Acceptability of evidence-based neonatal care practices in rural Uganda – Implications for programming

listen audio

Study Justification:
– The study aimed to explore the acceptability of evidence-based interventions for maternal and neonatal care in rural Uganda.
– It sought to understand whether these interventions are acceptable to the target community and health service providers.
– The study aimed to identify barriers to implementing these interventions and to make recommendations for improving neonatal outcomes.
Highlights:
– Most maternal and newborn recommended practices were found to be acceptable to both the community and health service providers.
– However, health system and community barriers were prevalent and need to be overcome for better neonatal outcomes.
– Pregnant women did not understand the importance of early and regular antenatal care unless they felt ill.
– Women preferred to deliver in health facilities but couldn’t afford the cost of drugs and supplies.
– Postnatal care was non-existent in the region.
– Delayed bathing and not putting anything on the umbilical cord were not acceptable practices, requiring negotiation of alternatives.
Recommendations:
– Health promotion programs should prioritize postnatal care and consider the local socio-cultural situation and health system barriers.
– Male involvement and promotion of waiting shelters at selected health units should be considered to increase access to supervised deliveries.
– Scaling up evidence-based practices for maternal-neonatal health in Sub-Saharan Africa should involve rapid appraisal and adaptation of intervention packages to address local health system and socio-cultural situations.
Key Role Players:
– Community leaders
– Health workers
– Traditional birth attendants
– District leaders of health services
– National policy makers
– Research assistants
– Social scientists
– Medical doctors
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Training and capacity building for health workers and traditional birth attendants
– Development and implementation of health promotion programs
– Provision of drugs and supplies for health facilities
– Construction and maintenance of waiting shelters at selected health units
– Research and data collection expenses
– Translation services for interviews and focus group discussions
– Ethical approval and oversight from institutional review boards and regulatory bodies

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is fairly strong, but there are some areas for improvement. The study conducted 10 focus group discussions and 10 key informant interviews, which provides a good amount of qualitative data. The study also includes information about the study location, participants, and data collection methods, which adds to the credibility of the findings. However, the abstract does not mention any quantitative data or statistical analysis, which could strengthen the evidence. To improve the evidence, the researchers could consider including quantitative data and conducting statistical analysis to support their findings.

Background: Although evidence-based interventions to reach the Millennium Development Goals for Maternal and Neonatal mortality reduction exist, they have not yet been operationalised and scaled up in Sub-Saharan African cultural and health systems. A key concern is whether these internationally recommended practices are acceptable and will be demanded by the target community. We explored the acceptability of these interventions in two rural districts of Uganda. Methods: We conducted 10 focus group discussions consisting of mothers, fathers, grand parents and child minders (older children who take care of other children). We also did 10 key informant interviews with health workers and traditional birth attendants. Results: Most maternal and newborn recommended practices are acceptable to both the community and to health service providers. However, health system and community barriers were prevalent and will need to be overcome for better neonatal outcomes. Pregnant women did not comprehend the importance of attending antenatal care early or more than once unless they felt ill. Women prefer to deliver in health facilities but most do not do so because they cannot afford the cost of drugs and supplies which are demanded in a situation of poverty and limited male support. Postnatal care is non-existent. For the newborn, delayed bathing and putting nothing on the umbilical cord were neither acceptable to parents nor to health providers, requiring negotiation of alternative practices. Conclusion: The recommended maternal-newborn practices are generally acceptable to the community and health service providers, but often are not practiced due to health systems and community barriers. Communities associate the need for antenatal care attendance with feeling ill, and postnatal care is non-existent in this region. Health promotion programs to improve newborn care must prioritize postnatal care, and take into account the local socio-cultural situation and health systems barriers including the financial burden. Male involvement and promotion of waiting shelters at selected health units should be considered in order to increase access to supervised deliveries. Scale-up of the evidence based practices for maternal-neonatal health in Sub-Saharan Africa should follow rapid appraisal and adaptation of intervention packages to address the local health system and socio-cultural situation. © 2008 Waiswa et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This study was undertaken in two rural districts of Iganga and Mayuge during December 2006 and January 2007 in Busoga region, Eastern Uganda. The Busoga region has seven districts and about 3 million people, or 10% of Uganda’s population. Ten focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted as follows: two with younger mothers less than 30 years; four with older mothers more than 30 years or having grandchildren; two with fathers and another two with child minders (older children who take care of other children) of up to 13 years of age. Selection of young mothers and fathers was limited to those having children less than six months of age in order to ensure that responses reflect recent/current practices. In addition, we also conducted key-informant interviews (KIs) with six health workers and four traditional birth attendants (TBAs). Villages were selected for interviews from both near and far from the hospital to represent the rural-urban divide. Using guidelines from the research team, community leaders identified participants for the FGDs, and district leaders of health services identified health workers and TBAs for the KIs. Pre-tested checklists guided discussions about the acceptability and barriers to adapting practices within the continuum of care approach [9,10,20] with special focus on ANC, intra-partum care, and postnatal care for the mother and the baby, and to home visits by a volunteer to promote improved care during pregnancy, delivery and in the postnatal period. Participants were asked to present their own experiences and actions, or otherwise to describe general attitudes. Interviews with health workers were conducted in English, tape-recorded, transcribed and compiled with field notes. Interviews with TBAs and all the FGDs were conducted in the local language, Lusoga, tape-recorded and transcribed by the moderators. Two Lusoga speakers independently translated interviews into English, leaving all local terminologies in Lusoga to keep informative words intact. Analysis of the in-depth interviews (IDIs) and FGDs used latent thematic content analysis. Transcripts were first read several times to get an overall picture and then meaningful units were coded, condensed and categorized into broad themes [21]. Barriers to care seeking were characterized according to the three delays model which includes delays in deciding to seek care, delay in reaching the health facility, and delay in receiving care once at the health facility [22,23]. The study tools were developed in consultation with national policy makers who included the Iganga and Mayuge districts, the Ministry of Health, the World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF, and Saving Newborn Lives (SNL) Uganda field offices. An experienced social scientist and a medical doctor trained and supervised the research assistants during pilot testing and field work. All moderators were experienced and their minimum education was to diploma level. Verbal informed consent was sought and obtained from all participants. The study was approved by the Makerere University School of Public Health Institutional Review Board and the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology.

Based on the information provided, here are some potential innovations that could improve access to maternal health:

1. Health promotion programs: Develop and implement targeted health promotion programs to educate pregnant women and their families about the importance of attending antenatal care early and regularly, as well as the benefits of postnatal care. These programs should address the local socio-cultural situation and health system barriers, including the financial burden.

2. Financial support: Explore options for providing financial support to pregnant women who cannot afford the cost of drugs and supplies required for delivery in health facilities. This could involve government subsidies, community-based health insurance schemes, or partnerships with NGOs to cover the costs.

3. Male involvement: Promote and encourage male involvement in maternal health by educating men about the importance of supporting their partners during pregnancy and childbirth. This could include providing information about the benefits of supervised deliveries and encouraging men to accompany their partners to antenatal and postnatal care visits.

4. Waiting shelters: Establish waiting shelters at selected health units to provide a safe and comfortable place for pregnant women to stay as they approach their due date. This would ensure that women have access to supervised deliveries and reduce the barriers related to distance and transportation.

5. Adaptation of intervention packages: Conduct rapid appraisal and adaptation of intervention packages to address the local health system and socio-cultural situation. This could involve tailoring existing evidence-based practices to better suit the needs and preferences of the target community.

It is important to note that these recommendations are based on the specific context described in the study and may need to be further assessed and adapted to fit the local circumstances.
AI Innovations Description
The study titled “Acceptability of evidence-based neonatal care practices in rural Uganda – Implications for programming” explores the acceptability of evidence-based interventions to improve maternal and neonatal health in rural districts of Uganda. The study conducted 10 focus group discussions with mothers, fathers, grandparents, and child minders, as well as 10 key informant interviews with health workers and traditional birth attendants.

The findings of the study indicate that most maternal and newborn recommended practices are acceptable to both the community and health service providers. However, there are barriers in the health system and community that need to be addressed to improve neonatal outcomes. Some of the barriers identified include the lack of understanding among pregnant women about the importance of early and regular antenatal care, the inability of women to afford the cost of drugs and supplies for delivery in health facilities, and the non-existence of postnatal care in the region.

Based on these findings, the study recommends several strategies to improve access to maternal health. These include prioritizing postnatal care in health promotion programs, taking into account the local socio-cultural situation and health system barriers, promoting male involvement in maternal health, and establishing waiting shelters at selected health units to increase access to supervised deliveries. The study also suggests the need for rapid appraisal and adaptation of intervention packages to address the local health system and socio-cultural situation when scaling up evidence-based practices for maternal-neonatal health in Sub-Saharan Africa.

It is important to note that this study was conducted in two rural districts of Uganda in 2006 and 2007. Therefore, it is recommended to consider the current context and specific needs of the target community when implementing interventions to improve access to maternal health.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided description, here are some potential recommendations for improving access to maternal health:

1. Increase awareness and education: Develop targeted health promotion programs to educate pregnant women and their families about the importance of attending antenatal care early and regularly, as well as the benefits of postnatal care. This can help address the lack of understanding and misconceptions about maternal and newborn care.

2. Address financial barriers: Implement strategies to reduce the cost of drugs and supplies for pregnant women, especially for those living in poverty. This could involve subsidizing or providing free essential medications and supplies for maternal and newborn care.

3. Improve male involvement: Promote and encourage male involvement in maternal health by engaging fathers in antenatal care visits and promoting their support during childbirth. This can help overcome the limited male support that currently exists and increase access to supervised deliveries.

4. Establish waiting shelters: Create waiting shelters at selected health units to provide a safe and comfortable space for pregnant women to stay before giving birth. This can help address the issue of limited access to health facilities and encourage more women to deliver in a supervised setting.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could be developed using the following steps:

1. Define the indicators: Identify specific indicators that measure access to maternal health, such as the percentage of pregnant women attending antenatal care, the percentage of women delivering in health facilities, and the percentage of women receiving postnatal care.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather data on the current status of these indicators in the target community or region. This could involve conducting surveys, interviews, or reviewing existing data sources.

3. Develop a simulation model: Create a simulation model that incorporates the potential impact of the recommendations on the identified indicators. This model should consider factors such as population size, demographic characteristics, and the existing healthcare infrastructure.

4. Input data and run simulations: Input the baseline data into the simulation model and run multiple simulations to estimate the potential impact of the recommendations. This could involve adjusting variables such as the level of awareness and education, the availability of financial support, and the level of male involvement.

5. Analyze results: Analyze the results of the simulations to determine the projected changes in the indicators of access to maternal health. This can help identify the most effective recommendations and prioritize interventions for implementation.

6. Refine and validate the model: Continuously refine and validate the simulation model based on new data and feedback from stakeholders. This will ensure that the model accurately reflects the local context and provides reliable estimates of the impact of the recommendations.

By following this methodology, policymakers and healthcare providers can gain insights into the potential impact of different recommendations on improving access to maternal health and make informed decisions about intervention strategies.

Partagez ceci :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email