Adding content to contacts: Measurement of high quality contacts for maternal and newborn health in Ethiopia, North East Nigeria, and Uttar Pradesh, India

listen audio

Study Justification:
– The study aimed to address the need for regular contact with high-quality services for families in high mortality settings.
– Existing population-based measurements of contacts do not reflect quality, so this study aimed to develop a method for estimating the population level coverage of high-quality contacts.
Study Highlights:
– The study was conducted in Gombe State, Nigeria, Ethiopia, and Uttar Pradesh, India.
– Cluster-based household and frontline health worker surveys were performed in each location.
– The study measured the frequency and content of contacts for antenatal care, skilled birth attendance, post-partum checks, and post-natal checks.
– The coverage of high-quality contacts was calculated for each location.
Study Recommendations:
– The study recommended measuring the content of care to reflect the quality of contacts.
– This measurement can reveal missed opportunities to deliver the best possible health care.
Key Role Players Needed to Address Recommendations:
– Community-based volunteers for maternal and newborn health
– Health staff at primary level health facilities
– Traditional Birth Attendants or Federation of Muslim Women Association of Nigeria volunteers
– Health extension workers
– Accredited Social Health Activists and Anganwadi workers
Cost Items to Include in Planning Recommendations:
– Training and supervision for community-based volunteers and health staff
– Supplies for health facilities
– Workload management for frontline health workers
– Infrastructure improvements for health facilities
Please note that the provided information is a summary of the study and does not include the actual cost estimates or specific details about the role players.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong, as it presents findings from a study conducted in three different geographies. However, the rating is not higher because the abstract does not provide specific details about the methodology used or the sample size. To improve the evidence, the abstract could include more information about the study design, sample size, and statistical analysis methods used.

Families in high mortality settings need regular contact with high quality services, but existing population-based measurements of contacts do not reflect quality. To address this, in 2012, we designed linked household and frontline worker surveys for Gombe State, Nigeria, Ethiopia, and Uttar Pradesh, India. Using reported frequency and content of contacts, we present a method for estimating the population level coverage of high quality contacts. Methods and Findings Linked cluster-based household and frontline health worker surveys were performed. Interviews were conducted in 40, 80 and 80 clusters in Gombe, Ethiopia, and Uttar Pradesh, respectively, including 348, 533, and 604 eligible women and 20, 76, and 55 skilled birth attendants. High quality contacts were defined as contacts during which recommended set of processes for routine health care were met. In Gombe, 61% (95% confidence interval 50- 72) of women had at least one antenatal contact, 22% (14-29) delivered with a skilled birth attendant, 7% (4-9) had a post-partum check and 4% (2-8) of newborns had a post-natal check. Coverage of high quality contacts was reduced to 11% (6-16), 8% (5-11), 0%, and 0% respectively. In Ethiopia, 56% (49-63) had at least one antenatal contact, 15% (11-22) delivered with a skilled birth attendant, 3% (2-6) had a post-partum check and 4% (2-6) of newborns had a post-natal check. Coverage of high quality contacts was 4% (2-6), 4% (2- 6), 0%, and 0%, respectively. In Uttar Pradesh 74% (69-79) had at least one antenatal contact, 76% (71-80) delivered with a skilled birth attendant, 54% (48-59) had a post-partum check and 19% (15-23) of newborns had a post-natal check. Coverage of high quality contacts was 6% (4-8), 4% (2-6), 0%, and 0% respectively. Conclusions Measuring content of care to reflect the quality of contacts can reveal missed opportunities to deliver best possible health care.

This study was performed in Gombe State of north east Nigeria, the regions of Oromia, Tigray, Amhara and Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples (SNNP) in Ethiopia, and in six districts (Jhansi, Hardoi, CSM Nagar, Maharanjganj, Sultanpur, Raebarailly) in the state of Uttar Pradesh in India. These three geographies are settings where the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation funds community based demand and supply side innovations to improve outcomes for mothers and newborns.[16] While these study areas are geographically diverse they each represent predominantly rural settings with high fertility and high maternal and newborn mortality (Table 2). 1 Nigerian Bureau of Statistics, Nigeria: Social Statistics of Nigeria, 2012 2 IDEAS baseline survey 3 The National Literacy Survey, June 2010, National Bureau of Statistics, Nigeria. www.nigerianstat.gov.ng 4 Nigerian Demographic and Health Survey preliminary report, 2013 http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/PR41/PR41.pdf 5 UNICEF (2011) Country factsheets. www.unicef.org/infobycountry/ethiopia_statistics.html 6 Indian population Census 2011, www.census2011.co.in/census/state/uttarpradesh.html 7 http://www.unicef.org/nigeria/ng_publications_advocacybrochure.pdf [for north east Nigeria as a whole] 8 United Nations Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-agency group http://www.maternalmortalitydata.org/ 9 Annual health survey bulletin 2011–12: Uttar Pradesh. http://www.censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/files2012/Uttar%20Pradesh_Bulletin%202011-12.pdf 10 Population Reference Bureau at http://www.un.org/esa/population/meetings/EGM-Fertility2009/Haub.pdf 11Annual Abstract of Statistics 2011, National Bureau of Statistics, Nigeria. In each of these study settings, baseline surveys were carried out in 2012 as part of an ongoing study to investigate the extent to which innovations that were intended to enhance contacts between families and frontline workers (community based volunteers for maternal and newborn health, and health staff at primary level health facilities) lead to an increase in the coverage of life-saving interventions; follow-up data collection in the same settings is planned for 2015. The study combined a cluster based household survey with a survey of the frontline health workers and facilities (health posts and primary health facilities) assigned to provide routine maternal and newborn health services to those households before implementation of the innovations. These baseline data are presented here. Gombe State has 11 local government areas, and population statistics are available from the National Population Commission for enumeration areas throughout the State. The baseline survey included 40 clusters selected from 10 of the 11 local government areas in Gombe State (excluding Gombe Town). Clusters were defined as segmented enumeration areas. Cluster sampling was performed by listing all enumeration areas within the 10 local government areas, cumulating their population size, and systematically selecting 40 from the list with probability proportional to size. All households in selected enumeration areas were listed, and enumeration areas segmented into groups of 75 or fewer households: field teams randomly selected one segment from each enumeration area as the cluster to be surveyed. All households within the selected cluster were visited (Fig 1). For each cluster, community level volunteers (for example, Traditional Birth Attendants or Federation of Muslim Women Association of Nigeria volunteers) were identified and listed and a simple random sample of up to 3 volunteers selected for interview about recent maternal and newborn health care they had provided. The primary health centre assigned to provide routine antenatal, intra-partum and post-natal care to the selected cluster was also surveyed, and the nurse who carried out the last delivery recorded in the maternity register interviewed (the frontline health worker and facility surveys). Ethiopia is organised by region, zone, woreda (district), kebele (similar to a ward; lowest level of census population data) and gote (proxy for village). The baseline survey included 80 clusters, a cluster being defined as a segmented gote. The 80 clusters were systematically sampled from 76 woreda across four regions of Ethiopia (Amhara, Oromia, SNNP and Tigray). Sampling was performed by listing all woreda geographically from north to south of the country, listing kebeles and their population size alphabetically within each woreda, and 80 kebele sampled with probability proportional to population size. Gotes within each of these 80 kebele were listed and one gote per kebele selected using simple random sampling. At each selected gote, all households were listed and gotes segmented into groups of 75 or fewer households: field teams randomly selected one segment from each gote as the cluster to be surveyed. All households within each selected cluster were visited (Fig 2). For each sampled cluster, the community level volunteers were identified and listed and a simple random sample of up to 3 volunteers selected for interview about recent health care they had provided. The health post assigned to the village was surveyed, and the health extension worker on duty interviewed. The primary health centre assigned to provide routine antenatal, intra-partum and post-natal care to the selected cluster was also surveyed, and the nurse who attended the last delivery recorded in the maternity register interviewed (the frontline health worker and facility surveys). Uttar Pradesh is organised by district, block, and village. Population data is available at the village level from the 2001 Census. The baseline survey included 80 clusters, a cluster being defined as a segmented village. Sampling was performed by listing all villages from 51 blocks spread across six districts in Uttar Pradesh, cumulating their population size and systematically selecting 80 villages with probability proportional to size. All households in sampled villages were listed, and villages segmented into groups of 75 or fewer households: field teams randomly selected one segment from the selected village as the cluster to be surveyed. All households within the selected cluster were visited (Fig 3). For each sampled cluster, the community level volunteers (Accredited Social Health Activists and Anganwadi workers) were identified and listed and a simple random sample of up to 3 volunteers selected for interview about recent maternal and newborn health care they had provided. The primary health centre or community health centre assigned to provide routine antenatal, intra-partum and post-natal care to the selected cluster was also surveyed, and the nurse who attended the last delivery recorded in the maternity register interviewed (the frontline health worker and facility surveys). Survey clusters were allocated to teams of five interviewers and one supervisor, and each cluster was scheduled to be completed within two working days. In Gombe State and Uttar Pradesh all data were collected using handheld personal digital devices (PDAs). In Ethiopia frontline health worker and health facility data were collected using PDAs and household data collected using paper based questionnaires, which were double entered and reconciled. In all three countries the household questionnaire was modular and applied by interviewers who were allocated five to eight households per day depending on country and circumstance. At every household in the selected cluster the interviewer identified the household head or representative and, after obtaining informed written consent, recorded information about household socio-economic characteristics and completed a household roster of all usual residents. Every resident woman aged 13–49 years was then interviewed individually by the same interviewer and asked questions about her access to health care in the last year, and a detailed set of questions if she reported that she had had a live birth in the 12 months prior to survey. The frontline health worker questionnaire included questions about training and supervision, routine activities carried out, availability of supplies, workload during the last month and a detailed set of questions about behaviours during the last birth they attended. The facility questionnaire included a check list of staff, equipment, drugs, and infrastructure items present on the day of survey, and data extraction from maternity registers to ascertain facility workload during the last six months. All survey tools were pre-tested, and implemented in Hausa (Gombe State, Nigeria), Amharic (Amhara and SNNP regions, Ethiopia), Oromifa (Oromia region, Ethiopia) and Tigrinya (Tigray region, Ethiopia), and Hindi (State of Uttar Pradesh, India). Data were analysed in STATA 12 (www.stata.com) using svy commands to adjust for the cluster sampling design. In each geography, the sample selection was expected to result in interviews with at least 350 women who had a live birth in the previous 12 months: this number was sufficient to estimate, with 90% power and 95% confidence, percentage points of coverage of all contact and content indicators across the continuum of care with approximately five percent precision, assuming a cluster design effect of 1.4. Initially, contact and content indicators were calculated separately. Four contact coverage estimates were defined: (1) the percent of women with a live birth in the previous 12 months who had at least one antenatal care visit during that pregnancy; (2) the percent of women with a live birth in the previous 12 months who were attended at birth by a skilled birth attendant; (3) the percent of women with a live birth in the previous 12 months who had a post-partum check within 48 hours of birth; (4) the percent of newborns born alive in the previous 12 months whose mother reported that they had a post-natal check within 48 hours of birth. Amongst the same group of women with a live birth in the previous 12 months, the reported frequency with which each of the processes to define content of care (Table 1) occurred was calculated for all women, and then also calculated restricted to those women who had a contact. Finally, point estimates for contacts were combined with those for processes to generate population level estimates of high quality contacts, being: (1) the percent of women who had at least one antenatal care visit and for whom all eight antenatal processes were met; (2) the percent of women who were attended at birth by a skilled birth attendant and received active management of third stage of labour (AMTSL); (3) the percent of women who had a post-partum check within 48 hours of birth and for whom all five post-partum processes were met; (4) the percent of newborns who had a post-natal check within 48 hours of birth and for whom all five post-natal processes were met. These calculations were all carried out using household data with the exception of the intra-partum process AMTSL (which includes controlled cord traction, uterine massage, and administration of a prophylactic uterotonic). Women from the general population are often not able to report on the behaviours of birth attendants during delivery. To address this, efforts to link data sources have been proposed.[17, 18] In this analysis we linked skilled birth attendant responses about whether or not they had performed controlled cord traction, uterine massage and administered a prophylactic uterotonic at the last birth they attended (from the frontline health worker survey), to the household level coverage of delivery with a skilled birth attendant (household survey). In Nigeria, national level approval was obtained from the National Health Research Ethics Committee, Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja, and in Gombe State from the State Ministry of Health in both Gombe and Abuja. In Ethiopia, national level support was obtained from the Ministry of Health in Ethiopia, and ethical approval from the Ministry of Science and Technology; at the Regional level, approval was granted by the Regional IRBs in Amhara, Oromia, SNNP, and Tigray. In Uttar Pradesh, approval was obtained from SPECT-ERB, an independent Ethical Review Board, and written permission from the National Rural Health Mission of Uttar Pradesh. Ethical approval was also obtained from LSHTM (reference 6088). All respondents provided informed, voluntary written consent to be interviewed. In addition, written carer consent was also obtained for the small number of household survey respondents under the age of 16 years.

The study mentioned in the description focuses on improving access to maternal health in high mortality settings. The researchers designed linked household and frontline worker surveys in Nigeria, Ethiopia, and Uttar Pradesh, India to measure the frequency and content of contacts between families and healthcare providers. They defined high quality contacts as contacts during which a recommended set of processes for routine health care were met. The study found that while there were some contacts, the coverage of high quality contacts was low in all three settings.

Based on this study, potential innovations to improve access to maternal health could include:

1. Strengthening training and supervision for frontline health workers: This could help ensure that healthcare providers are equipped with the necessary skills and knowledge to provide high quality care during contacts with pregnant women and new mothers.

2. Improving availability of essential supplies and equipment: Access to necessary supplies and equipment is crucial for providing high quality maternal health care. Innovations could focus on ensuring that health facilities have adequate stocks of essential items such as medications, sterile equipment, and clean delivery kits.

3. Enhancing community-based demand generation: Innovations could aim to increase awareness and demand for maternal health services within the community. This could involve community mobilization activities, health education campaigns, and the involvement of community leaders and influencers.

4. Strengthening referral systems: Improving the referral system between community-based volunteers, frontline health workers, and higher-level health facilities could help ensure that pregnant women and new mothers receive appropriate and timely care. Innovations could focus on streamlining the referral process and improving communication between different levels of care.

5. Utilizing technology for data collection and monitoring: Innovations could explore the use of digital tools, such as mobile applications or electronic health records, to collect and monitor data on maternal health contacts. This could help improve the accuracy and efficiency of data collection, as well as facilitate real-time monitoring of service delivery.

These are just a few potential innovations that could be considered to improve access to maternal health based on the findings of the study. It is important to note that the specific context and needs of each setting should be taken into account when designing and implementing these innovations.
AI Innovations Description
The recommendation from the study is to measure the content of care to reflect the quality of contacts in order to improve access to maternal health. The study suggests that existing population-based measurements of contacts do not accurately reflect the quality of services provided. By adding content to contacts, the study proposes a method for estimating the population-level coverage of high-quality contacts.

The study was conducted in Gombe State, Nigeria, the regions of Oromia, Tigray, Amhara, and Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples (SNNP) in Ethiopia, and in six districts in the state of Uttar Pradesh, India. These areas were chosen because they represent predominantly rural settings with high fertility and high maternal and newborn mortality rates.

The study used linked household and frontline worker surveys to collect data. Interviews were conducted in selected clusters, and data was collected on the frequency and content of contacts between families and frontline health workers. High-quality contacts were defined as contacts during which a recommended set of processes for routine health care were met.

The study found that the coverage of high-quality contacts was low in all three study areas. For example, in Gombe State, Nigeria, only 11% of women had high-quality antenatal contacts, 8% delivered with a skilled birth attendant, 0% had a post-partum check, and 0% of newborns had a post-natal check.

The study concludes that measuring the content of care can reveal missed opportunities to deliver the best possible health care. By improving the quality of contacts, access to maternal health can be improved and better outcomes for mothers and newborns can be achieved.
AI Innovations Methodology
The study mentioned in the description focuses on improving access to maternal health in three different regions: Gombe State in Nigeria, Ethiopia, and Uttar Pradesh in India. The study aims to measure the content of contacts between families and frontline health workers to assess the quality of care provided. The methodology used in the study involves conducting linked household and frontline worker surveys in selected clusters within each region.

In each region, clusters were selected using a sampling method that took into account the population size of each area. For example, in Gombe State, 40 clusters were selected from 10 of the 11 local government areas. In Ethiopia, 80 clusters were selected from four regions (Amhara, Oromia, SNNP, and Tigray). In Uttar Pradesh, 80 clusters were selected from six districts. All households within the selected clusters were visited, and interviews were conducted with eligible women and skilled birth attendants.

The study collected data on the frequency and content of contacts between families and frontline health workers. Contacts were defined as interactions during which a recommended set of processes for routine health care were met. The content of care was assessed based on the reported behaviors and practices of the frontline health workers.

The study analyzed the data using statistical software and calculated various coverage estimates, such as the percentage of women who had at least one antenatal care visit, the percentage of women who were attended at birth by a skilled birth attendant, and the percentage of newborns who had a postnatal check. The study also calculated the coverage of high-quality contacts, which were contacts during which all recommended processes for routine health care were met.

To simulate the impact of recommendations on improving access to maternal health, the study combined the coverage estimates for contacts and processes. For example, the study calculated the percentage of women who had at least one antenatal care visit and for whom all eight antenatal processes were met. These population-level estimates of high-quality contacts provide insights into the missed opportunities to deliver the best possible health care.

Overall, the methodology used in the study involved conducting surveys in selected clusters, collecting data on the frequency and content of contacts, and analyzing the data to estimate coverage of contacts and high-quality contacts. This approach allows for the assessment of the impact of innovations on improving access to maternal health in the study regions.

Partagez ceci :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email