Community perceptions of universal health coverage in eight districts of the Northern and Volta regions of Ghana

listen audio

Study Justification:
– The study aims to identify community perceptions of gaps in the Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) Initiative in Ghana, which is the country’s flagship Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Initiative.
– The study seeks to understand the factors that detract from CHPS’ UHC goals and provide recommendations on how to improve its contribution to UHC.
– The research is part of the WHO paradigm for evidence-driven scaling up and follows a strategic approach for assessing community perceptions and implementing research.
Study Highlights:
– The study found that posting trained primary health-care nurses to community locations is strongly supported by focus group participants, even in areas where CHPS is not yet functioning.
– Cultural, financial, and familial constraints to women’s health-seeking autonomy and programmatic lapses were identified as challenges to CHPS services.
– The study highlights the need for improvements in the quality of care, community engagement activities, expansion of services to include emergency referral services, and enhancement of clinical health insurance coverage.
Study Recommendations:
– Improve geographic and financial access to CHPS facilities to achieve Universal Health Coverage.
– Address community needs for improved outreach and service quality.
– Enhance the range of services provided by CHPS to include emergency referral services.
– Enhance clinical health insurance coverage to include preventive health services.
Key Role Players:
– District Health Management Teams (DHMT)
– Community Health Officers (CHOs)
– Volunteers
– Primary health-care nurses
– Social scientists affiliated with the University of Ghana Regional Institute for Population Studies (RIPS) and the University for Development Studies (UDS)
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Training and deployment of primary health-care nurses to community locations
– Community engagement activities
– Expansion of services to include emergency referral services
– Enhancement of clinical health insurance coverage to include preventive health services
Please note that the above information is a summary of the study and its findings. For more detailed information, please refer to the publication “Community perceptions of universal health coverage in eight districts of the Northern and Volta regions of Ghana” in the Global Health Action journal, Volume 13, No. 1, Year 2020.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is based on qualitative formative research and focus group data. The study provides insights into community perceptions of gaps in CHPS maternal and child health services and suggestions for improvement. However, the evidence could be strengthened by including quantitative data and a larger sample size. To improve the evidence, the researchers could consider conducting a survey to gather quantitative data on community perceptions and experiences with CHPS services. Additionally, expanding the sample size and including a more diverse range of participants would enhance the generalizability of the findings.

Background: Ever since Ghana embraced the 1978 Alma-Ata Declaration, it has consigned priority to achieving ‘Health for All.’ The Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) Initiative was established to close gaps in geographic access to services and health equity. CHPS is Ghana’s flagship Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Initiative and will soon completely cover the country with community-located services. Objectives: This paper aims to identify community perceptions of gaps in CHPS maternal and child health services that detract from its UHC goals and to elicit advice on how the contribution of CHPS to UHC can be improved. Method: Three dimensions of access to CHPS care were investigated: geographic, social, and financial. Focus group data were collected in 40 sessions conducted in eight communities located in two districts each of the Northern and Volta Regions. Groups were comprised of 327 participants representing four types of potential clientele: mothers and fathers of children under 5, young men and young women ages 15–24. Results: Posting trained primary health-care nurses to community locations as a means of improving primary health-care access is emphatically supported by focus group participants, even in localities where CHPS is not yet functioning. Despite this consensus, comments on CHPS activities suggest that CHPS services are often compromised by cultural, financial, and familial constraints to women’s health-seeking autonomy and by programmatic lapses constrain implementation of key components of care. Respondents seek improvements in the quality of care, community engagement activities, expansion of the range of services to include emergency referral services, and enhancement of clinical health insurance coverage to include preventive health services. Conclusion: Improving geographic and financial access to CHPS facilities is essential to UHC, but responding to community need for improved outreach, and service quality is equivalently critical to achieving this goal.

This study is a component of the application of the WHO paradigm for evidence-driven scaling up that is known as the ‘Strategic Approach’ for assessing community perceptions of problems to be solved by implementation research [40–42]. Phase 1 in this paradigm is comprised of qualitative formative research that identifies problems and clarifies interventions with thematic analysis. Results identify possible operational improvements that can be subsequently put to trial. Based on the outcome of Phase 2 experimentation, replication studies and scaling up of systems reform follow [21,43]. This study was designed to clarify CHPS reform themes for trial in the CHPS+ initiative [35]. The regional coverage of CHPS in the Volta and Northern Regions is typical of national coverage (Table 1), but health and survival indicators are indicative of greater levels of adversity that the national mortality rates (Table 1). In the Volta Region, the prevailing maternal mortality ratio is over double the national average. The Volta Region is poorer than the national standard, and the Northern Region is poorer still [44]. Women with no educational attainment comprise 28.3% of the Volta Region population versus 58.9% of all women in the Northern Region. The pattern is similar for men (15.3% versus 44.3%) in the Volta and Northern Regions, respectively, [44]. Estimates of key indicators of CHPS service coverage by study regions aDeaths to women during pregnancy and 42 days following delivery per 100,000 live births (2010–2015). bRates calculated as the number of deaths within 28 days of delivery per 1,000 live births. cRates calculated as the number of deaths between birth and 5 years of age per 1,000 live births. dPercent of surgical deliveries. ePercent of women aged 15–49 who are currently using any modern method of contraception. Sources [5,38,47,48]. These regional characteristics are reflected in the profile of focus group participants (Table 2). In the Northern Region, over 40% of the participants lacked any educational attainment (Kumbungu 41%; Gushiegu 44%). Study participants in Nkwanta South, a northern district of the Volta Region, had somewhat lower levels of educational attainment than Kumbungu or Gushiegu, with 61% lacking any education, 15% with primary education and only 11% with secondary education. Somewhat higher levels of educational attainment were evident in Central Tongu, where a majority of participants had middle-school educational attainment (56%) followed by primary (17%) and secondary education (16%). Thus, Northern Region residents, and study participants from that region, are more socio-economically disadvantaged than Volta Region residents. Numbers of focus group participants by SLD, type of participant and type of background characteristics of participants From April to May 2017, CHPS frontline workers were convened by District Health Management Teams (DHMT), informed about study plans, and requested to mobilize participants for group discussions. Sessions were conducted by 10 male and 10 female interviewers, all of whom were hired for the study and trained in focus group methods by social scientists affiliated with the University of Ghana Regional Institute for Population Studies (RIPS) and the University for Development Studies (UDS). The CHPS+ qualitative systems appraisal consisted of 57 FGDs. However, 17 sessions for GHS district staff members, CHOs, and volunteers were excluded from the analysis, yielding 40 sessions comprised of community participants that were convened across eight communities involving 327 participants separated for mothers and fathers of children under 5, young men and young women aged 15 to 24. One session included participation of an adolescent girl who was later discovered to be 13 years old. Although panels also involved leaders comprised of elders, opinion leaders, and chiefs (Table 2), analysis of their perspectives on CHPS appears elsewhere [28], as this investigation focuses on the views of actual or potential clientele of the programme. Sessions were conducted in communities within the four SLDs, half of which were purposefully selected among communities with functional CHPS operations while half were conducted among communities lacking functional CHPS. Discussions were conducted in local languages (Ewe, Dagbani, Likpakpaln and Twi) and subsequently translated and transcribed into English by experts in these languages. Male interviewers conducted sessions with adolescent boys, fathers and elders, while female interviewers conducted sessions involving women and adolescent girls. Interview durations ranged from 50 to 140 minutes. Interviewers instructed participants to reflect on their experiences with CHPS, perception of the programme, and the general system of healthcare serving their locality. Participants were asked to discuss their health-seeking behaviour, delivery preferences, views on mortality risks, and family planning services. Comparisons across discussion sessions were intended to elicit a depiction of the intersection of socio-cultural norms with actual CHPS health-care experiences, providing an ‘open system’ appraisal of the adequacy of CHPS embeddedness in the local social context [19]. Each session was planned to involve eight participants. However, the size of groups varied depending on regional availability and staff allocation – yielding a total of 327 participants. The average ages of participants were 33 years for mothers, 35 years for fathers, 18 years for young girls, 20 years for young boys, and 60 years for community leaders and elders. As Table 2 shows, Gushiegu and Kumbungu are mainly Muslim communities, whereas Central Tongu communities are predominantly Christian with a minority who are traditionalists (7%). Nkwanta South communities were also predominantly Christian (46%) although a significant minority were traditionalists (27%) or participants reporting no religion (24%). FGD guidelines invited open expressions of viewpoints on the CHPS programme by eliciting comment on the location of CHPS services and, for women, their preferred location for delivery services. Participants were encouraged to discuss their views on the causes of morbidity and mortality in their community and the role of CHPS in providing needed care. Operational features of CHPS were also discussed: service content, costs, perceptions of CHPS health-care utility and quality, the adequacy of its range of services, appropriateness attitudes and capabilities of CHPS staff, and constraints, if any, to accessing CHPS services or complying with clinical interventions or prescriptions. For each topic under discussion, participants were invited to discuss both positive and negative perceptions of the programme. For problems that were noted, participants were invited to discuss their recommendations for change. To facilitate systematic understanding of discussion contents, analyses of 40 community transcripts utilized the qualitative analysis software Atlas.ti version 7 [45,46]. Major themes were extracted by three coders using a coding frame initially developed by deploying all coders to a common transcript, and then applying this frame as a template for coding the remainder of the transcripts.

Based on the study titled “Community perceptions of universal health coverage in eight districts of the Northern and Volta regions of Ghana,” one recommendation to improve access to maternal health is to post trained primary health-care nurses to community locations. This recommendation is based on the strong support expressed by focus group participants in the study. By deploying healthcare professionals to areas where maternal health services are lacking, even in localities where the Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) Initiative is not yet functioning, access to maternal health services can be improved.

It is important to note that this recommendation is based on the findings of the study and may require further research and evaluation before implementation. Additionally, other recommendations mentioned in the study, such as improving the quality of care, community engagement activities, expanding the range of services, and enhancing clinical health insurance coverage, can also be considered as potential innovations to improve access to maternal health.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the study titled “Community perceptions of universal health coverage in eight districts of the Northern and Volta regions of Ghana,” the following recommendation can be developed into an innovation to improve access to maternal health:

1. Posting trained primary health-care nurses to community locations: The study found that focus group participants strongly supported the idea of having trained primary health-care nurses stationed in community locations. This recommendation suggests deploying healthcare professionals to areas where maternal health services are lacking, even in localities where the Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) Initiative is not yet functioning. By having healthcare professionals available in the community, access to maternal health services can be improved.

It is important to note that this recommendation is based on the findings of the study and may require further research and evaluation before implementation. Additionally, other recommendations mentioned in the study, such as improving the quality of care, community engagement activities, expanding the range of services, and enhancing clinical health insurance coverage, can also be considered as potential innovations to improve access to maternal health.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the information provided, here are some potential recommendations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Increase the number of trained primary health-care nurses in community locations: This recommendation is supported by focus group participants, even in areas where the Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) Initiative is not yet functioning. By posting trained nurses in community locations, access to primary health care can be improved.

2. Address cultural, financial, and familial constraints: CHPS services are often compromised by these constraints, which limit women’s health-seeking autonomy and hinder the implementation of key components of care. Efforts should be made to address these constraints and promote women’s empowerment in accessing maternal health services.

3. Improve the quality of care: Respondents seek improvements in the quality of care provided by CHPS facilities. This can be achieved through training and capacity building for health-care providers, ensuring the availability of necessary equipment and supplies, and implementing quality assurance mechanisms.

4. Enhance community engagement activities: Community engagement is crucial for the success of maternal health programs. CHPS should involve the community in decision-making processes, raise awareness about maternal health issues, and promote community participation in the planning and implementation of maternal health services.

5. Expand the range of services: Respondents suggest expanding the range of services provided by CHPS to include emergency referral services. This would ensure that women have access to timely and appropriate care in case of complications during pregnancy and childbirth.

6. Enhance clinical health insurance coverage: Clinical health insurance coverage should be expanded to include preventive health services. This would encourage women to seek regular antenatal care and preventive interventions, leading to better maternal health outcomes.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Baseline data collection: Collect data on the current state of access to maternal health services, including geographic, social, and financial barriers. This could involve surveys, interviews, and analysis of existing data.

2. Define indicators: Identify specific indicators that can measure the impact of the recommendations. For example, indicators could include the number of trained nurses in community locations, the percentage of women accessing antenatal care, or the rate of emergency referrals.

3. Develop a simulation model: Use the collected data and indicators to develop a simulation model that can estimate the potential impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This model could be based on mathematical equations, statistical analysis, or computer simulations.

4. Run simulations: Run the simulation model using different scenarios, such as varying the number of trained nurses, expanding the range of services, or enhancing community engagement activities. This will allow for the estimation of the potential impact of each recommendation on improving access to maternal health.

5. Analyze results: Analyze the results of the simulations to determine the potential effectiveness of each recommendation. This could involve comparing different scenarios, identifying key factors that contribute to improved access, and assessing the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of implementing the recommendations.

6. Refine and validate the model: Refine the simulation model based on the analysis of results and feedback from stakeholders. Validate the model by comparing the simulated outcomes with real-world data and conducting sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the results.

By following this methodology, policymakers and stakeholders can gain insights into the potential impact of different recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This can inform decision-making and help prioritize interventions that are most likely to be effective in addressing the identified gaps in maternal and child health services.

Partagez ceci :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email