Comparative models of biological and social pathways to predict child growth through age 2 years from birth cohorts in Brazil, India, the Philippines, and South Africa

listen audio

Study Justification:
– Early growth faltering is a significant contributor to child deaths and has long-term negative effects on the health and human capital of surviving children.
– Both biological and social factors influence growth faltering, but their relative strength and interrelations in different contexts are not well understood.
– This study aims to explore the social and biological determinants of child height at age 2 in low- and middle-income countries using structural equation modeling.
Highlights:
– The study analyzed data from 4 birth cohort studies in Brazil, India, the Philippines, and South Africa, with a total of 13,824 participants.
– Maternal height and birthweight were found to strongly predict child height at age 2 in all 4 sites.
– Three social-environmental factors, including “child circumstances,” “family socioeconomic status,” and “community facilities,” were identified as predictors of child height.
– The biological pathways accounted for 59% of the explained variance in child height, while the social-environmental pathways accounted for 41%.
– The study highlights the importance of addressing both biological and social determinants of child growth through interventions.
Recommendations:
– Interventions should focus on improving maternal height, as it strongly influences child height at age 2.
– Concurrent social factors, such as child circumstances, family socioeconomic status, and community facilities, should be targeted to promote optimal child growth.
– Long-term interventions should address both biological and social determinants to ensure healthy child growth.
Key Role Players:
– Researchers and scientists specializing in child growth and development.
– Health professionals, including doctors, nurses, and nutritionists.
– Policy makers and government officials responsible for implementing interventions.
– Community leaders and organizations involved in promoting child health and well-being.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Research and data collection costs, including participant recruitment, data management, and analysis.
– Intervention development and implementation costs, such as training programs, educational materials, and monitoring systems.
– Healthcare and nutrition services, including prenatal care, child health check-ups, and access to nutritious food.
– Infrastructure improvements, such as improving community facilities and sanitation.
– Public awareness campaigns and communication strategies to promote the importance of child growth and the interventions being implemented.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong, as it is based on data from 13,824 participants in birth cohort studies in Brazil, India, the Philippines, and South Africa. The study used exploratory structural equation models and path analysis to estimate relations among a wide set of social and biological variables. The study found that both biological and social factors contribute to early child growth faltering, with maternal height and birthweight being strongly predictive of height-for-age at 24 months in all four sites. The study also identified three social-environmental factors that were strongly predictive of height-for-age at 24 months. The study highlights opportunities for interventions that address both biological and social determinants of child growth. To improve the evidence, future studies could consider including additional birth cohort studies from other low- and middle-income countries to further validate the findings.

Background: Early growth faltering accounts for one-third of child deaths, and adversely impacts the health and human capital of surviving children. Social as well as biological factors contribute to growth faltering, but their relative strength and interrelations in different contexts have not been fully described. Objective: The aim of this study was to use structural equation modelling to explore social and biological multidetermination of child height at age 2 y in longitudinal data from 4 birth cohort studies in low- and middle-income countries. Methods: We analyzed data from 13,824 participants in birth cohort studies in Brazil, India, the Philippines, and South Africa. We used exploratory structural equation models, with height-for-age at 24 mo as the outcome to derive factors, and path analysis to estimate relations among a wide set of social and biological variables common to the 4 sites. Results: The prevalence of stunting at 24 mo ranged from 14.0% in Brazil to 67.7% in the Philippines. Maternal height and birthweight were strongly predictive of height-for-age at 24 mo in all 4 sites (all P values <0.001). Three social-environmental factors, which we characterized as "child circumstances," "family socioeconomic status," and "community facilities," were identified in all sites. Each social-environmental factor was also strongly predictive of height-for-age at 24 mo (all P values 99% of all births in the city. The Indian cohort enrolled 8181 babies born to married, mostly middle-class, women in a defined area of New Delhi between 1969 and 1972. The Philippine cohort enrolled pregnant women from all socioeconomic groups living in 33 randomly selected, mostly urban (75%) neighborhoods in Cebu between 1983 and 1984 (3080 infants). The South African cohort enrolled mostly poor black pregnant women living in a defined urban area of Johannesburg in 1990 (3273 infants). All the studies were reviewed and approved by an appropriate ethics committee or institutional review board. Birthweight was measured in grams in hospitals and clinics at delivery in Brazil and South Africa, in hospitals or at home by birth attendants in the Philippines, and in the community within 72 h of birth in India. Maternal height was measured by a stadiometer and recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm following standard procedures at cohort enrolment in Brazil and the Philippines, and at birth or in early childhood in India and South Africa. Height-for-age was measured at around 24 mo of age, with some variability among sites. In all cohorts, measurements were converted to height-for-age z scores with reference to WHO standards and with the use of children’s exact age at measurement (28). The specific social factors used in this analysis were selected based on their commonality across the 4 birth cohort sites and their prior identification as determinants of height in childhood (29). They include maternal and paternal schooling, maternal age at the birth of the child, marital status, wealth (an index calculated from a list of pertinent assets), annual income (per capita), social class (paternal occupation), household crowding (ratio of people per room), sex, birth order, child dependency (ratio of children aged 20 times larger than the number of parameters being estimated, reducing the chances of substantial model overfit to data (31). Missing data were accommodated by full information maximum likelihood, which returns unbiased parameter estimates when data are missing at random, conditional on the variables included in the model (32, 33). Fit statistics are reported for RMSEA, CFI, and TLI. All analyses were conducted with SPSS (version 21, IBM Corporation) and Mplus (version 7.1, Muthén & Muthén).

Based on the provided information, here are some potential innovations that could be used to improve access to maternal health:

1. Telemedicine: Implementing telemedicine services can provide remote access to healthcare professionals, allowing pregnant women to receive prenatal care and consultations without having to travel long distances.

2. Mobile health applications: Developing mobile applications that provide information and resources on maternal health, such as nutrition guidelines, prenatal exercises, and appointment reminders, can help women access important information and track their own health during pregnancy.

3. Community health workers: Training and deploying community health workers who can provide basic prenatal care, education, and support to pregnant women in underserved areas can improve access to maternal health services, especially in remote or rural communities.

4. Maternal health clinics: Establishing dedicated maternal health clinics in areas with limited healthcare infrastructure can provide comprehensive prenatal care, including regular check-ups, screenings, and vaccinations, to ensure the well-being of pregnant women and their babies.

5. Mobile clinics: Utilizing mobile clinics that can travel to remote or underserved areas to provide prenatal care and health services to pregnant women who may not have access to traditional healthcare facilities.

6. Public-private partnerships: Collaborating with private healthcare providers and organizations to expand access to maternal health services, such as offering subsidized or low-cost prenatal care and delivery services, can help reach more women in need.

7. Health education programs: Implementing community-based health education programs that focus on maternal health, including topics such as nutrition, hygiene, and prenatal care, can empower women with knowledge and promote healthy practices during pregnancy.

8. Maternity waiting homes: Establishing maternity waiting homes near healthcare facilities can provide a safe and comfortable place for pregnant women to stay during the final weeks of pregnancy, ensuring they are close to medical care when labor begins.

9. Transportation support: Providing transportation support, such as vouchers or shuttle services, to pregnant women who have difficulty accessing healthcare facilities can help overcome geographical barriers and ensure timely access to maternal health services.

10. Financial incentives: Introducing financial incentives, such as conditional cash transfers or maternity benefits, can encourage pregnant women to seek and utilize maternal health services, reducing financial barriers to access.

These innovations can help improve access to maternal health services, reduce maternal and infant mortality rates, and promote better health outcomes for both mothers and babies.
AI Innovations Description
The recommendation that can be used to develop an innovation to improve access to maternal health based on the provided description is to implement interventions that address both biological and social determinants of early child growth faltering. This recommendation is supported by the findings of the study, which highlight the importance of both maternal height (a biological factor) and social-environmental factors in determining child height at age 2.

Specifically, the study suggests that interventions should focus on improving maternal height, as it strongly influences child height at 2 years. This can be achieved through interventions that address intergenerational deprivation and improve overall maternal health and nutrition. Additionally, the study identifies three social-environmental factors (“child circumstances,” “family socioeconomic status,” and “community facilities”) that are also strongly predictive of child height at 2 years. These factors can be targeted through interventions that aim to improve access to healthcare, education, sanitation, and safe water, among others.

By addressing both biological and social determinants of child growth, interventions can have a comprehensive impact on improving access to maternal health and reducing early growth faltering. It is important to consider the specific contexts and variations in social factors across different low- and middle-income countries when designing and implementing these interventions.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided description, here are some potential recommendations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Strengthen healthcare infrastructure: Invest in improving healthcare facilities, including hospitals, clinics, and maternal health centers, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This would ensure that pregnant women have access to quality healthcare services during pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum.

2. Increase availability of skilled healthcare providers: Train and deploy more skilled healthcare providers, such as doctors, nurses, midwives, and community health workers, to areas with limited access to maternal healthcare. This would help ensure that pregnant women receive appropriate care and support throughout their pregnancy journey.

3. Enhance community-based interventions: Implement community-based interventions that focus on raising awareness about maternal health, promoting healthy behaviors during pregnancy, and providing support to pregnant women and new mothers. This could include educational programs, peer support groups, and home visits by trained healthcare workers.

4. Improve transportation and logistics: Address transportation barriers by improving road infrastructure, providing transportation subsidies or vouchers for pregnant women, and establishing emergency referral systems. This would help overcome geographical barriers and ensure timely access to healthcare facilities.

5. Strengthen health information systems: Develop and implement robust health information systems to collect, analyze, and disseminate data on maternal health indicators. This would enable policymakers and healthcare providers to make evidence-based decisions and monitor progress towards improving maternal health outcomes.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Define the target population: Identify the specific population group or geographic area that would benefit from the recommended interventions. This could be based on factors such as socioeconomic status, geographical location, or existing disparities in maternal health outcomes.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather relevant data on maternal health indicators, such as maternal mortality rates, access to antenatal care, skilled birth attendance, and postpartum care. This data will serve as a baseline for comparison before implementing the recommendations.

3. Develop a simulation model: Create a simulation model that incorporates the recommended interventions and their potential impact on maternal health outcomes. This model should consider factors such as population size, healthcare infrastructure, availability of skilled healthcare providers, and transportation logistics.

4. Input data and parameters: Input the baseline data and relevant parameters into the simulation model. This includes information on the target population, current healthcare resources, and expected changes resulting from the recommended interventions.

5. Run simulations: Run multiple simulations using the model to assess the potential impact of the recommended interventions on maternal health outcomes. This could involve varying parameters, such as the scale of intervention implementation or the coverage of healthcare services.

6. Analyze results: Analyze the simulation results to determine the projected changes in maternal health indicators, such as reductions in maternal mortality rates, improvements in access to antenatal care, or increased utilization of skilled birth attendance. Compare these results to the baseline data to assess the effectiveness of the recommended interventions.

7. Refine and iterate: Based on the simulation results, refine the interventions and parameters as necessary. Repeat the simulation process to further optimize the recommendations and assess their potential impact on improving access to maternal health.

It is important to note that simulation models provide estimates and projections based on assumptions and available data. The accuracy of the results depends on the quality of the data and the validity of the assumptions made in the model. Therefore, it is crucial to continuously update and validate the model as new data becomes available.

Partagez ceci :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email