Barriers and facilitators in the provision of post-abortion care at district level in central Uganda – A qualitative study focusing on task sharing between physicians and midwives

listen audio

Study Justification:
– Abortion is restricted in Uganda and poor access to contraceptive methods leads to unsafe abortions, contributing to maternal mortality and morbidity.
– The existing sexual and reproductive health policy in Uganda supports task sharing in post-abortion care as a pragmatic response to increased workload.
– This study aims to explore physicians’ and midwives’ perception of post-abortion care, professional competences, methods, contraceptive counseling, and task sharing in post-abortion care.
Highlights:
– Post-abortion care is necessary but controversial and sometimes difficult to provide.
– Midwives are the main providers of post-abortion care, but they often lack proper training.
– Task sharing is taking place, but providers lack the relevant skills for quality care.
– Further training in post-abortion care is needed.
– Post-abortion care should be included in the educational curricula of nurses and midwives.
– Scaling up task sharing and providing in-service training for doctors and midwives can improve the quality and accessibility of post-abortion care.
Recommendations:
– Scale up task sharing in post-abortion care.
– Provide in-service training for doctors and midwives in post-abortion care.
– Include post-abortion care in the educational curricula of nurses and midwives.
– Promote the use of misoprostol for uterine evacuation in post-abortion care.
Key Role Players:
– Health care providers (doctors, midwives, nurses, clinical officers)
– Medical officers or head nurses/midwives at health facilities
– Researchers with different cultural and professional backgrounds
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Training materials and resources for in-service training
– Development and integration of post-abortion care curriculum in nursing and midwifery education
– Procurement of misoprostol for uterine evacuation
– Monitoring and evaluation of task sharing implementation
– Research and data collection costs for ongoing assessment and improvement of post-abortion care services

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is based on a qualitative study using in-depth interviews with healthcare providers. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. The study was conducted at seven healthcare facilities in the Central Region of Uganda, which were purposely selected based on their high caseloads in post-abortion care. The study included both doctors and midwives, and explored their perceptions of post-abortion care, professional competences, methods, contraceptive counseling, and task sharing. The study identified the need for further training in post-abortion care and recommended scaling up task sharing and providing in-service training for both doctors and midwives. The evidence in the abstract is based on a specific context and may not be generalizable to other settings. To improve the strength of the evidence, future research could include a larger sample size and a more diverse range of healthcare facilities. Additionally, using a mixed methods approach could provide a more comprehensive understanding of post-abortion care in Uganda.

Background: Abortion is restricted in Uganda, and poor access to contraceptive methods result in unwanted pregnancies. This leaves women no other choice than unsafe abortion, thus placing a great burden on the Ugandan health system and making unsafe abortion one of the major contributors to maternal mortality and morbidity in Uganda. The existing sexual and reproductive health policy in Uganda supports the sharing of tasks in post-abortion care. This task sharing is taking place as a pragmatic response to the increased workload. This study aims to explore physicians’ and midwives’ perception of post-abortion care with regard to professional competences, methods, contraceptive counselling and task shifting/sharing in post-abortion care. Methods. In-depth interviews (n = 27) with health care providers of post-abortion care were conducted in seven health facilities in the Central Region of Uganda. The data were organized using thematic analysis with an inductive approach. Results: Post-abortion care was perceived as necessary, albeit controversial and sometimes difficult to provide. Together with poor conditions post-abortion care provoked frustration especially among midwives. Task sharing was generally taking place and midwives were identified as the main providers, although they would rarely have the proper training in post-abortion care. Additionally, midwives were sometimes forced to provide services outside their defined task area, due to the absence of doctors. Different uterine evacuation skills were recognized although few providers knew of misoprostol as a method for post-abortion care. An overall need for further training in post-abortion care was identified. Conclusions: Task sharing is taking place, but providers lack the relevant skills for the provision of quality care. For post-abortion care to improve, task sharing needs to be scaled up and in-service training for both doctors and midwives needs to be provided. Post-abortion care should further be included in the educational curricula of nurses and midwives. Scaled-up task sharing in post-abortion care, along with misoprostol use for uterine evacuation would provide a systematic approach to improving the quality of care and accessibility of services, with the aim of reducing abortion-related mortality and morbidity in Uganda. © 2014Paul et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

An inductive study approach using an emergent design was employed, utilizing the qualitative method of in-depth interviews (IDI). Thematic analysis was used to structure the data. The study was performed at seven health care facilities situated in five different districts in the Central Region of Uganda. The region was chosen because the abortion rate has been reported to be the second highest in the country, and it is above the national average (62 per 1000 women) [36]. The seven facilities were purposely selected because of their high caseloads in PAC. The caseloads were mapped through a survey done by one of the Ugandan researchers prior to the initiation of this study (2012). In addition, the employment of both doctors and midwives in a facility was regarded a criterion for inclusion, and we aimed to include facilities from rural, semi-urban and urban settings. The Ugandan health system is made up of a national referral hospital, regional and district hospitals, and health centres II-IV. Health centre IV is the most advanced, employing both doctors and midwives, and health centre II is the least advanced, employing a nurse or a clinical officer. Health centre I, also referred to as village health teams, are the lowest level and have no permanent accommodation [40]. A total of 27 IDI were carried out with health care providers in the health facilities listed above (Table 1). The majority of respondents (all the midwives and one doctor) were female (70%). The midwives had all worked for eight or more years, while the work experience of the doctors ranged between one and twenty years. The health facilities selected were staffed by doctors and midwives, and were equipped to provide basic and comprehensive emergency obstetric care in rural, semi-urban and urban areas. National, regional, district and sub-district levels were included (Table 1) to explore any discrepancies in service provision among the levels as well as differences between the cadres. Facilities included in data collection The table shows the location, setting and level of health facility as well as the number of study subjects participating in the IDI from each health facility, including the distribution between doctors and midwives. 1. Being employed in one of the hospitals/Health centres listed above (Table 1) 2. Being a nurse, a midwife, a clinical officer or a doctor 3. Actively participating in PAC The IDI were conducted in February and March 2012, and continued until no new data were encountered. Purposive sampling was employed. The person in charge at each health facility, such as the medical officer or head nurse/midwife, was used as a gatekeeper, facilitating the identification of eligible study subjects. All participants signed a written consent prior to the IDI, and the interviews were conducted in the hospital, meaning that interruptions could sometimes occur. Two pilot interviews were performed at Mulago hospital to test the interview guidelines, resulting in a revision to impart a better in-depth character to the questions. The final guideline was semi-structured, open-ended and utilized probes. Topics covered included (i) attitudes towards abortion, PAC and family planning, (ii) perceptions of methods for uterine evacuation, (iii) skills and competences needed and (iv) task sharing in PAC. The IDI were performed in English, lasted for 30–60 minutes and were tape-recorded. The research team consisted of researchers with different cultural and professional backgrounds. The first author and main researcher, a Swedish woman with a background in global health, and a Ugandan assistant, a woman with a degree in public health, conducted the data collection. All the researchers were involved in the analysis and interpretation of the data. The recorded data were transcribed verbatim, read through several times and carefully coded manually. Since little is known about the views and perceptions on PAC in Uganda, thematic analysis was used [41]. Furthermore, a thick description to reflect the content of the data was employed, and codes were organized into sub-themes using an inductive approach. Sub-themes were arranged into semantic themes focusing on identified patterns as well as on the broader meanings and implications of the data. The analysis was done with a realistic or epistemological approach, looking at experience and meaning in a straightforward way. The interpretation of the data was continuously discussed and re-evaluated by all researchers in the team. Additionally, the data were reviewed to identify extracts for illumination of the themes. Ethical approval was obtained from the Makerere University College of Health Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences Research and Ethics Committee, Kampala. National approval was given by the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology. The study was identified as a minimal risk study since it addressed health care providers’ perspective on a work task, and their opinions on abortion. A written consent form stated the rights of the participants, and confidentiality and the anonymity of the participants were guaranteed. The data and informed consent forms are stored safely under lock and key at Karolinska Institutet and are used only by the researchers involved in the study.

Based on the information provided, here are some potential innovations that could improve access to maternal health:

1. Task Sharing: Scaling up task sharing between physicians and midwives in post-abortion care could help alleviate the burden on healthcare providers and improve access to care. This could involve training midwives in post-abortion care and expanding their role in providing these services.

2. In-Service Training: Providing in-service training for both doctors and midwives in post-abortion care could enhance their skills and competencies, leading to the provision of higher quality care. This training could focus on topics such as professional competences, methods, contraceptive counseling, and task shifting/sharing.

3. Educational Curricula: Including post-abortion care in the educational curricula of nurses and midwives could ensure that future healthcare providers are equipped with the necessary knowledge and skills to provide comprehensive care to women seeking post-abortion services.

4. Misoprostol Use: Increasing awareness and knowledge among healthcare providers about the use of misoprostol as a method for uterine evacuation in post-abortion care could provide a more systematic approach to improving the quality of care and accessibility of services.

By implementing these innovations, it is hoped that the quality of post-abortion care will improve, leading to a reduction in abortion-related mortality and morbidity in Uganda.
AI Innovations Description
The study titled “Barriers and facilitators in the provision of post-abortion care at district level in central Uganda – A qualitative study focusing on task sharing between physicians and midwives” aimed to explore physicians’ and midwives’ perception of post-abortion care in Uganda and identify barriers and facilitators in the provision of quality care.

The study used an inductive approach and conducted in-depth interviews with healthcare providers of post-abortion care in seven health facilities in the Central Region of Uganda. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.

The findings of the study revealed that post-abortion care was perceived as necessary but controversial and sometimes difficult to provide. Midwives were identified as the main providers of post-abortion care, although they often lacked proper training in this area. Task sharing between physicians and midwives was taking place, but providers lacked the relevant skills for the provision of quality care. The study also highlighted the need for further training in post-abortion care and the inclusion of post-abortion care in the educational curricula of nurses and midwives.

Based on these findings, the study recommended scaling up task sharing in post-abortion care and providing in-service training for both doctors and midwives. It also suggested including post-abortion care in the educational curricula of nurses and midwives. Additionally, the study proposed the use of misoprostol for uterine evacuation as a method to improve the quality of care and accessibility of services, with the aim of reducing abortion-related mortality and morbidity in Uganda.

Overall, the study provided valuable insights into the barriers and facilitators in the provision of post-abortion care in Uganda and offered recommendations for developing innovations to improve access to maternal health.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided description, here are some potential recommendations for improving access to maternal health:

1. Increase access to contraceptive methods: Implement programs that focus on increasing access to and awareness of contraceptive methods to prevent unwanted pregnancies and reduce the need for unsafe abortions.

2. Expand task sharing in post-abortion care: Scale up the practice of task sharing between physicians and midwives in post-abortion care. This can help alleviate the burden on physicians and ensure that women receive timely and appropriate care.

3. Provide in-service training for healthcare providers: Offer training programs for both doctors and midwives to enhance their skills and competencies in post-abortion care. This can improve the quality of care provided and ensure that healthcare providers have the necessary knowledge and skills to handle post-abortion cases.

4. Include post-abortion care in educational curricula: Incorporate post-abortion care into the educational curricula of nurses and midwives. This can help ensure that future healthcare providers are equipped with the necessary knowledge and skills to provide comprehensive post-abortion care.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could be developed using the following steps:

1. Define the indicators: Identify specific indicators that can measure the impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. For example, indicators could include the number of women receiving post-abortion care, the availability of contraceptive methods, and the competency levels of healthcare providers in post-abortion care.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather data on the current state of access to maternal health, including the number of women receiving post-abortion care, the availability of contraceptive methods, and the competency levels of healthcare providers. This will serve as a baseline for comparison.

3. Implement the recommendations: Put the recommendations into action, such as implementing programs to increase access to contraceptive methods, scaling up task sharing in post-abortion care, providing in-service training for healthcare providers, and incorporating post-abortion care into educational curricula.

4. Monitor and evaluate: Continuously monitor and evaluate the implementation of the recommendations. Collect data on the indicators identified in step 1 to measure the impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health.

5. Analyze the data: Analyze the data collected to assess the impact of the recommendations. Compare the baseline data with the data collected after the implementation of the recommendations to determine if there have been improvements in access to maternal health.

6. Draw conclusions and make recommendations: Based on the analysis of the data, draw conclusions about the effectiveness of the recommendations in improving access to maternal health. Make recommendations for further improvements or adjustments to the interventions based on the findings.

By following this methodology, it is possible to simulate the impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health and make informed decisions on how to best address the barriers and facilitators identified in the study.

Partagez ceci :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email