Effect of anti-malarial interventions on trends of malaria cases, hospital admissions and deaths, 2005-2015, Ghana

listen audio

Study Justification:
The study aimed to assess the impact of anti-malarial interventions, specifically the use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), on trends of malaria cases, hospital admissions, and deaths in Ghana from 2005 to 2015. The study was conducted to provide evidence on the effectiveness of these interventions and to guide future malaria control strategies in the country.
Highlights:
– The study found that the number of outpatient malaria cases declined by 57% during the post-scale-up period (2011-2015) compared to the pre-scale-up period (2005-2010).
– Microscopically confirmed malaria cases decreased by 53%, while the test positivity rate (TPR) decreased by 41%.
– Malaria deaths fell significantly by 65%, with a stronger decline observed in children under 5 years old.
– The study demonstrated that the use of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) in mass campaigns targeting all ages since 2011 had a significant impact on reducing malaria cases and deaths.
– The decline in malaria deaths occurred despite an increase in hospital admissions due to free access to hospitalization through the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS).
Recommendations:
– Sustained coverage of effective interventions, such as ACT and ITNs, is crucial for malaria control in Ghana.
– Strengthened surveillance systems are needed to monitor the progress of these interventions and to detect any potential resurgence of malaria cases.
– Continued investment in LLIN mass campaigns and indoor residual spraying (IRS) programs is recommended to maintain the gains achieved in reducing malaria cases and deaths.
– Efforts should be made to improve the coverage and sustainability of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) to ensure access to healthcare services for all.
Key Role Players:
– Government of Ghana
– Ministry of Health
– National Malaria Control Program
– District Health Authorities
– Health Facilities and Hospitals
– Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs) working on malaria control
– Community Health Workers
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Procurement and distribution of ACT and ITNs
– Conducting LLIN mass campaigns
– Implementation of indoor residual spraying (IRS) programs
– Training and capacity building for healthcare workers
– Surveillance systems and data management
– Health education and community mobilization activities
– Monitoring and evaluation of interventions
– Research and development for new anti-malarial interventions
Please note that the cost items provided are general categories and not actual cost estimates. The actual cost will depend on various factors such as the scale of interventions, geographical coverage, and specific implementation strategies.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong, as it presents a comprehensive analysis of the impact of anti-malarial interventions in Ghana. The study uses data from district hospitals and household surveys to assess the changes in malaria cases, admissions, and deaths. The analysis includes segmented log-linear regression to compare trends before and after the scale-up of interventions. The study also considers other factors such as test positivity rate, non-malaria cases, and deaths. To improve the evidence, the abstract could provide more details on the methodology used, such as the sample size and statistical significance of the findings.

Background: Since 2005, the Government of Ghana and its partners, in concerted efforts to control malaria, scaled up the use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). Beginning in 2011, a mass campaign of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) was implemented, targeting all the population. The impact of these interventions on malaria cases, admissions and deaths was assessed using data from district hospitals. Methods: Records of malaria cases and deaths and availability of ACT in 88 hospitals, as well as at district level, ITN distribution, and indoor residual spraying were reviewed. Annual proportion of the population potentially protected by ITNs was estimated with the assumption that each LLIN covered 1.8 persons for 3 years. Changes in trends of cases and deaths in 2015 were estimated by segmented log-linear regression, comparing trends in post-scale-up (2011-2015) with that of pre-scale-up (2005-2010) period. Trends of mortality in children under 5 years old from population-based household surveys were also compared with the trends observed in hospitals for the same time period. Results: Among all ages, the number of outpatient malaria cases (confirmed and presumed) declined by 57% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47-66%) by first half of 2015 (during the post-scale-up) compared to the pre-scale-up (2005-2010) period. The number of microscopically confirmed cases decreased by 53% (28-69%) while microscopic testing was stable. Test positivity rate (TPR) decreased by 41% (19-57%). The change in malaria admissions was insignificant while malaria deaths fell significantly by 65% (52-75%). In children under 5 years old, total malaria outpatient cases, admissions and deaths decreased by 50% (32-63%), 46% (19-75%) and 70% (49-82%), respectively. The proportion of outpatient malaria cases, admissions and deaths of all-cause conditions in both all ages and children under five also fell significantly by >30%. Similar decreases in the main malaria indicators were observed in the three epidemiological strata (coastal, forest, savannah). All-cause admissions increased significantly in patients covered by the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) compared to the non-insured. The non-malaria cases and non-malaria deaths increased or remained unchanged during the same period. All-cause mortality for children under 5 years old in household surveys, similar to those observed in the hospitals, declined by 43% between 2008 and 2014. Conclusions: The data provide compelling evidence of impact following LLIN mass campaigns targeting all ages since 2011, while maintaining other anti-malarial interventions. Malaria cases and deaths decreased by over 50 and 65%, respectively. The declines were stronger in children under five. Test positivity rate in all ages decreased by >40%. The decrease in malaria deaths was against a backdrop of increased admissions owing to free access to hospitalization through the NHIS. The study demonstrated that retrospective health facility-based data minimize reporting biases to assess effect of interventions. Malaria control in Ghana is dependent on sustained coverage of effective interventions and strengthened surveillance is vital to monitor progress of these investments.

Routine distribution of ITNs targeting children under 5 years old and pregnant women started in 2003 in 20 pilot districts and was scaled up nationwide during 2004–2010. During 2006–2009, >4.5 million ITNs were distributed through antenatal care (ANC), Child Health weeks, voucher schemes, and commercial sources. However, the strategy was replaced with a long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) mass campaign, starting at the end of 2010 with the goal of achieving universal coverage in all ages at a ratio of one net per two persons. During 2010–2012, >12 million LLINs were delivered, and another 12.3 million LLINs during 2013–2015. In 2012, the AngloGold Ashanti Malaria Control Programme (AGAMal) implemented indoor residual spraying (IRS) in seven districts, expanding to 22 districts in five regions (Upper West, Upper East, Ashanti, Western, Central) in 2015. PMI supported five districts for IRS in the Northern region. In total, in 2015, 4.7% of the entire population in the country benefited from IRS. This population also received LLINs. Parasitological testing of patients of age 5 years and above was primarily limited to hospitals. Since 2010, confirmation of all ages with either microscopy or rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) has been introduced. Health centres and health posts use RDTs as primary diagnostic tool while higher facilities use microscopy, reserving RDTs for emergency cases, and for situations where microscopy is not functional or caseloads exceed microscopy diagnostic capacity. Therefore, only records of microscopic testing from the hospitals were used for this study. The country changed its first-line anti-malarial treatment from chloroquine to artesunate–amodiaquine (AS–AQ) in 2004 and added artemether–lumefantrine (AL) and dihydro-artemisinin–piperaquine (DHAP) as alternatives in 2009. Quinine was the principal medicine for severe malaria until 2010, when injectable artesunate was adopted as the drug of choice. The Affordable Medicines facility for Malaria (AMFm), launched in 2011, increased access to ACT in the private sector from 31% in 2010 to 83% in 2011 [3]. For community-based intervention, between 2005 and 2012, nearly 2218 CHPS have been established in the country. The health staff in the CHIPS diagnose with RDTs and treat malaria and assist delivery at the community. However, presumptive treatment of malaria may occur for logistic reasons, when RDTs stock-out. Prior to 2007, patients of all ages were charged for malaria diagnosis and treatment, which was a major barrier to accessing basic health services for majority of the population. To address the problem of access, the NHIS was initiated in 2003 and became operational in 2005 to subsidize maternal and child health services, which became free in 2007. In the NHIS, urban and rural populations pay a premium of about US$17 and US$11 per year, respectively, and when the cost is beyond what NHIS cover, patients cover the difference. For people whose inability to pay is certified by local authorities, the Government covers all. Despite these provisions, the coverage of the NHIS remains at 38% owing to financial challenges to sustain the scheme, identification of the poor and vulnerable, identification (ID) card management, quality of care, and slow information system [4]. Long-lasting insecticidal nets and IRS data were obtained from district records. The proportion of the population potentially protected by LLINs was calculated for each year, assuming each LLIN covered 1.8 persons and lasted 3 years. Prospective district population was derived from the 2010 Ghanaian census, using the United Nations growth rate for Ghana [5, 6]. To measure ACT availability, number of months-ACT stock-out was obtained from records of hospital medical stores. Stock-out was defined when a hospital had no ACT in stock for more than 7 days in a month. A WHO standardized protocol (unpublished) was used for hospital data collection. A total of 88 hospitals in three epidemiological zones were randomly sampled (28 in savannah, 30 in forest, 30 in coastal). Although the design was to select 30 representative hospitals from each zone, the savannah had only 28 hospitals and all were sampled. Data abstraction teams consisting of two persons visited each hospital for 2 days. Monthly summary reports were used as the main source of records for: (i) outpatient all-cause consultations and malaria cases; (ii) inpatient all-cause and malaria admissions, all-cause deaths, malaria deaths, anaemia admissions, and anaemia deaths; and, (iii) laboratory records for microscopically tested and positive cases. Where monthly summary records were missing, register books were used as primary source. Data were collected for two age groups: all ages and under 5 years of age. Analysis of microscopic tests and confirmed cases was possible only for all ages as records of microscopic results could not be disaggregated by age, outpatient or inpatients. Microscopically confirmed malaria cases, malaria admissions and malaria deaths were the main interest of the analysis. A confirmed malaria case for this study was defined as a blood slide positive for malaria. Malaria admission was defined as a microscopically confirmed inpatient case, diagnosed at discharge as severe malaria. However, some malaria admissions were admitted based on clinical signs suggestive of severe malaria. A malaria death was defined as death attributed to malaria among the admitted cases. All anaemia admissions were assumed to be severe anaemia (<7 mg/dl). The test positivity rate (TPR) was computed by dividing number of positive slides by the total number of slides examined. To control for other factors that might influence the observed trends, the following additional indicators were computed: (i) non-malaria outpatient consultations (all-cause outpatient cases minus outpatient malaria cases); (ii) non-malaria admissions (all-cause admissions minus malaria admissions); and, (iii) non-malaria deaths (all-cause deaths minus malaria deaths). In addition, data on admitted patients with or without health insurance were extracted from the DHMIS-2 to assess the difference in disease trends among those insured and non-insured. These allowed the assessment of whether changes in malaria cases and deaths were truly attributable to interventions or to changes in healthcare-seeking behaviours or other factors that affect all diseases in a similar way. In addition, the trends of child mortality from population-based surveys for Ghana were also reviewed and triangulated with the trends observed in the hospitals. To control for the potential effect of climatic changes in trends of malaria during pre- or post-scale-up periods, data on monthly rainfall in mm, minimum and maximum temperature in  °C by region, were obtained from the Ghanaian Meteorology Department. For filling missing monthly data, either of the following approaches were applied: (i) if the missing data were in the 1st year, then average the consecutive 2 years of the same month, (ii) if the missing data were in the last year, then average the two preceding years of the same month; and, (iii) if the missing data were in between 2 years, running averages of the preceding and consecutive year for the same month. Because the data points end in June 2015, monthly data were aggregated biannually (two periods for each year) making a total of 21 periods covering January 2005–June 2015. Assuming all other interventions constant, the effect of an LLIN mass campaign since 2011 was evaluated by comparing the disease trends of the pre-scale up years (2005–2010), i.e., period 1–11 with that of period 12–21 (post-scale up years 2011–2015). Changes on trends were estimated as relative per cent change by comparing the observed value and predicted value at period 21 assuming a continuation of the pre-scale up time trend throughout period 21 if there were no interventions (counterfactual trend). The interpretation of the predicted relative change in percentage at period 21 therefore takes into account the trends (slop) of all the values during 2011 and 2015. This was done using a segmented regression model of an interrupted time series with breakpoint of period 11 [7], an approach that has increasingly become useful to evaluate impact of public health interventions [8, 9] including malaria [10, 11]. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) around effect estimates were computed using the CI around the regression coefficient. A percentage difference with a CI that does not include zero in the range was considered a significant change (P < 0.05). This model corrects for autocorrelation [12, 13] and adjusts the change estimate allowing for: (1) possible time trend of the indicator during the pre-scale-up period, (2) a possible immediate drop or rise of the indicator following the start of the campaign; and, (3) an effect of the campaign on the post-scale up at a given period. In addition, a stratified analysis using segmented regression was applied to compare changes in disease trends in IRS districts (Northern region) and non-IRS districts.

Based on the information provided, here are some potential innovations that could be used to improve access to maternal health:

1. Mobile Health (mHealth) Solutions: Develop mobile applications or text messaging services to provide pregnant women with information on prenatal care, nutrition, and reminders for appointments. This can help improve access to maternal health information and support.

2. Telemedicine: Implement telemedicine programs that allow pregnant women in remote areas to consult with healthcare professionals through video calls or phone consultations. This can help overcome geographical barriers and provide access to quality prenatal care.

3. Community Health Workers: Train and deploy community health workers to provide maternal health services, including prenatal care, education, and referrals. These workers can reach women in underserved areas and provide personalized care.

4. Maternal Health Vouchers: Introduce voucher programs that provide pregnant women with access to essential maternal health services, such as antenatal care visits, delivery services, and postnatal care. This can help reduce financial barriers and improve access to quality care.

5. Transport Solutions: Develop transportation initiatives, such as ambulance services or transportation vouchers, to ensure that pregnant women can reach healthcare facilities in a timely manner. This can help overcome transportation challenges in rural areas.

6. Maternal Health Clinics: Establish dedicated maternal health clinics that provide comprehensive prenatal care, delivery services, and postnatal care. These clinics can be equipped with trained healthcare professionals and necessary medical equipment to ensure safe and quality care for pregnant women.

7. Maternal Health Education Programs: Implement community-based education programs that focus on raising awareness about maternal health, including the importance of prenatal care, nutrition, and birth preparedness. This can empower women with knowledge and encourage them to seek timely care.

8. Public-Private Partnerships: Foster collaborations between the government, private sector, and non-profit organizations to improve access to maternal health services. This can involve leveraging private sector resources and expertise to expand healthcare infrastructure and service delivery.

9. Maternal Health Financing: Explore innovative financing mechanisms, such as health insurance schemes or microfinance programs, to make maternal health services more affordable and accessible to all women, especially those from low-income backgrounds.

10. Data Monitoring and Evaluation: Establish robust data monitoring and evaluation systems to track the impact of interventions on maternal health outcomes. This can help identify gaps and inform evidence-based decision-making for future improvements.

It is important to note that the specific context and needs of the target population should be considered when implementing these innovations.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the information provided, a recommendation to improve access to maternal health would be to continue and expand the distribution of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) in Ghana. The study showed that the implementation of LLIN mass campaigns targeting all ages since 2011 resulted in a significant decrease in malaria cases and deaths, particularly in children under five. This indicates that LLINs have a positive impact on reducing malaria, which is a major cause of maternal mortality in Ghana.

To further improve access to maternal health, it is important to ensure that LLINs are routinely distributed to pregnant women, as they are at a higher risk of malaria-related complications. Additionally, expanding the coverage of IRS in malaria-endemic areas can provide an additional layer of protection against malaria transmission.

Furthermore, efforts should be made to address the financial challenges and improve the coverage of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS). The NHIS plays a crucial role in subsidizing maternal and child health services, making them more accessible to the population. However, the coverage of the NHIS remains at 38%, indicating the need for financial sustainability and improved identification of the poor and vulnerable.

Overall, a comprehensive approach that includes the distribution of LLINs and IRS, along with improving the coverage and sustainability of the NHIS, can contribute to improving access to maternal health and reducing maternal mortality in Ghana.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the information provided, here are some potential recommendations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Strengthen the distribution of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) to pregnant women: LLINs have been shown to be effective in reducing malaria cases and deaths. By ensuring that pregnant women have access to LLINs, the risk of malaria during pregnancy can be reduced, leading to improved maternal health outcomes.

2. Expand the coverage of indoor residual spraying (IRS): IRS has been implemented in certain districts in Ghana and has contributed to the reduction of malaria cases. Expanding the coverage of IRS to more districts can further reduce the burden of malaria, particularly among pregnant women who are at higher risk of severe malaria.

3. Improve access to antenatal care (ANC) services: ANC visits are crucial for monitoring the health of pregnant women and identifying any potential complications. Efforts should be made to increase the number of pregnant women who receive ANC services, particularly in remote and underserved areas.

4. Enhance the availability and affordability of maternal health services: Financial barriers can prevent pregnant women from accessing essential maternal health services. Measures should be taken to ensure that maternal health services are affordable and accessible to all women, including those from low-income backgrounds.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could be developed as follows:

1. Collect baseline data: Gather data on the current access to maternal health services, including the number of pregnant women receiving ANC, the availability of LLINs and IRS, and the affordability of maternal health services.

2. Define indicators: Identify key indicators to measure the impact of the recommendations, such as the number of pregnant women receiving LLINs, the percentage of pregnant women attending ANC visits, and the cost of maternal health services.

3. Develop a simulation model: Create a simulation model that incorporates the baseline data and the potential impact of the recommendations. The model should consider factors such as population demographics, geographical distribution, and healthcare infrastructure.

4. Run simulations: Use the simulation model to project the potential impact of the recommendations over a specific time period. This can be done by adjusting the relevant variables in the model, such as the coverage of LLINs, the number of ANC visits, and the cost of maternal health services.

5. Analyze results: Analyze the results of the simulations to assess the potential impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This can include evaluating changes in key indicators, such as the increase in the number of pregnant women receiving LLINs or attending ANC visits.

6. Refine and iterate: Based on the analysis of the simulation results, refine the recommendations and the simulation model as needed. Repeat the simulations to further assess the potential impact and make any necessary adjustments.

By using this methodology, policymakers and healthcare providers can gain insights into the potential impact of different interventions on improving access to maternal health. This can inform decision-making and resource allocation to prioritize the most effective strategies.

Partagez ceci :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email