastructure, and socioeconomic factors. This data can be obtained through surveys, interviews, and existing databases.

2. Modeling: Develop a simulation model that incorporates the collected data and represents the current state of maternal health access. This model should consider factors such as distance to healthcare facilities, availability of transportation, and socioeconomic disparities.

3. Introduce Innovations: Integrate the recommended innovations into the simulation model. This can involve adjusting variables related to mobile clinics, telemedicine availability, community health worker deployment, and transportation support.

4. Simulate Scenarios: Run the simulation model with different scenarios to assess the impact of the innovations on improving access to maternal health. This can involve adjusting variables related to the scale and effectiveness of the innovations, as well as considering different population distributions and socioeconomic factors.

5. Analyze Results: Analyze the simulation results to determine the potential impact of the innovations on improving access to maternal health. This can include evaluating changes in the number of women accessing prenatal care, vaccination rates, and overall maternal health outcomes.

6. Refine and Iterate: Based on the analysis, refine the simulation model and repeat the simulation process to further explore the potential impact of the innovations. This iterative process can help identify the most effective strategies for improving access to maternal health.

By using this methodology, policymakers and healthcare providers can gain insights into the potential impact of different innovations and make informed decisions on how to improve access to maternal health services.

Partagez ceci :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email