Feasibility and Safety of Cervical Biopsy Sampling for Mucosal Immune Studies in Female Sex Workers from Nairobi, Kenya

listen audio

Study Justification:
– The study aims to improve understanding of the mucosal immuno-pathogenesis of HIV acquisition in the female genital tract, specifically in high-risk women such as female sex workers (FSWs).
– Cervical biopsy samples offer technical advantages over cytobrush sampling, but concerns exist regarding potential increased HIV acquisition if healing is slow and/or women do not abstain from sex during healing.
Highlights:
– Cervical biopsy sampling was found to be safe and well-tolerated in this context, particularly if participants with vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) are excluded.
– Healing of the biopsy site was observed in 82% of participants within 5 days.
– High levels of compliance with pre- and post-procedure abstinence were reported based on self-report and prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening.
– At six-month follow-up, all low-risk and HIV-exposed seronegative (HESN) participants remained HIV seronegative.
Recommendations:
– Support a period of post-procedure abstinence to minimize HIV risk, both financially and with rigorous counseling.
– Exclude participants with VVC from cervical biopsy sampling to avoid potential complications.
Key Role Players:
– Researchers and scientists involved in mucosal immuno-pathogenesis studies
– Healthcare professionals and clinicians specializing in HIV and reproductive health
– Ethical committees and regulatory bodies overseeing research and participant consent
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Financial support for counseling services related to post-procedure abstinence
– Compensation for female sex workers equivalent to expected lost income during the study period
– Funding for HIV/STI prevention counseling, male and female condoms, family planning services, and treatment of STIs
– Resources for diagnostic testing and referral for specialist consultation and hospitalization if needed
– Budget for research staff, equipment, and supplies related to cervical biopsy sampling and immune studies

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is moderately strong. The study collected cervical biopsy samples and cervico-vaginal swabs from 59 women, including HIV seropositive and HIV-exposed seronegative female sex workers (FSWs) as well as lower risk women from Nairobi, Kenya. The study found that cervical biopsy sampling is a safe and well-tolerated method to obtain cervical biopsies in this context, particularly if participants with vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) are excluded. However, the evidence could be strengthened by including a larger sample size and conducting a randomized controlled trial to compare the outcomes of cervical biopsy sampling with other sampling methods. Additionally, the study should consider including a longer follow-up period to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of cervical biopsy sampling.

Background: There is an urgent need to improve our understanding of the mucosal immuno-pathogenesis of HIV acquisition in the female genital tract, particularly in high-risk women such as female sex workers (FSWs). Cervical biopsy samples offer technical advantages over cytobrush sampling, but there are concerns that this might increase HIV acquisition, particularly if healing is slow and/or women do not abstain from sex during healing. Methodology/Principal Findings: Cervical biopsy samples and cervico-vaginal swabs for co-infection diagnostics, prostate specific antigen (PSA) and immune studies were collected from 59 women, including HIV seropositive and HIV-exposed seronegative (HESN) FSWs as well as lower risk women from Nairobi, Kenya. A clinical-demographic questionnaire was administered and women were instructed to avoid sexual intercourse, douching and the insertion of tampons for 14 days. All participants underwent a repeat exam to assess healing within the 14 days, and had HIV diagnostics at six months. Cervical sampling was well tolerated, and 82% of participants had healed macroscopically by 5 days. Both self-report and PSA screening suggested high levels of compliance with pre- and post-procedure abstinence. Delayed healing was associated with vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) and HESN status. At six-month follow up all low-risk and HESN participants remained HIV seronegative. Conclusion: Cervical biopsy sampling is a safe and well-tolerated method to obtain cervical biopsies in this context, particularly if participants with VVC are excluded. As healing could be delayed up to 11 days, it is important to support (both financially and with rigorous counseling) a period of post-procedure abstinence to minimize HIV risk. © 2012 Hasselrot et al.

The study was reviewed and approved by the regional ethical boards at Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya; the Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; and the University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. All ethical committees approved the consent procedure. HIV-uninfected and infected FSW participants were recruited at the Majengo Sex Worker Clinic [3] and HIV-uninfected lower risk controls were recruited at a Maternal Health Clinic based at the Pumwani Maternity Hospital [11]. Inclusion criteria were: (1) age >18 years; (2) uterus and cervix present; (3) willingness to undergo pelvic exams and ectocervical biopsies; (4) willingness to abstain from vaginal sex for 15 days as part of the study; (5) antiretroviral treatment (ART) naïve and (6) general good health. Exclusion criteria were: (1) pregnancy; and (2) active menstruation. All HIV-uninfected female sex workers were currently active in sex work and had been enrolled in the Majengo Clinic for at least three years; thereby meeting previously published epidemiologic criteria for relative HIV resistance [3]. All lower risk individuals enrolled reported no history of sex work and only one sexual partner for the last 6 months. The detected HIV viral load in the HIV-infected women was 20–64800 copies/mL (median: 11735 copies/mL) and the CD4 count ranged 121–1737 cells/µL (median: 493 cells/µL). Cervical biopsies were collected using a protocol previously shown to be safe and well-tolerated in Swedish participants at low risk of HIV exposure [12]. An external and internal genital exam was performed and cervicovaginal secretions (CVS) were collected from all women by rotating one cotton-tipped swab 360° in the cervical os, and one swab to collect secretions from the posterior vaginal fornix. Both swabs were transferred into a vial containing 5 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).Next, cervical cells were collected by rotating one cytobrush 360° in the cervical os and two ectocervical biopsies (3 mm2) from the superior portion of the ectocervix were collected with Schubert biopsy forceps (B. Braun Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany). A polycresulin gel was applied after sampling to induce vasoconstriction and subsequent homeostasis and all participants were observed for up to one hour to ensure that no active bleeding occurred prior to clinic discharge. Data regarding demographical, reproductive, sexual and clinical characteristics were collected using a questionnaire. All participants were provided with both written and verbal information about the potential for cervical biopsy to increase the risk of HIV acquisition and/or transmission, this information was repeated at two separate clinic visits prior to enrolment. Participants were asked to abstain from unprotected vaginal sex for a period of one day prior to the procedure and to refrain from any vaginal sex, vaginal douching or tampon insertion for fourteen days after the procedure. Since the study protocol precluded income from sex work, FSW participants received monetary compensation equivalent to the expected lost income; lower risk controls received the same compensation. Genital infection diagnostics included: HIV (Chiron, Emeryville, CA, USA) and Herpes Simplex Virus type 2 (HSV2) serology (HerpeSelect® 1 and 2 Immunoblot IgG, Focus Diagnostics, CA, USA); urine for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (Amplicor PCR Diagnostics, Roche Diagnostics, Quebec, Canada); syphilis serology (Macro-Vue Rapid Plasma Reagin test, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA); Gram stain for bacterial vaginosis (BV; defined as a Nugent score of 7 to 10) and lactobacillus colonization and vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) (defined as the Gram stain finding of any lactobacilli or yeast, respectively). All participants were provided with HIV/STI prevention counseling, male and female condoms, family planning services, treatment of STIs, medical care for acute and chronic illnesses, access to adequate diagnostic testing and referral for specialist consultant and/or hospitalization at Kenyatta National Hospital if needed. Study participants were asked to return for clinical follow-up 3–5 days post-procedure; those who were actively menstruating were requested to come back as soon as menses had ceased. Participants were clinically evaluated and asked about any bleeding or discomfort, and whether they had had vaginal sex since the procedure. A gynecological exam was performed, including clinical assessment of biopsy healing. The biopsy site was considered as healed when no bleeding from biopsy site, no hyperemia and no abnormalities were detected during the macroscopic evaluation. Vaginal lavages (VagL) were collected by gently aspirating 2 mL of PBS without getting in contact with the cervix. Participants were again informed of the importance of sexual abstinence for a full two weeks post-procedure. PSA levels in enrolment CVS and follow up VagL were assayed using a Chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (ARCHITECT Instrument, Abbott Laboratories, IL, USA) as a marker of recent unprotected sex [13]. Univariate analyses were performed using Fisher’s exact test when comparing categorical variables, and non-parametric Mann-Whitney test when comparing continuous variables. Forward conditional binary logistic regression analyses were performed with healing status of biopsy site as the dependent variable and all variables associated with non-healing of the biopsy site in univariate analysis as covariates. P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Software products used were Prism 5.00 (GraphPad Software Inc, CA, USA) for Windows and PASW Statistics 18 (SPSS/IBM Corporation, NY, USA).

Based on the information provided, it seems that the study focused on the feasibility and safety of cervical biopsy sampling for mucosal immune studies in female sex workers from Nairobi, Kenya. The study found that cervical biopsy sampling was well tolerated and safe in this context, with 82% of participants healing within 5 days. Compliance with pre- and post-procedure abstinence was high, as indicated by self-report and prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening. The study also highlighted the importance of supporting a period of post-procedure abstinence to minimize HIV risk.

In terms of potential innovations to improve access to maternal health, here are a few recommendations based on the study:

1. Mobile Clinics: Implementing mobile clinics that can provide cervical biopsy sampling and other maternal health services to remote or underserved areas. This would help improve access to these services for women who may not have easy access to healthcare facilities.

2. Telemedicine: Utilizing telemedicine technologies to remotely connect healthcare providers with women who need cervical biopsy sampling. This would allow for consultations and guidance to be provided without the need for women to travel long distances.

3. Community Health Workers: Training and empowering community health workers to perform cervical biopsy sampling and provide basic maternal health services. This would help bridge the gap between healthcare facilities and communities, making these services more accessible to women.

4. Education and Awareness: Increasing education and awareness about the importance of cervical biopsy sampling and other maternal health services. This could be done through community outreach programs, workshops, and campaigns to ensure that women are informed about these services and understand their benefits.

5. Integration of Services: Integrating cervical biopsy sampling and other maternal health services into existing healthcare programs or facilities. This would help ensure that women have access to these services during routine check-ups or visits for other healthcare needs.

It’s important to note that these recommendations are based on the information provided and may need to be further evaluated and tailored to the specific context and needs of the population.
AI Innovations Description
The study mentioned in the description focuses on improving our understanding of the mucosal immuno-pathogenesis of HIV acquisition in the female genital tract, specifically in high-risk women such as female sex workers (FSWs). The study explores the feasibility and safety of cervical biopsy sampling for mucosal immune studies in FSWs from Nairobi, Kenya.

The study found that cervical biopsy sampling is a safe and well-tolerated method to obtain cervical biopsies in this context. The majority of participants had healed macroscopically within 5 days, and high levels of compliance with pre- and post-procedure abstinence were observed. Delayed healing was associated with vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) and HIV-exposed seronegative (HESN) status. At the six-month follow-up, all low-risk and HESN participants remained HIV seronegative.

Based on these findings, the recommendation to improve access to maternal health would be to consider implementing cervical biopsy sampling as a standard procedure for mucosal immune studies in high-risk women, such as FSWs. This would require providing financial support and rigorous counseling to ensure a period of post-procedure abstinence, minimizing the risk of HIV acquisition. By utilizing cervical biopsy sampling, researchers and healthcare providers can gain valuable insights into the mucosal immuno-pathogenesis of HIV acquisition, leading to potential innovations in maternal health interventions and strategies.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided information, it seems that the study is focused on evaluating the feasibility and safety of cervical biopsy sampling for mucosal immune studies in female sex workers from Nairobi, Kenya. The study aims to understand the mucosal immuno-pathogenesis of HIV acquisition in the female genital tract, particularly in high-risk women such as female sex workers.

To improve access to maternal health, it is important to consider innovations that can address the specific challenges faced by women in accessing maternal healthcare services. Here are a few potential recommendations:

1. Mobile Clinics: Implementing mobile clinics that can travel to remote or underserved areas, providing maternal health services directly to women who may not have easy access to healthcare facilities.

2. Telemedicine: Utilizing telemedicine technologies to connect pregnant women with healthcare providers remotely, allowing them to receive prenatal care and consultations without the need for physical travel.

3. Community Health Workers: Training and deploying community health workers who can provide basic maternal health services, education, and support to women in their own communities.

4. Maternal Health Vouchers: Introducing voucher programs that provide financial assistance to pregnant women, enabling them to access essential maternal health services at accredited healthcare facilities.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could be developed as follows:

1. Define the target population: Identify the specific group of women who would benefit from improved access to maternal health services, such as pregnant women in underserved areas or high-risk populations.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather information on the current state of maternal health access and outcomes in the target population, including factors such as distance to healthcare facilities, availability of services, and utilization rates.

3. Develop a simulation model: Create a mathematical or computational model that incorporates the relevant variables and factors influencing access to maternal health services. This model should consider the potential impact of the recommended innovations on improving access, such as increased utilization rates or reduced travel distances.

4. Input data and parameters: Input the collected baseline data into the simulation model, along with the parameters related to the recommended innovations (e.g., number of mobile clinics, coverage area, telemedicine availability, etc.).

5. Run simulations: Run the simulation model multiple times, varying the input parameters to explore different scenarios and assess the potential impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health.

6. Analyze results: Analyze the simulation results to evaluate the potential outcomes of implementing the recommended innovations. This could include measures such as increased utilization rates, reduced travel distances, improved health outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.

7. Refine and validate the model: Continuously refine and validate the simulation model based on real-world data and feedback from stakeholders. This will help ensure the accuracy and reliability of the model’s predictions.

By following this methodology, policymakers and healthcare providers can gain insights into the potential impact of different innovations on improving access to maternal health and make informed decisions on implementing the most effective strategies.

Partagez ceci :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email