Antiretroviral treatment and prevention of peripartum and postnatal HIV transmission in West Africa: Evaluation of a two-tiered approach

listen audio

Study Justification:
– The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a two-tiered strategy for preventing mother-to-child transmission of HIV in resource-limited settings in West Africa.
– The use of highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) for HIV-infected pregnant women has only recently been recommended, and there is a need to document experiences from African countries.
– The study will provide evidence on the short-term and long-term effectiveness of the two-tiered approach in preventing peripartum and postnatal HIV transmission.
Highlights:
– The study included pregnant women enrolled in the MTCT-Plus Initiative, a comprehensive HIV care and treatment program for pregnant and postpartum women and their families.
– Women meeting the eligibility criteria received HAART, while women with less advanced HIV disease received short-course antiretroviral (scARV) PMTCT regimens.
– The rate of peripartum HIV transmission was found to be 2.2% and the cumulative rate at 12 months was 5.7%.
– The overall probability of infant death or HIV infection was 4.3% at 4 weeks and 11.7% at 12 months.
– The two-tiered strategy was deemed safe and highly effective for short- and long-term prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in resource-constrained settings.
Recommendations:
– The study recommends the implementation of the two-tiered strategy for preventing mother-to-child transmission of HIV in resource-limited settings.
– Access to HAART should be provided to pregnant women who need treatment for their own health.
– Breastfeeding practices should follow WHO guidelines, with the option of using breast milk substitutes if feasible and affordable.
Key Role Players:
– Healthcare providers: Physicians, nurses, and other healthcare professionals involved in the care and treatment of pregnant women and their families.
– Policy makers: Government officials and policymakers responsible for implementing and funding HIV prevention and treatment programs.
– Community organizations: Non-governmental organizations and community-based organizations involved in HIV advocacy and support services.
– International organizations: Organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNAIDS that provide guidance and support for HIV prevention and treatment programs.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Antiretroviral drugs: Budget for the procurement and distribution of antiretroviral drugs for pregnant women and their families.
– Laboratory testing: Budget for HIV testing, viral load testing, CD4 count testing, and other laboratory tests required for monitoring and evaluation.
– Healthcare personnel: Budget for training, salaries, and other costs associated with healthcare providers involved in the implementation of the two-tiered strategy.
– Infrastructure and equipment: Budget for the establishment or improvement of healthcare facilities, including equipment and supplies needed for HIV care and treatment.
– Community outreach and education: Budget for community engagement, awareness campaigns, and educational materials to promote the two-tiered strategy and encourage adherence to treatment and prevention guidelines.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong, but there are some areas for improvement. The study design is observational, which limits the ability to establish causation. Additionally, the sample size is relatively small, which may affect the generalizability of the findings. To improve the evidence, future studies could consider using a randomized controlled trial design and increasing the sample size to enhance statistical power.

Background: Highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) has only been recently recommended for HIV-infected pregnant women requiring treatment for their own health in resource-limited settings. However, there are few documented experiences from African countries. We evaluated the short-term (4 wk) and long-term (12 mo) effectiveness of a two-tiered strategy of prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) in Africa: women meeting the eligibility criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO) received HAART, and women with less advanced HIV disease received short-course antiretroviral (scARV) PMTCT regimens. Methods and Findings: The MTCT-Plus Initiative is a multi-country, family-centred HIV care and treatment program for pregnant and postpartum women and their families. Pregnant women enrolled in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire received either HAART for their own health or short-course antiretroviral (scARV) PMTCT regimens according to their clinical and immunological status. Plasma HIV-RNA viral load (VL) was measured to diagnose peripartum infection when infants were 4 wk of age, and HIV final status was documented either by rapid antibody testing when infants were aged ≥ 12 mo or by plasma VL earlier. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the rate of HIV transmission and HIV-free survival. Between August 2003 and June 2005, 107 women began HAART at a median of 30 wk of gestation, 102 of them with zidovudine (ZDV), lamivudine (3TC), and nevirapine (NVP) and they continued treatment postpartum; 143 other women received scARV for PMTCT, 103 of them with sc(ZDV+3TC) with single-dose NVP during labour. Most (75%) of the infants were breast-fed for a median of 5 mo. Overall, the rate of peripartum HIV transmission was 2.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3%-4.2%) and the cumulative rate at 12 mo was 5.7% (95% CI 2.5%-9.0%). The overall probability of infant death or infection with HIV was 4.3% (95% CI 1.7%-7.0%) at age week 4 wk and 11.7% (95% CI 7.5%-15.9%) at 12 mo. Conclusions: This two-tiered strategy appears to be safe and highly effective for short- and long-term PMTCT in resource-constrained settings. These results indicate a further benefit of access to HAART for pregnant women who need treatment for their own health. © 2007 Tonwe-Gold et al.

This observational cohort included women enrolled in the MTCT-Plus Initiative, a multi-country, comprehensive HIV care and treatment program for pregnant and postpartum women and their families built on existing PMTCT services. It provides pregnant and postpartum women with holistic, family-centred HIV care including HAART to the woman, her partner, and her children [17]. Pregnant women identified as HIV-infected at two community-based antenatal clinics in two low-income urban districts of Abidjan were referred for enrolment into the MTCT-Plus program. The study population included all HIV-infected pregnant women and their live-born infants enrolled between August 2003 and April 2005 and followed until a final paediatric HIV status could be determined. Women were divided into two groups. The first cohort included the HIV-infected pregnant women who were eligible for HAART based on WHO criteria (at high risk of transmission); the second cohort included HIV-infected pregnant women who were not eligible for HAART and received sc-PMTCT (with low risk of transmission). The MTCT-Plus program was reviewed by the institutional review board (IRB) from Columbia University in 2000 (principal sponsor) and was not considered a research project but rather a demonstration program in the context of the ARV roll-out. Informed consent was not required by the Columbia IRB. Upon enrolment, all participants were screened for HAART eligibility, defined from August 2003 to December 2004 as: WHO clinical stage 4 irrespective of CD4 T cell count; WHO stage 2 or 3 and CD4 T cell count ≤ 350 cells/mm3; or CD4 T cell count 250 cells/mm3 [18]; from that time forward, women with WHO stage 2 and CD4 T cell count < 350 cells/mm3 were no longer considered eligible for HAART. Other criteria taken into account for deciding to initiate HAART were the absence of medical contraindications to HAART as well as major barriers to adherence. Pregnant women who met eligibility criteria initiated HAART as early as 24 wk of gestation according to the last menstruation date, usually with zidovudine (ZDV), lamivudine (3TC) and nevirapine (NVP). Treatment continued during labour and postnatally. Pregnant women who were not eligible for HAART received validated scARV prophylactic regimens, usually sc(ZDV+3TC) from 32 wk of gestation (until 3 d postpartum) and sdNVP in labour [9,19], or scZDV from 28 wk, or sdNVP alone, or both scZDV and sdNVP [4,7–9,20]. All infants received ZDV syrup for 7 d and sdNVP syrup on day 3 irrespective of the maternal drug regimen. Clinical classification using the WHO staging system was performed by the physicians at enrolment into the MTCT-Plus program and at each subsequent visit. Women either used breast milk substitutes if feasible and affordable following WHO guidelines [21] or were encouraged to practice exclusive breast-feeding for a maximum of 6 mo and initiate early weaning from 4 mo onwards. Caesarean section was only performed for emergencies. Baseline adherence and psycho-social assessments were done before initiation of HAART, and followed by weekly visits for 8 wk using a standardized checklist of clinical symptoms to detect side effects and ensure adherence. A more detailed clinical evaluation, including symptom review, physical examination, and review of medication adherence was conducted monthly following MTCT-Plus clinical guidelines [22]. Adherence was assessed by physicians or nurses on the basis of a self report consisting of the number of pills taken by the women during the last 7 d preceding each schedule visit (all, most, few, none). Severe adverse events were classified according to international guidelines [23]. All blood samples of pregnant women who agreed to test were screened on site for HIV antibodies according to a validated algorithm described elsewhere [24]. CD4 T cell count was measured upon enrolment and at intervals of 6 mo. Hepatic and renal functions were measured prior to HAART initiation; liver function tests were repeated 2 wk after treatment initiation and monthly throughout pregnancy for women on HAART. Additional laboratory evaluation was restricted to patients with clinical indications. Laboratory tests were done at a central reference laboratory (CeDReS, Abidjan) certified by regional and international quality assurance programs. The CD4 T cell count and percentage were measured in the antenatal period at the enrolment visit and thereafter every 6 mo after the initiation of the treatment using a dual-platform flow-cytometry technique with an automated blood cell counter (MaxM, Beckman Coulter, http://www.beckmancoulter.com/) for absolute lymphocyte count and a flow cytometer (FACScan, Becton Dickinson, http://www.bdbiosciences.com/) for measuring the percentage of CD4 T cells (CD4%). Absolute CD4 T cell count was then calculated multiplying the CD4% by the total lymphocyte count. The laboratory quality control procedures included: (i) daily internal controls for both the automated blood cell counter (Coulter 5C cell control, Beckman Coulter) and the flow cytometer (BD multi-check control, Becton Dickinson); (ii) participation in two international assurance quality programs (UK-NEKAS and QASI). Plasma HIV-RNA viral load (VL) testing for the early diagnosis of paediatric HIV infection was performed using a quantitative real-time RT-PCR technique targeted at the HIV-1 LTR gene as previously validated [25]. The quantification limit of this method was 300 copies/ml with 200 μl of plasma. All infants were tested at 4 wk of age, and if positive, confirmed with repeat VL testing at 6 wk. Infants with two positive tests were classified as infected peripartum. Infants with a negative VL test at 4 wk of age were classified as uninfected peripartum and were subsequently tested at 12 mo by rapid HIV antibody testing. If the antibody test at 12 mo was positive, we performed a second test for confirmation at 15 mo or later. The HIV infection status of the children who stopped follow-up just after being tested HIV antibody-positive at 12 mo or who had ceased breast-feeding under the age of 2 mo was confirmed by VL testing. HIV antibody-negative or VL-negative children were classified as uninfected. Postnatal transmission was defined as a negative HIV PCR from a first sample at age 30–180 d followed by a positive VL or antibody test at 12 or 15 mo. Group comparisons according to ARV regimens used Student t-test or nonparametric Mann-Whitney test for quantitative variables, and Chi2 test or Fisher exact test for qualitative variables. The first-live born child was used for analysis in the case of multiple births. Two survival analyses were conducted using two different outcomes in children: HIV infection or HIV-free survival (which is defined as ending at the occurrence of HIV infection or death, whichever came first). Cumulative transmission risks of HIV and (HIV or death) were estimated using both Turnbull method and Kaplan-Meier probabilities. As results were similar (unpublished data), Kaplan-Meier estimates were retained to allow for comparisons between groups using the log-rank test. For survival analysis, time to infection was estimated up to the first positive test for peripartum cases or to the midpoint date between the last negative test and the first positive test for the postnatal cases. Results were expressed in percentages with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Determinants of HIV infection and (HIV or death) were explored using a Cox model with the following variables: maternal age, ARV regimen, WHO staging, CD4 T cell count, haemoglobinemia, infant feeding practice from birth, birth weight, and child gender. A stepwise descendant multivariate analysis included all variables with p < 0.25 in the univariate analysis. Statistical analyses were processed with Stata software, version 9.0 (Stata, http://www.stata.com/).

The innovation described in the study is a two-tiered approach to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) in resource-limited settings. The first tier involves providing highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) to HIV-infected pregnant women who meet the eligibility criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO). The second tier involves providing short-course antiretroviral (scARV) PMTCT regimens to women with less advanced HIV disease. This approach was evaluated for its short-term (4 weeks) and long-term (12 months) effectiveness in preventing HIV transmission from mother to child. The study found that the two-tiered strategy was safe and highly effective for PMTCT in resource-constrained settings, with a low rate of peripartum HIV transmission and a high rate of HIV-free survival for infants.
AI Innovations Description
The recommendation described in the study is a two-tiered approach to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) in resource-limited settings. The first tier involves providing highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) to HIV-infected pregnant women who meet the eligibility criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO). The second tier involves providing short-course antiretroviral (scARV) PMTCT regimens to women with less advanced HIV disease.

The study evaluated the effectiveness of this two-tiered strategy in West Africa, specifically in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire. The results showed that the overall rate of peripartum HIV transmission was 2.2% and the cumulative rate at 12 months was 5.7%. The overall probability of infant death or HIV infection was 4.3% at 4 weeks and 11.7% at 12 months.

This recommendation can be developed into an innovation to improve access to maternal health by implementing a comprehensive PMTCT program that includes both HAART and scARV regimens. This program should be family-centered and provide holistic HIV care and treatment to pregnant and postpartum women, their partners, and their children. It should also include regular screening for HIV infection, CD4 T cell count measurement, and viral load testing to diagnose peripartum infection in infants.

To ensure the success of this innovation, it is important to establish partnerships with local healthcare providers, community organizations, and government agencies. Training and capacity-building programs should be implemented to ensure healthcare providers have the necessary skills and knowledge to deliver comprehensive PMTCT services. Additionally, efforts should be made to address barriers to adherence, provide psychosocial support to pregnant women, and promote breastfeeding practices that align with WHO guidelines.

By implementing this innovative approach, access to maternal health can be improved, and the transmission of HIV from mother to child can be significantly reduced in resource-limited settings.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the information provided, the study evaluated the effectiveness of a two-tiered approach to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) in West Africa. The first tier involved providing highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) to HIV-infected pregnant women who met the eligibility criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO). The second tier involved providing short-course antiretroviral (scARV) PMTCT regimens to women with less advanced HIV disease. The study followed the enrolled women and their infants to determine the rate of HIV transmission and HIV-free survival.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could be developed using the following steps:

1. Define the population: Identify the target population for the simulation, such as HIV-infected pregnant women in resource-limited settings.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather data on the current access to maternal health services, including the availability of HAART and scARV PMTCT regimens, the number of women receiving these treatments, and the rate of HIV transmission.

3. Develop a simulation model: Create a mathematical model that represents the population and the factors influencing access to maternal health. The model should consider variables such as the number of women eligible for HAART, the availability of healthcare facilities, the capacity to provide HAART and scARV PMTCT regimens, and the rate of HIV transmission.

4. Define intervention scenarios: Design different scenarios that represent potential innovations to improve access to maternal health. For example, scenarios could include increasing the availability of HAART, expanding healthcare facilities, or implementing new strategies for HIV testing and treatment.

5. Simulate the impact: Run the simulation model using the baseline data and the defined intervention scenarios. The model should calculate the projected outcomes, such as the reduction in HIV transmission rates, the increase in HIV-free survival rates, and the number of women accessing maternal health services.

6. Analyze the results: Evaluate the outcomes of the simulation to determine the effectiveness of each intervention scenario. Compare the results to identify the most impactful innovations for improving access to maternal health.

7. Refine and validate the model: Review the simulation model and its assumptions to ensure accuracy and reliability. Validate the model by comparing the simulated outcomes with real-world data, if available.

By following this methodology, policymakers and healthcare providers can gain insights into the potential impact of different innovations on improving access to maternal health. This information can guide decision-making and resource allocation to prioritize interventions that have the greatest potential for positive outcomes.

Partagez ceci :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email