Intermittent Preventive Therapy with Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine for Malaria in Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Study from Tororo, Uganda

listen audio

Study Justification:
– The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) in reducing the risk of malaria and improving birth outcomes in an area of Uganda with high malaria transmission intensity.
– The study was conducted in response to reports of waning efficacy of IPTp with SP, particularly in regions where antimalarial resistance to this drug is widespread.
Highlights:
– The study included 565 HIV-uninfected women giving birth at Tororo District Hospital in southeastern Uganda.
– The primary objective was to measure the associations between the use of SP during pregnancy and the risk of adverse outcomes, including placental malaria, low birth weight, maternal parasitemia, and maternal anemia.
– The study found that the reported use of ≥2 doses of SP was associated with a significantly lower odds of placental malaria, low birth weight, maternal parasitemia, or maternal anemia when considering a composite measure of any adverse outcome.
– However, the prevalence of placental malaria by histopathology was still high, even among women who reported taking at least 2 doses of SP during pregnancy.
Recommendations:
– The study suggests that the current IPTp strategy with SP may not be fully effective in preventing placental malaria and improving birth outcomes in areas with high malaria transmission intensity.
– Further research is needed to explore alternative strategies for preventing malaria in pregnancy and improving birth outcomes in these settings.
– Policy makers should consider evaluating the effectiveness of alternative antimalarial drugs or combination therapies for IPTp in areas with high antimalarial resistance to SP.
Key Role Players:
– Uganda National Council of Science and Technology
– Institutional review boards of the University of California, San Francisco
– Makerere University
– U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Research funding for further studies on alternative strategies for preventing malaria in pregnancy and improving birth outcomes
– Costs associated with evaluating the effectiveness of alternative antimalarial drugs or combination therapies for IPTp
– Costs for training healthcare providers on new strategies and guidelines for preventing malaria in pregnancy
– Costs for implementing and monitoring the new strategies and guidelines in healthcare facilities

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is moderately strong. The study conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 565 HIV-uninfected women in Tororo, Uganda to measure the associations between the use of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) during pregnancy and adverse outcomes. The study found that the reported use of ≥2 doses of SP was associated with a significantly lower odds of placental malaria, low birth weight, maternal parasitemia, or maternal anemia. However, the study also reported high prevalence of placental malaria by histopathology even among women who reported taking at least 2 doses of SP. To improve the strength of the evidence, future studies could consider using a longitudinal design to assess the effectiveness of IPTp with SP over time and investigate potential factors contributing to the high prevalence of placental malaria despite SP usage.

Background:Intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is widely recommended in sub-Saharan Africa to reduce the risk of malaria and improve birth outcomes. However, there are reports that the efficacy of IPTp with SP is waning, especially in parts of Africa where antimalarial resistance to this drug has become widespread.Methodology/Principal Findings:We conducted a cross-sectional study of 565 HIV-uninfected women giving birth at Tororo District Hospital in southeastern Uganda. The primary objective of the study was to measure associations between use of SP during pregnancy from antenatal records and the risk of adverse outcomes including placental malaria, low birth weight, maternal parasitemia and maternal anemia. The proportion of women who reported taking 0, 1, 2, and 3 doses of SP during pregnancy was 5.7%, 35.8%, 56.6% and 2.0% respectively. Overall, the prevalence of placental malaria was 17.5%, 28.1%, and 66.2% by placental smear, PCR, and histopathology, respectively. In multivariate analyses controlling for potential confounders, ≥2 doses of SP was associated with non-significant trends towards lower odds of placental malaria by placental smear (OR = 0.75, p = 0.25), placental malaria by PCR (OR = 0.93, p = 0.71), placental malaria by histopathology (OR = 0.75, p = 0.16), low birth weight (OR = 0.63, p = 0.11), maternal parasitemia (OR = 0.88, p = 0.60) and maternal anemia (OR = 0.88, p = 0.48). Using a composite outcome, ≥2doses of SP was associated with a significantly lower odds of placental malaria, low birth weight, maternal parasitemia, or maternal anemia (OR = 0.52, p = 0.01).Conclusions/Significance:In this area of Uganda with intense malaria transmission, the prevalence of placental malaria by histopathology was high even among women who reported taking at least 2 doses of SP during pregnancy. The reported use of ≥2 doses of SP was not associated with protection against individual birth and maternal outcome measures but did protect against a composite measure of any adverse outcome. © 2013.

The study protocol was approved by the Uganda National Council of Science and Technology and the institutional review boards of the University of California, San Francisco, Makerere University, and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Written informed consent was sought from all participants before being enrolled in the study. This study was conducted in Tororo, an area of southeastern Uganda with high malaria transmission intensity and an entomological inoculation rate recently estimated to be 125 infectious bites per person per year in 2011–12 (Grant Dorsey, personal communication). Study participants were women giving birth at Tororo District Hospital (TDH), a government hospital that provides antenatal services and free HIV testing to all pregnant women. Using a cross-sectional study design, all pregnant women with singleton births delivering at TDH who were known to be HIV-uninfected were screened for enrollment if they delivered between Monday 8∶00 am through Friday 4∶00 pm from February 28th through July 4th, 2011. Women were enrolled if they fulfilled the following selection criteria: 1) SP use documented from antenatal card if attended antenatal care, 2) HIV status known and negative, 3) absence of reported antimalarial therapy other than SP in the previous 1 month, and 4) provision of informed consent. A standardized questionnaire was administered to all enrolled women including review of their government issued antenatal card. Information collected as part of the questionnaire included demographics, previous pregnancies, bednet use, education level, ownership of household items, and the number and timing of doses of SP (for which administration is directly observed in the antenatal clinic) and other medications. Delivery outcomes were assessed and birth weight obtained using a digital scale (Seca, Birmingham, U.K.). Data on gestational age was not collected because information on last menstrual period was often missing and if present thought to be inaccurate. Biological samples collected included maternal finger prick for blood smear and hemoglobin measurement and placental blood and tissue biopsy. Hemoglobin measurements from maternal blood were made using a portable spectrophotometer (HemoCue, Ängelholm, Sweden). Maternal and placental thick blood smears were stained with 2% Giemsa for 30 minutes and examined for malaria parasites by standard microscopy. Parasite density was estimated by counting the number of asexual parasites per 200 white blood cells and calculating parasites per µL, assuming a white blood cell count of 8,000 cells per µL. A smear was judged to be negative if no parasites were seen after review of 500 high-powered fields. Final microscopy results were based on a rigorous quality control system with re-reading all blood smears by a second microscopist and resolution of any discrepancies by a third microscopist. PCR for the detection of malaria parasites were performed on placental blood stored on filter paper using nested PCR as previously described [12]. Placental biopsies of approximately 1–2 cm×1–2 cm from the maternal side were collected using scissors and placed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. After 24 hours, biopsies were trimmed with a razor blade to 1×1 cm size and formalin replaced with fresh neutral buffered formalin. Following 1–3 months of storage, placental tissue was embedded in paraffin wax, microtome sectioned and stained with 2% Giemsa, and hematoxylin and eosin. Histopathological slides were examined using standard and polarized light microscopy for hemozoin pigment in intervillous fibrin, malaria parasites, and macrophages with hemozoin pigment using standardized criteria as previously described [13]. Data were double entered in Access (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, USA), and analyses performed using STATA (Stata Corp., College Station, Texas, USA). The primary exposure variable of interest was IPTp use with SP as indicated on the participant’s antenatal card. Given the distribution of the number of SP doses reported taken, SP usage was dichotomized into <2 doses vs. ≥2 doses of IPTp. Comparisons of characteristics between the two SP usage groups were made using the chi-squared or t-test. Three definitions of placenta malaria were used: 1) any parasitemia by placental blood smear, 2) detection of parasites by PCR, and 3) any evidence of placental malaria by histopathology. Maternal peripheral parasitemia was defined as a positive blood smear and maternal anemia defined as a hemoglobin level <11 gm/dL. Low birth weight was defined as <2500 gm. Univariate and multivariate analyses of associations between SP usage and outcomes of interest were performed using logistic regression. Covariates adjusted for in multivariate analyses included maternal age, gravidity, bednet use, level of education, transmission season, and a wealth index generated using principal component analysis as previously described [14]. Characteristics used to calculate the wealth index included number of people sleeping in room with participant, and household ownership of electricity, television, mobile phone, radio, bicycle, motorcycle, refrigerator and toilet. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

The study mentioned in the description focuses on the use of intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) to reduce the risk of malaria and improve birth outcomes. The study found that the reported use of at least 2 doses of SP was associated with a lower risk of adverse outcomes, including placental malaria, low birth weight, maternal parasitemia, and maternal anemia.

Based on this study, potential innovations to improve access to maternal health could include:

1. Improved distribution and availability of SP: Ensuring that pregnant women have easy access to SP and that it is readily available at antenatal clinics and healthcare facilities.

2. Education and awareness campaigns: Conducting educational campaigns to raise awareness among pregnant women about the importance of IPTp with SP and the potential benefits in reducing the risk of malaria and improving birth outcomes.

3. Integration of antenatal care and malaria prevention services: Integrating antenatal care services with malaria prevention services to ensure that pregnant women receive both the necessary prenatal care and the recommended malaria prevention measures, including IPTp with SP.

4. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions: Utilizing mobile technology to provide reminders and information about IPTp with SP to pregnant women, as well as to track and monitor their adherence to the treatment.

5. Community-based interventions: Implementing community-based interventions to reach pregnant women in remote or underserved areas, where access to healthcare facilities may be limited. This could involve training community health workers to provide IPTp with SP and other essential maternal health services.

6. Research and development of alternative antimalarial drugs: Investing in research and development to identify and develop alternative antimalarial drugs that can be used for IPTp, especially in areas where antimalarial resistance to SP is widespread.

These innovations have the potential to improve access to maternal health by increasing the uptake of IPTp with SP and reducing the risk of malaria and adverse birth outcomes.
AI Innovations Description
The study mentioned in the description focuses on the use of intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) to reduce the risk of malaria and improve birth outcomes. The study found that the efficacy of IPTp with SP may be waning in areas where antimalarial resistance to this drug is widespread.

Based on the findings of this study, a recommendation to improve access to maternal health could be to explore alternative antimalarial drugs or combination therapies that are effective against malaria and safe for use during pregnancy. This could involve conducting further research and clinical trials to identify and evaluate alternative drugs or combinations that can be used as an alternative to SP for IPTp.

Additionally, efforts should be made to strengthen antenatal care services and ensure that pregnant women have access to regular check-ups and screenings for malaria and other health conditions. This could involve improving the availability and accessibility of antenatal clinics, training healthcare providers on the latest guidelines for malaria prevention during pregnancy, and raising awareness among pregnant women about the importance of seeking antenatal care.

Furthermore, it is important to address the issue of antimalarial resistance by implementing strategies to monitor and track the emergence and spread of resistance, as well as to develop and implement appropriate interventions to mitigate its impact. This could involve strengthening surveillance systems, promoting rational use of antimalarial drugs, and supporting research and development efforts to identify new drugs or combination therapies that are effective against resistant strains of malaria.

Overall, the recommendation is to explore alternative antimalarial drugs or combination therapies, strengthen antenatal care services, and address antimalarial resistance to improve access to maternal health and reduce the risk of malaria during pregnancy.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided information, one potential innovation to improve access to maternal health could be the development and implementation of a more effective and accessible alternative to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) for intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp) for malaria.

To simulate the impact of this recommendation on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could be developed as follows:

1. Define the objectives: Clearly outline the specific goals of the simulation, such as assessing the potential impact of the alternative intervention on reducing the prevalence of placental malaria, improving birth outcomes, and reducing maternal morbidity.

2. Gather data: Collect relevant data on the current prevalence of placental malaria, birth outcomes, and maternal morbidity in the target population. This can be done through surveys, medical records, and other sources of data.

3. Develop a simulation model: Create a mathematical or computational model that represents the dynamics of malaria transmission, pregnancy, and the impact of the alternative intervention. The model should incorporate factors such as the efficacy of the alternative intervention, coverage and adherence rates, and the interaction between malaria and pregnancy outcomes.

4. Validate the model: Validate the simulation model by comparing its outputs with real-world data. This can be done by comparing the model’s predictions with existing data on placental malaria prevalence, birth outcomes, and maternal morbidity in similar populations.

5. Conduct scenario analysis: Use the validated simulation model to assess the potential impact of the alternative intervention under different scenarios. This can involve varying parameters such as coverage rates, adherence rates, and the efficacy of the intervention. Analyze the outputs of the model to determine the potential impact on improving access to maternal health.

6. Interpret and communicate the results: Analyze the simulation results and interpret the findings in a clear and concise manner. Communicate the potential benefits and limitations of the alternative intervention to relevant stakeholders, such as policymakers, healthcare providers, and the community.

7. Monitor and evaluate: Continuously monitor the implementation of the alternative intervention and evaluate its impact on improving access to maternal health. Update the simulation model as new data becomes available and refine the recommendations based on the ongoing evaluation.

By following this methodology, it is possible to simulate the impact of recommendations, such as the development and implementation of an alternative intervention for IPTp, on improving access to maternal health. This can help inform decision-making and guide efforts to improve maternal health outcomes.

Partagez ceci :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email