Operationalising kangaroo Mother care before stabilisation amongst low birth Weight Neonates in Africa (OMWaNA): Protocol for a randomised controlled trial to examine mortality impact in Uganda

listen audio

Study Justification:
– There are 2.5 million neonatal deaths each year, with the majority occurring within 48 hours of birth before stabilisation.
– Kangaroo mother care (KMC) has been shown to significantly reduce mortality in stabilised neonates, but its effect on neonates before stabilisation is unknown.
– The OMWaNA trial aims to determine the effect of initiating KMC before stabilisation on mortality within seven days compared to standard care.
– The trial will provide valuable evidence on the effectiveness of KMC in reducing mortality among vulnerable neonates.
Highlights:
– The OMWaNA trial is a four-centre, open-label, individually randomised, superiority trial conducted in Uganda.
– The trial will enrol 2188 neonates weighing between 700-2000g and aged 1-48 hours.
– Neonates will be randomly allocated to either the intervention arm (KMC) or the control arm (standard care).
– The primary outcome is mortality within seven days, and secondary outcomes include mortality within 28 days, hypothermia prevalence, time to stabilisation or death, admission duration, exclusive breastmilk feeding, readmission frequency, daily weight gain, infant-caregiver attachment, and women’s wellbeing.
– The trial will also assess the incremental costs and cost-effectiveness of KMC compared to standard care.
Recommendations for Lay Reader:
– Kangaroo mother care (KMC) is a method of caring for premature or low birth weight babies by keeping them in skin-to-skin contact with their mothers or caregivers.
– The OMWaNA trial aims to determine if starting KMC before stabilisation can reduce the risk of death in these vulnerable babies.
– The trial will enrol over 2000 neonates in Uganda and compare the outcomes of those receiving KMC to those receiving standard care.
– The primary outcome is mortality within seven days, and secondary outcomes include other health measures and caregiver well-being.
– The findings of this trial will help healthcare providers and policymakers make informed decisions about implementing KMC in hospitals in Africa and Asia, where most newborn deaths occur.
Recommendations for Policy Maker:
– The OMWaNA trial provides an opportunity to assess the effectiveness of kangaroo mother care (KMC) in reducing mortality among neonates before stabilisation.
– The trial will enrol over 2000 neonates in Uganda and compare the outcomes of those receiving KMC to those receiving standard care.
– The primary outcome is mortality within seven days, and secondary outcomes include other health measures and caregiver well-being.
– The findings of this trial will have important policy implications for hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa and southern Asia, where the majority of global newborn deaths occur.
– It is recommended to consider the implementation of KMC as a standard care practice in hospitals to improve neonatal outcomes and reduce mortality.
Key Role Players:
– Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute (MRC/UVRI) and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) Uganda Research Unit
– Makerere University
– LSHTM
– Uganda Paediatrics Association
– Ugandan Ministry of Health Newborn Steering Committee
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Enlargement of KMC areas within neonatal units
– Installation of sinks for infection control
– Additional infrastructure improvements (bathrooms/toilets, office space)
– Recruitment of study medical officers and nurses
– Supplies and equipment (pulse oximeters, oxygen concentrators, thermometers, glucometers, weighing scales, measuring mats, stethoscopes, adjustable beds, KMC wraps)
– Training of neonatal unit staff in KMC and recognition of severe illness
– Cranial ultrasounds (Sonosite Edge II© portable ultrasound machine)
– Data collection and management tools (tablets, REDCap database)
– Monitoring and auditing activities
– Costs for follow-up visits and routine care beyond the study period
Please note that the above cost items are estimates and not actual costs.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong, but there are some areas for improvement.

Background: There are 2.5 million neonatal deaths each year; the majority occur within 48 h of birth, before stabilisation. Evidence from 11 trials shows that kangaroo mother care (KMC) significantly reduces mortality in stabilised neonates; however, data on its effect among neonates before stabilisation are lacking. The OMWaNA trial aims to determine the effect of initiating KMC before stabilisation on mortality within seven days relative to standard care. Secondary objectives include exploring pathways for the intervention’s effects and assessing incremental costs and cost-effectiveness between arms. Methods: We will conduct a four-centre, open-label, individually randomised, superiority trial in Uganda with two parallel groups: An intervention arm allocated to receive KMC and a control arm receiving standard care. We will enrol 2188 neonates (1094 per arm) for whom the indication for KMC is ‘uncertain’, defined as receiving ≥ 1 therapy (e.g. oxygen). Admitted singleton, twin and triplet neonates (triplet if demise before admission of ≥ 1 baby) weighing ≥ 700-≤ 2000 g and aged ≥ 1-< 48 h are eligible. Treatment allocation is random in a 1:1 ratio between groups, stratified by weight and recruitment site. The primary outcome is mortality within seven days. Secondary outcomes include mortality within 28 days, hypothermia prevalence at 24 h, time from randomisation to stabilisation or death, admission duration, time from randomisation to exclusive breastmilk feeding, readmission frequency, daily weight gain, infant-caregiver attachment and women's wellbeing at 28 days. Primary analyses will be by intention-to-treat. Quantitative and qualitative data will be integrated in a process evaluation. Cost data will be collected and used in economic modelling. Discussion: The OMWaNA trial aims to assess the effectiveness of KMC in reducing mortality among neonates before stabilisation, a vulnerable population for whom its benefits are uncertain. The trial will improve understanding of pathways underlying the intervention's effects and will be among the first to rigorously compare the incremental cost and cost-effectiveness of KMC relative to standard care. The findings are expected to have broad applicability to hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa and southern Asia, where three-quarters of global newborn deaths occur, as well as important policy and programme implications.

This manuscript has been prepared according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) statement (Additional file 1). The primary objective of the OMWaNA trial is to determine the effect of KMC initiated before stabilisation on mortality within seven days relative to standard care among neonates weighing ≤ 2000 g. Secondary objectives include: This is a four-centre, open-label, individually randomised, superiority trial with two parallel groups: an intervention arm allocated to receive KMC and a control arm allocated to receive standard care. Treatment allocation is random in a 1:1 ratio between groups. The host institution for the trial is the Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute (MRC/UVRI) and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) Uganda Research Unit in Entebbe. The trial is being undertaken in collaboration with Makerere University and LSHTM. The trial is being conducted at four Ugandan government hospitals: Entebbe, Jinja and Masaka Regional Referral Hospitals and Iganga District Hospital (Fig. 1). Map of Uganda showing location of the four OMWaNA trial hospitals. Source of map data: Google Maps©, 2019 Uganda has a population of 42.9 million and is ranked 162/189 on the Human Development Index (2017) [31]. The population is predominately rural (76%) and the poverty incidence is 27% nationally [32]. Poverty rates vary considerably, with the highest rates occurring in rural areas where subsistence farming is the primary source of income. The Busoga sub-region, where Jinja and Iganga are located, has the third highest incidence of poverty in the country (42.1%), while the Wakiso sub-region, where Entebbe is located, has the second lowest (7.5%) [32]. In Uganda, the neonatal mortality rate is estimated at 19.9 per 1000 live births, with a resultant 32,296 deaths in 2018 [1]. Complications of prematurity are responsible for 27% of neonatal deaths [33], as compared to 35% globally [1]. An estimated 107,921 (7%) Ugandan babies were born preterm in 2014 [5]. Characteristics of the four trial hospitals are shown in Table 1. Each hospital has a neonatal special care unit, which accepts referrals from their respective region/district. The level of equipment in these government facilities differs, but all have: bag-mask resuscitation; incubators and/or overhead radiant heaters for thermal support; intravenous (IV) fluids, nasogastric tubes and syringes for feeding support; oxygen supply (concentrators or cylinders) and nasal prongs for respiratory support; IV and oral antibiotics; phototherapy for jaundice; aminophylline for prematurity-associated apnoea; and phenobarbital for seizures. Pulse oximetry and improvised bubble continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilation are available at some of the trial hospitals. Invasive ventilation and surfactant are unavailable at all sites. Standard care at the four sites involves provision of intermittent KMC to neonates weighing ≤ 2000 g once stable, in line with current WHO guidelines. Characteristics of Ugandan trial hospitals, with resource availability in February 2019 CPAP continuous positive airway pressure, KMC kangaroo mother care, NA not applicable a Neonatal admissions data were not available for Masaka Hospital b The neonatal unit at Entebbe Hospital has six government-employed nurses and two volunteer nurses The trial will include admitted neonates weighing ≤ 2000 g for whom the indication for KMC is ‘uncertain’ according to WHO guidelines concerning clinical stability [10]. Eligibility criteria are listed below. Inclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: The schedule of procedures for the OMWaNA trial is outlined in Fig. 2. OMWaNA trial schedule of enrolment, interventions and assessments 1. The start of trial procedures (time 0) is defined as when the pulse oximeter is attached for cardio-respiratory monitoring 2. All participants are reviewed daily while admitted to the hospital 3. All participants receive continuous monitoring of heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation (SpO2) for 72 h after randomisation. Continuous monitoring continues until participants no longer require any form of respiratory support 4. HR, SpO2, axillary temperature and respiratory rate are measured every 6 h until stability criteria are met, after which the frequency transitions to daily 5. Blood glucose is measured daily and may be discontinued once the participant tolerates full enteral feeds 6. Participants are weighed on day 5, then daily until discharge (unless deemed too unstable by site study staff) 7. Socioeconomic data, including household details, are collected within 48 h of enrolment. During this time, study staff also inform families that they will be asked about their household expenditures and activities over the coming month 8. For participants at Entebbe and Jinja Hospitals, cranial ultrasounds are performed on days 1, 3 and 7 of hospitalisation (or as an outpatient if discharged before day 7) and on follow-up at day 28–30 9. The Women’s Capabilities Index (WCI) is administered to all mothers within 48 h of enrolment and on days 28–30 to assess women’s wellbeing 10. The Maternal Infant Responsiveness Instrument (MIRI) is administered on days 28–30 to assess infant-caregiver attachment 11. Duration of admission is measured as the mean time (days and hours) from hospital admission to discharge Figure 3 describes the flow of participants from the time of screening through follow-up at 28–30 days. Overview of trial flow including routine procedures and key criteria for eligibility screening, assessing severe illness and stopping KMC 1. Refusal to feed, feed intolerance or abdominal distension (after starting feeds) 2. Increased respiratory support defined as new oxygen or CPAP requirement 3. Axillary temperature < 35.5°C after 1 h of observed skin-to-skin contact, not associated with environment or with hypoglycaemia 4. For participants at EH and JH, cranial ultrasounds will be performed on days 1, 3 and 7 of hospitalisation (or as an outpatient if discharged before day 7) and on follow-up at days 28–30. CPAP continuous positive airway pressure, EH Entebbe Hospital, HC head circumference, JH Jinja Hospital. a Screening for eligibility. b Signs of severe illness. c Suspected infection criteria. d Criteria for stopping KMC All admitted neonates weighing ≤ 2000 g at the four trial hospitals will be screened for eligibility by a study nurse or medical officer (Fig. ​(Fig.3a,3a, ‘Screening for eligibility’). Eligibility will be assessed as soon as possible after admission and once the baby is aged ≥ 1 h to allow for transition immediately after birth. This is in recognition of the large physiological changes that take place following delivery and that the stability of a newborn aged < 1 h may change rapidly and not accurately reflect their subsequent clinical trajectory. Trained study staff will ascertain chronological age and relevant pregnancy details by examining source documents and/or conducting a standardised maternal interview. Weight will be measured using the Seca™ 384 electronic weighing scale. A focused examination will be conducted to assess for the presence of major congenital malformations, severe jaundice and seizures. Neonates for whom KMC is indicated per WHO guidelines (i.e. are considered ‘stable’) will be excluded and receive KMC as part of standard care (Fig. ​(Fig.3a,3a, ‘Stable to receive KMC’). Neonates for whom the indication for KMC is ‘uncertain’ per WHO guidelines (i.e. are ‘prior to stability’) will be further assessed. For those neonates who are found to meet eligibility criteria (Fig. ​(Fig.3a,3a, ‘Screening for eligibility’), a trained member of the study staff will monitor HR and SpO2 using a Masimo Rad-8© pulse oximeter for 10 min and measure respiratory rate manually by counting breaths for 1 min. Those found to meet the criteria for ‘life-threatening instability’ (Fig. ​(Fig.3a,3a, ‘Too unstable’), or who have seizures or jaundice requiring treatment, will not be eligible for immediate recruitment and will enter a cycle of reassessment every 3 h. All will continue to receive clinically indicated treatments and cardiorespiratory monitoring at the discretion of the on-duty paediatrician, medical officer or nurse. If, during any reassessment within the first 48 h, a neonate is found to have improved and no longer meets exclusion criteria, recruitment may proceed. Neonates who continue to have life-threatening instability or meet other exclusion criteria by 48 h will be permanently excluded. Written informed consent will be sought from the parents of all participants for the following: neonatal inclusion in the study; collection of sociodemographic and clinical data; and randomisation to a study arm. Consent will also be obtained for the possibility that the caregiver will provide continuous skin-to-skin contact, if randomised to that arm. Additionally, consent will be obtained for the collection of household socioeconomic and cost data, as well as data on infant–caregiver attachment and women’s wellbeing. Study medical officers or nurses will request informed consent. The preferred person to provide informed consent for neonatal involvement is the mother. If a mother is unavailable or too ill to provide consent, consent can be obtained from the father. Once the mother is available and feeling well enough, the informed consent process will be repeated to confirm her consent for her baby’s continued participation. An impartial and literate witness will be used during consent for non-literate parents, as per International Council for Harmonisation-Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidance. Study staff will be trained in infection prevention and standard operating procedures (SOP) will detail infection control measures for the use of study equipment to avoid contamination between participants. Axillary temperature will be measured with a digital thermometer in degrees Celsius; three measurements will be taken to enable calculation of the mean value. Respiratory rate will be measured manually by counting breaths for 1 min. Blood glucose will be measured with a capillary sample using the study glucometer. Head circumference (HC) will be measured and a physical examination will be conducted. Baseline clinical and anthropometric data will be collected as soon as possible after enrolment, with the exception of gestational age and crown-foot length, which may be delayed to within 48 h of enrolment. Gestational age will be estimated using Ballard score [34], last menstrual period and foot length [35]. Length will be measured using the Seca™ 210 neonatal measuring mat. Socioeconomic data, including household details, will be collected within 48 h of enrolment using standardised parent interviews. The Women’s Capabilities Index (WCI) questionnaire will also be administered to mothers during this timeframe. Study staff will also inform families that, over the coming month, they will be asked about their expenditures and the activities of members of their household in order to evaluate the economic impact of KMC relative to standard care. Treatment allocation is random in a 1:1 ratio between groups using permuted blocks of varying block sizes. The allocation sequence was computer-generated centrally at MRC/UVRI by an independent statistician, stratified by birthweight ( 90% in room air; (2) no need for supplemental oxygen or CPAP; (3) respiratory rate 40–< 60 breaths/min; (4) no apnoea; (5) HR 80–< 180 beats/min; (6) axillary temperature 36.0–37.4 °C; and (7) no need for IV fluids. These criteria are consistent with those being used in the WHO-led Immediate KMC (I-KMC) trial [37]. Once stable, neonates can transition to routine (intermittent) KMC with the caregiver in line with standard care at the trial sites. As in the intervention arm, neonates in the control arm who meet any of the criteria for stopping KMC (Fig. ​(Fig.3d,3d, ‘Criteria for stopping KMC) will be cared for in an overhead heater or incubator until restart criteria are met. Participant flow around the study sites is illustrated in Fig. 5, using Entebbe Hospital as an example. All neonates are initially stabilised and assessed at a radiant heater. While clinically ‘unstable’, neonates allocated to KMC are cared for in a study bed and those allocated to standard care are cared for in an incubator or radiant heater. Participants in both arms are transferred to the KMC step-down unit once they meet stability criteria. Study site participant flow for the OMWaNA trial. Inc incubator, RH radiant heater Substantial expansion of neonatal care capacity and infrastructure at all trial sites has been embedded within the OMWaNA trial. This includes enlargement of the KMC areas within the neonatal units to ensure that all neonates, whether in KMC or not, can be cared for safely. Additional infrastructure improvements include sinks to provide an optimal environment for infection control, bathrooms/toilets for mothers/caregivers and office space for clinical staff. One study medical officer and 4–5 study nurses have been recruited to join the clinical teams at each site. Further, each site will be provided with the following supplies and equipment: six Masimo Rad-8© oximeters with neonatal sensors; one oxygen concentrator; two thermometers; one glucometer with blood glucose testing strips; one neonatal ventilation bag and mask; one Seca™ 384 neonatal weighing scale; one Seca™ 210 neonatal measuring mat; 2–3 paediatric stethoscopes; and a minimum of four adjustable beds. In addition, KMC wraps will be provided to support practice in each unit. All participants will be evaluated at least once by a study paediatrician or medical officer during the first 24 h after randomisation. All participants will receive continuous monitoring and recording of HR and SpO2 for 72 h after randomisation. Continuous monitoring will continue until participants no longer require any form of respiratory support. HR, SpO2, axillary temperature and respiratory rate will be measured and recorded by a study nurse every 6 h until stability criteria are met, after which the frequency will transition to daily. According to the same frequency, a study nurse will observe and record the presence or absence of clinical signs of respiratory distress, including chest in-drawing, nasal flaring and grunting. Blood glucose will be measured every 6 h during the first 24 h after randomisation unless it is < 2.6 mmol/L, in which case it will be measured hourly until two or more consecutive readings are in normal range (2.6–6.9 mmol/L). Subsequently, blood glucose will be measured daily until a participant is tolerating full enteral feeds. All enrolled neonates will receive clinically indicated treatments, including but not limited to oxygen, IV fluids (given by bolus or burette), antibiotics, aminophylline, anticonvulsant medicines and phototherapy. Standardised clinical guidelines will be followed for common neonatal conditions, including preterm fluids/feeding (including breastfeeding), suspected and proven sepsis, respiratory distress, jaundice and seizures. Bubble CPAP will be provided at the discretion of the on-duty paediatrician at sites where this is the standard of care. Jaundice will be treated with phototherapy for neonates in both arms. All caregivers will be trained in KMC regardless of study arm. Neonatal unit staff at all sites will be trained to recognise signs of severe illness (Fig. ​(Fig.3b,3b, ‘Signs of severe illness) and to inform study staff if a participant meets any of these criteria. The study paediatrician or medical officer (or study nurse if neither is present) will examine the neonate as soon as possible to assess whether signs of early-onset (< 72 h of age) or late-onset (≥ 72 h of age) infection (Fig. ​(Fig.3c,3c, ‘Suspected infection criteria’) are present. Neonates will be reassessed for signs of severe illness and infection during daily rounds. Where available, a blood culture will be obtained as soon as possible if a neonate meets criteria for suspected infection; however, this will not delay administration of antibiotic therapy. Study staff will also assess if the neonate meets criteria for temporary withdrawal from KMC (Fig. ​(Fig.3d,3d, ‘Criteria for stopping KMC’). At the discretion of the study paediatrician, neonates may be referred to a higher-level facility for more specialised care; however, existing data indicate that this is an uncommon occurrence. At the time of discharge, all caregivers will be provided with an illustrated handout on neonatal danger signs and instructed to contact the site study team or seek medical help if their baby becomes unwell. Caregivers of babies in both arms will be encouraged to continue KMC at home. All participants will be given an appointment to attend the follow-up clinic at the respective study site on days 28–30. At this visit, cranial ultrasound (Entebbe and Jinja Hospitals only) and anthropometry will be performed, feeding practices and outcomes (alive, dead, readmitted) will be documented, and the WCI and Maternal Infant Responsiveness Instrument (MIRI) questionnaires will be administered to mothers. If participants are discharged before day 7, additional follow-up will be arranged according to study site. If participants do not attend the follow-up visit, a telephone call will be made the same day to ascertain outcome and feeding practices and to arrange follow-up, either in the clinic or at the families’ home, as soon as possible. Routine follow-up beyond the planned study follow-ups will be provided by the study staff according to standard practice and based upon the clinical need of the baby. Adverse events (AE) are medical events or laboratory findings, which result in a change in clinical management after randomisation and until 28 days after birth. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalisation or prolongation of hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability, or requires intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage [38]. Study medical officers and nurses will inform the site paediatrician about any SAE occurrence within 24 h. SAEs will be followed up by the paediatrician until their resolution or stabilisation, or until causality is determined to be unrelated to the trial intervention. If a serious but unexpected AE occurs, which might be related to the trial intervention, a SAE report will be submitted to the Research Ethics Committees (REC) at UVRI and LSHTM within 48 h of the investigators becoming aware of the event, with a follow-up report provided within a further five working days. This expedited reporting will be limited to those outcomes not already listed as primary or secondary outcomes, yet which might reasonably occur as a consequence of the trial intervention. All SAEs will be reported to the Sponsor and RECs as part of their respective annual progress and safety report. The DSMB will oversee the overall integrity of the study, its safety and its continued relevance and ability to answer the primary objective. DSMB members include a perinatal epidemiologist/statistician (chair), a South African neonatologist and a neonatal bioethicist. The DSMB will receive a summary of SAEs after one month of recruitment, then move to every three or six months; the DSMB will decide the frequency following the first report. An interim analysis will be performed on the primary outcome when approximately half of neonates have been randomised. An independent statistician will perform the interim analysis, blinded to treatment allocation and report to the DSMB. Analyses will be unblinded at the request of the DSMB. In light of these data and other evidence from relevant studies, the DSMB will inform the Trial Steering Committee (TSC) if in their view: it is evident that no clear outcome will be obtained with the current trial design; they have a major ethical or safety concern; or it is evident that the intervention is clearly superior and continuing the trial would be unethical to those in the control arm. The TSC will make the final decision on study continuation. The study will be monitored by the Reciprocal Monitoring Scheme of the East African Consortium for Clinical Research in collaboration with the Research Compliance and Quality Assurance section of the MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Unit. Dedicated study monitors, independent of the study team, will oversee progress and ensure the trial is conducted and data are handled in accordance with the protocol, SOPs and applicable ethical and regulatory requirements. In addition, the UVRI REC will conduct initial site visits with neonatal specialists from the Uganda Paediatrics Association and the Ugandan Ministry of Health Newborn Steering Committee. The trial may be subject to audit by LSHTM under their remit as Sponsor, the Study Coordination Centre and other regulatory bodies to ensure adherence to GCP. The primary outcome is all-cause early neonatal mortality (within seven days). Estimates suggest that three-quarters of neonatal deaths occur in the first week of life [2]. Secondary outcomes are as listed below. Axillary temperature will be assessed using a digital thermometer. The date and time of randomisation and clinical stabilisation will be prospectively recorded. Stability is defined as having met all of the following criteria for a continuous period of at least 24 h: The date and time of death will be prospectively recorded from the death certificate for in-hospital deaths. For deaths occurring after discharge, the date will be recorded according to verbal report by the parent/caregiver. The date and time of randomisation and initiation of exclusive breastmilk feeding will be prospectively recorded. Exclusive breastmilk feeding is defined as receiving breastmilk, either directly from the breast or by nasogastric tube, bottle, cup or spoon after expression from the breast, as the sole source of nutrition [39]. The date and time of admission and discharge will be documented prospectively for the first admission episode. This outcome will be documented at the follow-up visit on days 28–30. If participants do not attend, a telephone call will be made the same day to ascertain outcome. Episodes in which a neonate who had been discharged from a hospital is readmitted to the same hospital during the first 28 days will be prospectively recorded. Episodes in which a neonate is readmitted to a different hospital will be recorded according to verbal report by the parent/caregiver on follow-up at days 28–30. Mean daily weight gain will be calculated as the difference between weight at enrolment and on follow-up at days 28–30, as measured by the study scale. Women’s wellbeing will be assessed using the WCI, a capability-based composite measure of quality of life that will capture the broader effects to the mother of practicing KMC. The WCI includes six domains (physical strength, inner wellbeing, household wellbeing, community relations, economic security, happiness), with a total of 26 sub-dimensions [40]. Developed and validated in Malawi, the WCI was recently adapted for use in Uganda [41]. Infant–caregiver attachment will be assessed using the MIRI, a 22-item questionnaire that measures maternal recognition of responsiveness to infant cues, maternal recognition of infant responsiveness and difficulties in responsiveness [42]. The MIRI was developed and validated in the United States, and is now being used in Uganda [43]. Understanding the hypothesised causal pathways for clinical effects of the intervention (objective 3) will be achieved by measurement of the following process outcomes, which are categorised as providing very early (within 24 h), early (within 72 h) or late clinical impact. Proportion of time spent with suboptimal HR (< 100 bpm) and SpO2 (< 85%) over the first 24 h and 72 h after randomisation, measured and recorded continuously using the study pulse oximeter. Axillary temperature will be assessed using a digital thermometer. Hypothermia density is defined as the proportion of time the axillary temperature is < 36.5 °C during a defined time period. Axillary temperature will be measured every 6 h during the first 24 h after randomisation and until clinically stable, after which it is measured daily. Blood glucose will be measured using a study glucometer and glucose testing strips. IVH is a complication of prematurity characterised by bleeding within the cerebral ventricles, typically originating from the periventricular germinal matrix; severity ranges from grade 1 (mild) to grade 4 (severe) [44]. Late intracerebral sequelae include cystic degeneration, post-haemorrhagic hydrocephalus and cerebral atrophy. The study paediatrician or medical officer at two of the four hospitals (Entebbe and Jinja) will perform cranial ultrasounds using a Sonosite Edge II© portable ultrasound machine. Both standard and linear probes will be used to assess for abnormalities according to a defined protocol and will include ≥ 11 coronal and sagittal views. Images will be read by an independent expert. Trial data will be electronically entered into trial-specific case report forms on tablets using an offline, mobile REDCap application, with inbuilt ranges and consistency checks. Data from tablets will be synchronised once daily over a secure connection with the web-based REDCap database, hosted at the MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Unit data centre. Cardiorespiratory data from Masimo Rad-8© oximeters will be downloaded using Stowood Visi-Download™ software, captured in CSV files, securely transmitted to MRC/UVRI, analysed with PROFOX™ software and reconciled with the trial database. Cranial ultrasound images will be stored in OsiriX Dicom™ software and interpreted blind to allocation and clinical details. Logs linking parent/caregiver names and residence location will be stored separately on password-protected computers, with a hard copy stored in locked cabinets in secure rooms at all sites. All data will be stored in institutional servers at the MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Unit during the study. Data from the web-based REDCap database will be downloaded and stored on institutional servers at LSHTM in London for access by the PIs and independent statistician for analysis and preparation of reports for the DSMB, respectively. These secure, password-protected servers are only accessible within the LSHTM network and activity is fully audited, recording both login details and file system access. Access will be limited to essential research personnel. Assuming a control mortality rate of 25% across the four recruitment sites, 1750 neonates (875 per arm) would enable us to detect a relative difference between arms of 22.4% (5.6% absolute difference) with 80% power and a significance level of 5%. If the control mortality rate were in fact as low as 18%, we would still be able to detect a relative difference of 27% (absolute difference of 4.8%). We plan to recruit 2188 neonates (1094 per arm) in order to allow for 10% withdrawal due to clinical deteriorations and consent withdrawal, and 10% dilution due to non-compliance and loss to follow-up. This sample size would enable us to detect absolute reductions of 6.3% and 5.4% from control rates of 25% and 18%, respectively, with 90% power. Baseline characteristics of enrolled neonates will be summarised by treatment arm. Descriptive statistics for continuous variables will include mean, standard deviation, median, range and number of observations. Categorical variables will be summarised as counts and proportions. Participant flow through screening, randomisation, allocation and follow-up will be illustrated in a CONSORT diagram (Fig. 6), with reasons for exclusion, non-adherence, loss to follow-up and non-analysis documented. CONSORT flow diagram for the OMWaNA trial Primary and secondary outcome analyses will be carried out on all neonates as randomised (‘intention-to-treat’). The rate of loss to follow-up will be reported. We will report risk ratios for mortality within seven days (primary outcome) and 28 days (secondary outcome) for intervention versus control with associated 95% confidence intervals (CI). Time from randomisation to death, time from randomisation to exclusive breastmilk feeding and length of stay will be analysed using Kaplan–Meier plots and hazard ratios, with accompanying 95% CI calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression. All other secondary outcomes will be analysed using appropriate regression models accounting for the nature of the distribution of the outcome, and results will be presented as appropriate effect sizes with a measure of precision (95% CI). Both unadjusted analyses and analyses adjusted for stratification factors will be carried out. Additional exploratory analyses will control for any baseline measures that appear to be imbalanced between arms. Subgroup analyses are planned to explore between-group differences in the impact of KMC relative to standard care on mortality by gestational age ( 32 weeks), birthweight (< 1000, 1000–1499 or ≥ 1500 g) and recruitment site. Gestational age is an important predictor of newborn survival. In settings with newborn special care without intensive care, such as the four trial hospitals, neonatal mortality rates are 86% in neonates born at < 28 weeks and 41% in neonates born at 28–31 weeks [45]. Further exploratory analyses will be carried out to explore the association between mortality and time of initiation (< 12, 12– < 24 or ≥ 24 h), and continuity of KMC (median hours per day: < 6, 6– < 12, 12– < 18 or 18–24 h). The process evaluation is being conducted to strengthen understanding of KMC initiation before stabilisation on neonatal health outcomes, considering both intended (beneficial) and unintended (negative) clinical effects. Changes in neonatal care between hospitals and from before the trial will also be assessed. This evaluation will be conducted in accordance with the MRC guidance on process evaluation of complex interventions [46], and will integrate quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative outputs will include data related to causal pathways for clinical effects, neonatal admissions data, and health system- and facility-level survey data. Quantitative data will be summarised using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data will be collected though in-depth interviews, focus group discussions and workshops with parents/caregivers, healthcare providers and other key stakeholders to identify experiences of KMC and explore facilitators and barriers to inform uptake and sustainability. These data will be analysed using a thematic content approach. An iterative methodology will be used with data collected at several time points and then used to inform later explorations. Intervention reporting will follow the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) [47], which will ensure a shared understanding of all activities related to the trial intervention and, if shown to be effective, how these relate to any proposed scale-up activities. In addition, the TIDieR will facilitate thoughtful consideration regarding the transferability of findings outside a trial setting and to other hospitals in Uganda and elsewhere. The incremental cost, cost-effectiveness, budget impact and equity of KMC for neonates before stabilisation relative to standard care will be examined from both an aggregated and a disaggregated societal perspective (provider and household combined), in accordance with the reference case [48]. Effects of the intervention on neonatal health and maternal wellbeing will be assessed. Both financial costs, which reflect actual monies paid, and economic costs, which reflect the full value of resources used, will be examined. Multiple data sources will be triangulated to arrive at best estimates. Where possible, resource use and unit costs will be collected and presented separately, although some costs, such as out-of-pocket payments for transport, do not permit this. Household costs will be collected through surveys amongst a sample of caregivers at the time of discharge and during follow-up visits. Costs to providers will be collected prospectively and retrospectively using project accounts, key informant interviews, facility audits, direct observations and time-use surveys. As necessary, secondary data on costs of treating subsequent conditions may be supplemented with limited primary data collection in the trial hospitals. Costs and effects will be modelled using a lifetime time horizon.

The innovation described in the manuscript is the Operationalising Kangaroo Mother Care before Stabilisation Among Low Birth Weight Neonates in Africa (OMWaNA) trial. This trial aims to determine the effect of initiating Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) before stabilisation on mortality within seven days relative to standard care for neonates weighing ≤2000g. The trial will also explore pathways for the intervention’s effects and assess the incremental costs and cost-effectiveness between the two arms. The trial will be conducted in four Ugandan government hospitals and will enroll 2188 neonates. The primary outcome is mortality within seven days, and secondary outcomes include mortality within 28 days, hypothermia prevalence at 24 hours, time from randomisation to stabilisation or death, admission duration, time from randomisation to exclusive breastmilk feeding, readmission frequency, daily weight gain, infant-caregiver attachment, and women’s wellbeing at 28 days. The trial will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of KMC in reducing mortality among neonates before stabilisation, particularly in low-resource settings.
AI Innovations Description
The recommendation to improve access to maternal health is to implement the Operationalising Kangaroo Mother Care before Stabilisation Among Low Birth Weight Neonates in Africa (OMWaNA) protocol. This protocol involves conducting a randomised controlled trial in Uganda to examine the impact of initiating Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) before stabilisation on mortality within seven days compared to standard care.

KMC is a method of caring for preterm and low birth weight infants by providing skin-to-skin contact between the baby and the mother or caregiver. It has been shown to significantly reduce mortality in stabilised neonates, but its effect on neonates before stabilisation is not well understood.

The OMWaNA trial aims to enrol 2188 neonates weighing between 700-2000g and aged 1-48 hours, for whom the indication for KMC is uncertain. The neonates will be randomly assigned to either the intervention arm, which will receive KMC, or the control arm, which will receive standard care. The primary outcome of the trial is mortality within seven days, and secondary outcomes include mortality within 28 days, hypothermia prevalence, time to stabilisation or death, admission duration, time to exclusive breastmilk feeding, readmission frequency, daily weight gain, infant-caregiver attachment, and women’s wellbeing.

The trial will also include a process evaluation to assess the pathways for the intervention’s effects and to explore the incremental costs and cost-effectiveness of KMC compared to standard care. The findings of the trial are expected to have broad applicability to hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa and southern Asia, where the majority of global newborn deaths occur.

By implementing the OMWaNA protocol, healthcare providers can improve access to maternal health by implementing evidence-based interventions such as KMC, which has the potential to reduce neonatal mortality and improve outcomes for preterm and low birth weight infants.
AI Innovations Methodology
The manuscript describes a randomized controlled trial called OMWaNA, which aims to assess the effectiveness of kangaroo mother care (KMC) in reducing mortality among neonates before stabilization. KMC involves skin-to-skin contact between the mother and the baby, providing warmth, breastfeeding support, and bonding.

To improve access to maternal health, here are some potential recommendations:

1. Increase awareness and education: Implement community-based education programs to raise awareness about the benefits of KMC and provide information on how to practice it effectively. This can be done through antenatal care visits, community health workers, and mass media campaigns.

2. Strengthen healthcare infrastructure: Ensure that healthcare facilities have the necessary equipment and resources to support KMC, such as incubators, radiant heaters, pulse oximeters, and weighing scales. This will enable healthcare providers to provide optimal care to neonates and support mothers in practicing KMC.

3. Train healthcare providers: Provide training and capacity-building programs for healthcare providers on KMC and its implementation. This will ensure that healthcare providers have the knowledge and skills to support and guide mothers in practicing KMC effectively.

4. Support for mothers: Provide support to mothers in practicing KMC, including counseling, breastfeeding support, and psychosocial support. This can be done through trained healthcare providers, support groups, and community-based organizations.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Define the target population: Identify the population that would benefit from improved access to maternal health, such as pregnant women and neonates in low-resource settings.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather data on the current status of access to maternal health, including factors such as availability of healthcare facilities, healthcare provider capacity, awareness and knowledge of KMC, and current practices.

3. Define indicators: Determine the key indicators that will be used to measure the impact of the recommendations, such as the percentage of neonates receiving KMC, neonatal mortality rates, and maternal satisfaction with healthcare services.

4. Develop a simulation model: Create a simulation model that incorporates the baseline data and the potential impact of the recommendations. The model should consider factors such as population size, healthcare infrastructure, training programs, and support services.

5. Run simulations: Use the simulation model to run various scenarios that reflect the implementation of the recommendations. This could involve adjusting parameters such as the coverage of education programs, the availability of resources, and the effectiveness of training programs.

6. Analyze results: Analyze the results of the simulations to assess the potential impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This could include comparing indicators before and after the implementation of the recommendations, as well as conducting sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the findings.

7. Interpret findings: Interpret the findings of the simulations to understand the potential benefits and challenges of implementing the recommendations. Consider factors such as cost-effectiveness, feasibility, and scalability.

8. Make recommendations: Based on the findings, make recommendations for policymakers, healthcare providers, and other stakeholders on how to improve access to maternal health. This could include specific actions to implement the recommendations and strategies for monitoring and evaluation.

By following this methodology, policymakers and healthcare providers can gain insights into the potential impact of innovations and recommendations on improving access to maternal health, such as the implementation of KMC. This can inform decision-making and resource allocation to support effective interventions and improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes.

Partagez ceci :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email